Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WTS vs AME vs ROP vs PNR vs DHR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.91B
5Y Perf.+257.0%
AME
AMETEK, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$53.23B
5Y Perf.+153.4%
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$35.34B
5Y Perf.-12.8%
PNR
Pentair plc

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$12.41B
5Y Perf.+96.3%
DHR
Danaher Corporation

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$121.14B
5Y Perf.+15.9%

WTS vs AME vs ROP vs PNR vs DHR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WTS logoWTS
AME logoAME
ROP logoROP
PNR logoPNR
DHR logoDHR
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - MachineryMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$9.91B$53.23B$35.34B$12.41B$121.14B
Revenue (TTM)$2.56B$7.60B$8.12B$4.20B$24.78B
Net Income (TTM)$366M$1.53B$1.71B$671M$3.69B
Gross Margin49.2%36.6%69.4%40.9%60.7%
Operating Margin19.4%26.2%28.1%20.6%21.0%
Forward P/E24.9x28.6x15.7x14.4x20.3x
Total Debt$198M$2.28B$9.30B$1.64B$18.42B
Cash & Equiv.$406M$458M$297M$102M$4.62B

WTS vs AME vs ROP vs PNR vs DHRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WTS
AME
ROP
PNR
DHR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Watts Water Technol… (WTS)100357.0+257.0%
AMETEK, Inc. (AME)100253.4+153.4%
Roper Technologies,… (ROP)10087.2-12.8%
Pentair plc (PNR)100196.3+96.3%
Danaher Corporation (DHR)100115.9+15.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WTS vs AME vs ROP vs PNR vs DHR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ROP leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. AME and PNR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

WTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
  • 457.2% 10Y total return vs AME's 418.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 9.8%, current ratio 2.51x
  • PEG 1.01 vs DHR's 33.47
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AME
AMETEK, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

AME ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +36.2% vs ROP's -39.7%
Best for: momentum
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

ROP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.0%
  • 12.3% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
  • 21.1% margin vs WTS's 14.3%
  • Beta 0.39 vs PNR's 1.21
Best for: income & stability
PNR
Pentair plc
The Income Pick

PNR is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 1.3% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs AME's 0.5%
Best for: dividends
DHR
Danaher Corporation
The Defensive Pick

DHR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.89, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.87x
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthROP logoROP12.3% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
ValueWTS logoWTSPEG 1.01 vs 33.47
Quality / MarginsROP logoROP21.1% margin vs WTS's 14.3%
Stability / SafetyROP logoROPBeta 0.39 vs PNR's 1.21
DividendsPNR logoPNR1.3% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs AME's 0.5%
Momentum (1Y)AME logoAME+36.2% vs ROP's -39.7%
Efficiency (ROA)WTS logoWTS13.1% ROA vs DHR's 4.5%, ROIC 21.2% vs 5.9%

WTS vs AME vs ROP vs PNR vs DHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WTSWatts Water Technologies, Inc.
FY 2020
Residential And Commercial Flow Control
52.1%$787M
H V A C And Gas
30.5%$460M
Drains And Water Reuse
10.4%$156M
Water Quality
7.0%$106M
AMEAMETEK, Inc.
FY 2025
Electronic Instruments Group
66.5%$4.9B
Electromechanical Group
33.5%$2.5B
ROPRoper Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Software And Related Services
100.0%$12.3B
PNRPentair plc
FY 2025
Pool
37.3%$1.6B
Industrial & Flow Technologies
37.2%$1.6B
Water Unit
25.4%$1.1B
DHRDanaher Corporation
FY 2025
Revenue from Contract with Customer, Measurement, Recurring
81.9%$20.1B
Revenue from Contract with Customer, Measurement, Nonrecurring
18.1%$4.4B

WTS vs AME vs ROP vs PNR vs DHR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWTSLAGGINGDHR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ROP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

DHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.8B annually — 9.7x WTS's $2.6B. ROP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WTS's 14.3%. On growth, WTS holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWTS logoWTSWatts Water Techn…AME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.6B$7.6B$8.1B$4.2B$24.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$553M$2.3B$3.2B$983M$7.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$366M$1.5B$1.7B$671M$3.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$317M$1.7B$2.6B$716M$5.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.2%+36.6%+69.4%+40.9%+60.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.4%+26.2%+28.1%+20.6%+21.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.3%+20.1%+21.1%+16.0%+14.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.4%+22.4%+31.4%+17.0%+21.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.4%+11.3%+11.3%+2.6%+3.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+34.4%+14.5%+59.1%+12.9%+9.8%
ROP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ROP and PNR each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 19.4x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 47% valuation discount to AME's 36.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WTS offers better value at 1.18x vs DHR's 33.47x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricWTS logoWTSWatts Water Techn…AME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$9.9B$53.2B$35.3B$12.4B$121.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.7B$55.1B$44.3B$14.0B$134.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS29.19x36.31x24.18x19.40x33.96x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.95x28.56x15.66x14.35x20.29x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.18x3.25x2.52x1.48x33.47x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x29.29x14.27x14.31x17.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.07x7.19x4.47x2.97x4.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.91x5.06x1.86x3.29x2.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF27.83x31.85x14.18x16.64x23.03x
Evenly matched — ROP and PNR each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WTS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

WTS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for DHR. WTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ROP's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs ROP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWTS logoWTSWatts Water Techn…AME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+18.4%+14.4%+8.8%+17.7%+7.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.1%+9.6%+5.0%+9.9%+4.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+21.2%+12.1%+6.1%+12.1%+5.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+21.7%+15.0%+7.7%+15.0%+7.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977687
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.21x0.47x0.42x0.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$208M$1.8B$9.0B$1.5B$13.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$406M$458M$297M$102M$4.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$198M$2.3B$9.3B$1.6B$18.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense46.73x23.34x6.50x11.94x18.13x
WTS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WTS five years ago would be worth $21,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,681 for DHR. Over the past 12 months, AME leads with a +36.2% total return vs ROP's -39.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTS at 21.1% vs ROP's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWTS logoWTSWatts Water Techn…AME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6.8%+11.3%-20.6%-26.7%-25.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.2%+36.2%-39.7%-16.8%-11.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+77.6%+62.6%-23.0%+36.1%-17.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+119.0%+73.3%-19.5%+17.9%-23.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+457.2%+418.8%+109.8%+121.3%+212.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+21.1%+17.6%-8.3%+10.8%-6.3%
WTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AME and ROP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ROP is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNR's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AME currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs ROP's 58.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWTS logoWTSWatts Water Techn…AME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.92x0.94x0.39x1.21x0.89x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$345.17$243.18$584.03$113.95$242.80
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$221.04$170.47$313.86$76.69$170.74
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+86.0%+95.6%+58.8%+67.4%+70.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.854.546.333.734.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded212K1.2M1.2M1.6M4.2M
Evenly matched — AME and ROP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AME and PNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WTS as "Hold", AME as "Buy", ROP as "Buy", PNR as "Hold", DHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs 6.6% for AME (target: $248). For income investors, PNR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.29% vs AME's 0.53%.

MetricWTS logoWTSWatts Water Techn…AME logoAMEAMETEK, Inc.ROP logoROPRoper Technologie…PNR logoPNRPentair plcDHR logoDHRDanaher Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$343.10$247.73$457.64$113.56$247.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2329234142
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+0.5%+1.0%+1.3%+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14161261
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.00$1.23$3.29$0.99$1.23
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+0.8%+1.4%+1.8%+2.5%
Evenly matched — AME and PNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WTS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ROP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.

Best OverallWatts Water Technologies, I… (WTS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WTS vs AME vs ROP vs PNR vs DHR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WTS or AME or ROP or PNR or DHR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.

(ROP) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 4x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMETEK, Inc. (AME) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WTS or AME or ROP or PNR or DHR?

On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.

4x versus AMETEK, Inc. at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Watts Water Technologies, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus Danaher Corporation's 33. 47x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WTS or AME or ROP or PNR or DHR?

Over the past 5 years, Watts Water Technologies, Inc.

(WTS) delivered a total return of +119. 0%, compared to -23. 2% for Danaher Corporation (DHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTS returned +457. 2% versus ROP's +109. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WTS or AME or ROP or PNR or DHR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Roper Technologies, Inc.

(ROP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Pentair plc's 1. 21β — meaning PNR is approximately 208% more volatile than ROP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 47% for Roper Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WTS or AME or ROP or PNR or DHR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roper Technologies, Inc.

(ROP) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Watts Water Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -4. 7% for Danaher Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROP leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WTS or AME or ROP or PNR or DHR?

AMETEK, Inc.

(AME) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 0% net margin versus 14. 0% for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROP leads at 28. 3% versus 19. 3% for WTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROP leads at 69. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WTS or AME or ROP or PNR or DHR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Danaher Corporation's 33. 47x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for AMETEK, Inc. — 14. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 47. 8% to $113. 56.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WTS or AME or ROP or PNR or DHR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Pentair plc (PNR) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 5% for AMETEK, Inc. (AME).

09

Is WTS or AME or ROP or PNR or DHR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.

(ROP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 0% yield, +109. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROP: +109. 8%, PNR: +121. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WTS and AME and ROP and PNR and DHR?

These companies operate in different sectors (WTS (Industrials) and AME (Industrials) and ROP (Industrials) and PNR (Industrials) and DHR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WTS

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AME

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ROP

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PNR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DHR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WTS and AME and ROP and PNR and DHR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WTS: 21.4% · AME: 11.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(WTS: 14.3% · AME: 20.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WTS: 29.2x · AME: 36.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.