Software - Infrastructure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
XBP vs PERI vs MGNI vs QUAD vs PUBM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Advertising Agencies
Specialty Business Services
Software - Application
XBP vs PERI vs MGNI vs QUAD vs PUBM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information | Advertising Agencies | Specialty Business Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $23M | $348M | $2.33B | $397M | $530M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $653M | $441M | $723M | $2.37B | $282M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.10B | $-10M | $159M | $27M | $-17M |
| Gross Margin | 16.2% | 33.3% | 63.4% | 18.5% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | -3.9% | 14.8% | 5.0% | -7.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 7.2x | 15.3x | 6.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $431M | $42M | $279M | $444M | $44M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $91M | $553M | $63M | $146M |
XBP vs PERI vs MGNI vs QUAD vs PUBM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XBP Global Holdings… (XBP) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) | 100 | 50.9 | -49.1% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 54.7 | -45.3% |
| Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) | 100 | 229.3 | +129.3% |
| PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) | 100 | 38.4 | -61.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XBP vs PERI vs MGNI vs QUAD vs PUBM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 454.1%, EPS growth 230.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 63.6%
- 454.1% revenue growth vs PERI's -11.7%
- Better valuation composite
- 167.8% margin vs PUBM's -6.2%
PERI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 159.9% 10Y total return vs MGNI's 17.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 2.76x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 2.76x
MGNI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
QUAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 3.8%
- Beta 0.74 vs PUBM's 1.50
- 3.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, PUBM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 454.1% revenue growth vs PERI's -11.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 167.8% margin vs PUBM's -6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs PUBM's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +150.0% vs PERI's -13.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 155.0% ROA vs PUBM's -2.6%, ROIC 3.8% vs -6.8% |
XBP vs PERI vs MGNI vs QUAD vs PUBM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
XBP vs PERI vs MGNI vs QUAD vs PUBM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QUAD leads in 5 of 6 categories
MGNI leads 1 • XBP leads 0 • PERI leads 0 • PUBM leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGNI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QUAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 8.4x PUBM's $282M. XBP is the more profitable business, keeping 167.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PUBM's -6.2%. On growth, XBP holds the edge at +4.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $653M | $441M | $723M | $2.4B | $282M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29M | $2M | $145M | $196M | $22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | -$10M | $159M | $27M | -$17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$164M | $52M | $44M | $44M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +33.3% | +63.4% | +18.5% | +63.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -3.9% | +14.8% | +5.0% | -7.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +167.8% | -2.2% | +22.0% | +1.2% | -6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.2% | +11.9% | +6.1% | +1.9% | +15.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +1.2% | +5.5% | -7.7% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.3% | -36.8% | +142.9% | +18.2% | -35.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QUAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, XBP trades at a 100% valuation discount to MGNI's 17.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QUAD's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PERI's 73.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $348M | $2.3B | $397M | $530M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $418M | $299M | $2.1B | $777M | $428M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.03x | -44.32x | 17.11x | 14.06x | -36.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.17x | 15.28x | 6.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.89x | 72.98x | 13.55x | 3.94x | 16.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.03x | 0.79x | 3.26x | 0.16x | 1.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.33x | 0.52x | 2.71x | 2.95x | 2.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.11x | 14.05x | 7.82x | 7.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QUAD leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XBP delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PUBM. PERI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XBP's 4.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QUAD scores 7/9 vs PERI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | -1.4% | +18.6% | +25.0% | -7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +155.0% | -1.1% | +5.3% | +2.2% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | -1.7% | +9.5% | +17.9% | -6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | -1.8% | +7.3% | +19.3% | -5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.94x | 0.06x | 0.30x | 3.45x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $394M | -$49M | -$275M | $381M | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $91M | $553M | $63M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $431M | $42M | $279M | $444M | $44M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.12x | — | 4.03x | 2.11x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QUAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QUAD five years ago would be worth $21,931 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,475 for XBP. Over the past 12 months, XBP leads with a +150.0% total return vs PERI's -13.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QUAD at 30.7% vs XBP's -39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.5% | -9.9% | +1.2% | +34.1% | +32.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +150.0% | -13.4% | -7.8% | +46.8% | +1.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.4% | -75.0% | +22.1% | +123.5% | -39.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.3% | -50.5% | -48.9% | +119.3% | -67.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.8% | +159.9% | +17.3% | -39.2% | -61.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.1% | -37.0% | +6.9% | +30.7% | -15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
QUAD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QUAD is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PUBM's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QUAD currently trades 87.8% from its 52-week high vs XBP's 28.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 0.94x | 1.39x | 0.74x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.55 | $11.44 | $26.65 | $8.64 | $13.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.41 | $7.63 | $10.82 | $5.01 | $6.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.7% | +73.6% | +61.0% | +87.8% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.1 | 38.7 | 68.4 | 51.8 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 402K | 2.4M | 185K | 673K |
Analyst Outlook
QUAD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PERI as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy", QUAD as "Buy", PUBM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.3% upside for PERI (target: $14) vs 5.4% for QUAD (target: $8). QUAD is the only dividend payer here at 3.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.50 | $19.25 | $8.00 | $13.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 31 | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.5% | +2.0% | +2.0% | +8.8% |
QUAD leads in 5 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MGNI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
XBP vs PERI vs MGNI vs QUAD vs PUBM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XBP or PERI or MGNI or QUAD or PUBM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, XBP Global Holdings, Inc.
(XBP) is the stronger pick with 454. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 7% for Perion Network Ltd. (PERI). XBP Global Holdings, Inc. (XBP) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XBP or PERI or MGNI or QUAD or PUBM?
On trailing P/E, XBP Global Holdings, Inc.
(XBP) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus Magnite, Inc. at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, Quad/Graphics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XBP or PERI or MGNI or QUAD or PUBM?
Over the past 5 years, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) delivered a total return of +119. 3%, compared to -75. 3% for XBP Global Holdings, Inc. (XBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PERI returned +159. 9% versus XBP's -74. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XBP or PERI or MGNI or QUAD or PUBM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus PubMatic, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning PUBM is approximately 101% more volatile than QUAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 5% for XBP Global Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XBP or PERI or MGNI or QUAD or PUBM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), XBP Global Holdings, Inc.
(XBP) is pulling ahead at 454. 1% versus -11. 7% for Perion Network Ltd. (PERI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XBP Global Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 230. 0% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for PubMatic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XBP leads at 63. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XBP or PERI or MGNI or QUAD or PUBM?
XBP Global Holdings, Inc.
(XBP) is the more profitable company, earning 139. 5% net margin versus -5. 1% for PubMatic, Inc. — meaning it keeps 139. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGNI leads at 13. 7% versus -6. 1% for PUBM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PUBM leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XBP or PERI or MGNI or QUAD or PUBM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Magnite, Inc. — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PERI: 60. 3% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — XBP or PERI or MGNI or QUAD or PUBM?
In this comparison, QUAD (3.
8% yield) pays a dividend. XBP, PERI, MGNI, PUBM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XBP or PERI or MGNI or QUAD or PUBM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QUAD: -39. 2%, PUBM: -61. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XBP and PERI and MGNI and QUAD and PUBM?
These companies operate in different sectors (XBP (Technology) and PERI (Communication Services) and MGNI (Communication Services) and QUAD (Industrials) and PUBM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XBP is a small-cap high-growth stock; PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; QUAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PUBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. QUAD pays a dividend while XBP, PERI, MGNI, PUBM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.