Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XHG vs RCON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
XHG vs RCON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $11M | $18M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $376M | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-609M | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 4.2% | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | -245.5% | -86.5% |
| Total Debt | $1.10B | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $99M |
XHG vs RCON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XChange TEC.INC (XHG) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XHG vs RCON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, XHG is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
RCON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47
- Rev growth -3.7%, EPS growth 52.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.5%
- -99.2% 10Y total return vs XHG's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.7% revenue growth vs XHG's -78.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -64.3% margin vs XHG's -161.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs XHG's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -52.9% vs XHG's -57.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -8.0% ROA vs XHG's -5.3%, ROIC -10.6% vs -82.4% |
XHG vs RCON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
XHG vs RCON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — XHG and RCON each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $376M annually — 5.7x RCON's $66M. RCON is the more profitable business, keeping -64.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XHG's -161.9%. On growth, XHG holds the edge at +14.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $376M | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$923M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$609M | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$43M | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +23.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -86.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -161.9% | -64.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -65.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.5% | +35.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — XHG and RCON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $18M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $171M | $8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.33x | -1.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 1.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCON leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -82.4% | -10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -11.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | -$64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $99M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.56x | -372.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCON leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCON five years ago would be worth $59 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for XHG. Over the past 12 months, RCON leads with a -52.9% total return vs XHG's -57.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCON at -50.6% vs XHG's -95.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.8% | -42.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.4% | -52.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -87.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -95.9% | -50.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XHG and RCON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCON is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XHG's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XHG currently trades 31.9% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.23 | $7.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.68 | $0.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.9% | +12.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 90K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCON leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
XHG vs RCON: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — XHG or RCON?
Over the past 5 years, Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) delivered a total return of -99. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for XChange TEC. INC (XHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCON returned -99. 2% versus XHG's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — XHG or RCON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus XChange TEC. INC's 1. 73β — meaning XHG is approximately 268% more volatile than RCON relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — XHG or RCON?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XChange TEC.
INC grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 52. 6% for Recon Technology, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCON leads at -7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — XHG or RCON?
Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the more profitable company, earning -64. 3% net margin versus -78. 7% for XChange TEC. INC — meaning it keeps -64. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCON leads at -86. 5% versus -204. 2% for XHG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCON leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — XHG or RCON?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is XHG or RCON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). XChange TEC. INC (XHG) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCON: -99. 2%, XHG: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between XHG and RCON?
These companies operate in different sectors (XHG (Real Estate) and RCON (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.