Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WYHG vs PZZA vs USFD vs DPZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Food Distribution
Restaurants
WYHG vs PZZA vs USFD vs DPZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Restaurants | Food Distribution | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $41M | $1.13B | $18.02B | $10.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98.97B | $2.01B | $39.68B | $4.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.29B | $37M | $677M | $592M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 20.3% | 17.4% | 40.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 4.2% | 3.1% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 5.3x | 23.2x | 17.3x | 16.2x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $1.09B | $5.72B | $5.23B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $37M | $41M | $434M |
WYHG vs PZZA vs USFD vs DPZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wing Yip Food Holdi… (WYHG) | 100 | 20.7 | -79.3% |
| Papa John's Interna… (PZZA) | 100 | 68.7 | -31.3% |
| US Foods Holding Co… (USFD) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
| Domino's Pizza, Inc. (DPZ) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WYHG vs PZZA vs USFD vs DPZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WYHG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.3x vs 17.3x)
- 30.2% ROA vs PZZA's 4.1%, ROIC 109.1% vs 11.7%
PZZA is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs DPZ's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
USFD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 45.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 227.5% 10Y total return vs DPZ's 189.1%
- +4.2% vs WYHG's -47.4%
DPZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.23, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, current ratio 1.65x
- Beta 0.23, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.65x
- 5.0% revenue growth vs WYHG's -8.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs WYHG's -8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.3x vs 17.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs USFD's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs WYHG's 0.82 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs DPZ's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.2% vs WYHG's -47.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 30.2% ROA vs PZZA's 4.1%, ROIC 109.1% vs 11.7% |
WYHG vs PZZA vs USFD vs DPZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WYHG vs PZZA vs USFD vs DPZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WYHG leads in 2 of 6 categories
DPZ leads 1 • USFD leads 1 • PZZA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DPZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WYHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $99.0B annually — 49.1x PZZA's $2.0B. DPZ is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USFD's 1.7%. On growth, DPZ holds the edge at +3.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $99.0B | $2.0B | $39.7B | $5.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.5B | $176M | $1.6B | $999M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | $37M | $677M | $592M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $36M | $848M | $654M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +20.3% | +17.4% | +40.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +4.2% | +3.1% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +1.8% | +1.7% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +1.8% | +2.1% | +13.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | -7.7% | +2.8% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.9% | -22.2% | +6.1% | -4.6% |
Valuation Metrics
WYHG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, WYHG trades at a 86% valuation discount to PZZA's 38.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WYHG's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DPZ's 14.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $1.1B | $18.0B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $2.2B | $23.7B | $15.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.32x | 38.01x | 27.84x | 17.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.17x | 17.31x | 16.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.41x | 12.03x | 13.99x | 14.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.55x | 0.46x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 358.77x | — | 4.37x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.36x | 18.79x | 15.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WYHG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WYHG delivers a 38.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $38 in annual profit, vs $15 for USFD. WYHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USFD's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DPZ scores 8/9 vs WYHG's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +38.0% | — | +15.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +30.2% | +4.1% | +4.8% | +33.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +109.1% | +11.7% | +9.3% | +73.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +89.1% | +14.3% | +12.0% | +137.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | — | 1.33x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$57M | $1.1B | $5.7B | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $37M | $41M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $1.1B | $5.7B | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.25x | 1.86x | 3.94x | 4.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USFD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USFD five years ago would be worth $20,506 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,922 for WYHG. Over the past 12 months, USFD leads with a +4.2% total return vs WYHG's -47.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USFD at 26.7% vs WYHG's -42.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.0% | -12.8% | +9.6% | -26.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.4% | -17.7% | +4.2% | -33.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -44.7% | +103.4% | +13.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -55.1% | +105.1% | -20.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -25.5% | +227.5% | +189.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.3% | -17.9% | +26.7% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — USFD and DPZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DPZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WYHG's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. USFD currently trades 80.1% from its 52-week high vs WYHG's 42.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.57x | 0.40x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.91 | $55.74 | $102.13 | $496.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $29.55 | $69.88 | $297.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.7% | +61.4% | +80.1% | +62.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 52.9 | 34.5 | 35.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 821K | 1.0M | 2.2M | 889K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PZZA and DPZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PZZA as "Buy", USFD as "Buy", DPZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.1% upside for DPZ (target: $426) vs 11.1% for PZZA (target: $38). For income investors, PZZA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs DPZ's 2.23%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $38.00 | $107.78 | $425.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 32 | 25 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.4% | — | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.86 | — | $6.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% | +3.4% |
WYHG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). DPZ leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
WYHG vs PZZA vs USFD vs DPZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WYHG or PZZA or USFD or DPZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Domino's Pizza, Inc.
(DPZ) is the stronger pick with 5. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 8% for Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG). Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Papa John's International, Inc. (PZZA) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WYHG or PZZA or USFD or DPZ?
On trailing P/E, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is the cheapest at 5.
3x versus Papa John's International, Inc. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Domino's Pizza, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WYHG or PZZA or USFD or DPZ?
Over the past 5 years, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) delivered a total return of +105. 1%, compared to -80. 8% for Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: USFD returned +227. 5% versus WYHG's -80. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WYHG or PZZA or USFD or DPZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Domino's Pizza, Inc.
(DPZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares's 0. 82β — meaning WYHG is approximately 264% more volatile than DPZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 133% for US Foods Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WYHG or PZZA or USFD or DPZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Domino's Pizza, Inc.
(DPZ) is pulling ahead at 5. 0% versus -8. 8% for Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: US Foods Holding Corp. grew EPS 45. 5% year-over-year, compared to -64. 6% for Papa John's International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WYHG leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WYHG or PZZA or USFD or DPZ?
Domino's Pizza, Inc.
(DPZ) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 1. 5% for Papa John's International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DPZ leads at 19. 3% versus 3. 1% for USFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DPZ leads at 40. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WYHG or PZZA or USFD or DPZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Domino's Pizza, Inc.
(DPZ) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 23. 2x for Papa John's International, Inc. — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DPZ: 37. 1% to $425. 94.
08Which pays a better dividend — WYHG or PZZA or USFD or DPZ?
In this comparison, PZZA (5.
4% yield), DPZ (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. WYHG, USFD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WYHG or PZZA or USFD or DPZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Domino's Pizza, Inc.
(DPZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 2. 2% yield, +189. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DPZ: +189. 1%, WYHG: -80. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WYHG and PZZA and USFD and DPZ?
These companies operate in different sectors (WYHG (Consumer Defensive) and PZZA (Consumer Cyclical) and USFD (Consumer Defensive) and DPZ (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WYHG is a small-cap deep-value stock; PZZA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; USFD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DPZ is a mid-cap deep-value stock. PZZA, DPZ pay a dividend while WYHG, USFD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.