WTI
W&T Offshore, Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$568M
5Y Perf.+16.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
WTI vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SOC
Sable Offshore Corp.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Market Cap$1.84T
5Y Perf.+32.5%
WTI vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | WTI | SOC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $568M | $1.84T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $522M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-142M | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 2.9% | -8.7% |
| Operating Margin | -5.7% | -367.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $351M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $141M | $98M |
WTI vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
WTI
SOC
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI) | 100 | 116.1 | +16.1% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WTI vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WTI leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Sable Offshore Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WTI
W&T Offshore, Inc.
The Income Pick
WTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 1.1%
- 73.5% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, current ratio 1.02x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SOC
Sable Offshore Corp.
The Growth Play
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 40.6%
- 9.5% revenue growth vs WTI's -4.5%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SOC | 9.5% revenue growth vs WTI's -4.5% |
| Quality / Margins | WTI | -27.2% margin vs SOC's -391.5% |
| Stability / Safety | WTI | Beta 0.01 vs SOC's 1.51 |
| Dividends | WTI | 1.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WTI | +208.8% vs SOC's -36.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WTI | -14.6% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC -32.5% vs -44.6% |
WTI vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
WTI vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWTILAGGINGSOC
SOCSable Offshore Corp.
0leads
WTIW&T Offshore, Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SOCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WTI5/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
WTI1/1
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WTI5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
WTI2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTI is the larger business by revenue, generating $522M annually — 410.4x SOC's $1M. WTI is the more profitable business, keeping -27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%.
| Metric | WTIW&T Offshore, Inc. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $522M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | -$454M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$142M | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | -$611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | -8.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | -367.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.2% | -391.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | -480.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.6% | -5.4% |
WTI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
WTI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | WTIW&T Offshore, Inc. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $568M | $1.84T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $779M | $1.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.78x | -3.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.03x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2359.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.47x | — |
WTI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WTI scores 4/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | WTIW&T Offshore, Inc. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -113.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.6% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.5% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.7% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $210M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $141M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $351M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.10x | -2.28x |
WTI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WTI and SOC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOC five years ago would be worth $13,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,950 for WTI. Over the past 12 months, WTI leads with a +208.8% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOC at 8.2% vs WTI's -3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WTIW&T Offshore, Inc. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +137.9% | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +208.8% | -36.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.3% | +26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.5% | +32.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.5% | +32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.2% | +8.2% |
Evenly matched — WTI and SOC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WTI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WTI is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTI currently trades 85.1% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WTIW&T Offshore, Inc. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.49 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.15 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.1% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.6M | 5.4M |
WTI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WTI as "Hold" and SOC as "Buy". WTI is the only dividend payer here at 1.06% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | WTIW&T Offshore, Inc. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
WTI leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallW&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
WTI vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WTI or SOC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WTI or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) delivered a total return of +32. 6%, compared to +9. 5% for W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTI returned +73. 5% versus SOC's +32. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WTI or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), W&T Offshore, Inc.
(WTI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 13544% more volatile than WTI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — WTI or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp.
grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -71. 2% for W&T Offshore, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WTI or SOC?
W&T Offshore, Inc.
(WTI) is the more profitable company, earning -29. 9% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps -29. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTI leads at -10. 5% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WTI leads at 5. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — WTI or SOC?
In this comparison, WTI (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is WTI or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, W&T Offshore, Inc.
(WTI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 1. 1% yield). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTI: +73. 5%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WTI and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WTI pays a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.