Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XMTR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VELO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.95B
5Y Perf.-10.2%
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$529.86B
5Y Perf.-79.8%
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$19.12B
5Y Perf.+405.0%
VELO
Velo3D, Inc.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$301M
5Y Perf.+26.0%

XMTR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VELO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XMTR logoXMTR
SPIR logoSPIR
ASTS logoASTS
VELO logoVELO
IndustryIndustrial - MachinerySpecialty Business ServicesCommunication EquipmentComputer Hardware
Market Cap$3.95B$529.86B$19.12B$301M
Revenue (TTM)$741M$72M$71M$49M
Net Income (TTM)$-52M$-25.02B$-342M$-73M
Gross Margin39.3%40.8%53.4%-1.8%
Operating Margin-4.8%-121.4%-405.7%-114.5%
Forward P/E117.0x10.0x
Total Debt$349M$8.76B$32M$6.30B
Cash & Equiv.$15M$24.81B$2.34B$39.01B

XMTR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VELOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XMTR
SPIR
ASTS
VELO
StockJun 21May 26Return
Xometry, Inc. (XMTR)10089.8-10.2%
Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR)10020.2-79.8%
AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS)100505.0+405.0%
Velo3D, Inc. (VELO)100126.0+26.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XMTR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VELO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: XMTR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Spire Global, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. VELO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.
The Income Pick

XMTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.94
  • Beta 1.94, current ratio 3.76x
  • -7.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
  • Beta 1.94 vs VELO's 3.88
Best for: income & stability and defensive
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
The Value Play

SPIR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ASTS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs VELO's 21.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
VELO
Velo3D, Inc.
The Growth Play

VELO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 1.1K%, EPS growth 95.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
  • 1.1K% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVELO logoVELO1.1K% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
ValueSPIR logoSPIRBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsXMTR logoXMTR-7.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
Stability / SafetyXMTR logoXMTRBeta 1.94 vs VELO's 3.88
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)XMTR logoXMTR+162.1% vs SPIR's +73.1%
Efficiency (ROA)XMTR logoXMTR-7.3% ROA vs VELO's -82.6%, ROIC -5.7% vs -15.0%

XMTR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VELO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XMTRXometry, Inc.
FY 2025
Marketplace Revenue
91.7%$630M
Service
8.3%$57M
SPIRSpire Global, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ASTSAST SpaceMobile, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
62.6%$44M
Service
37.4%$27M
VELOVelo3D, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

XMTR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VELO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLXMTRLAGGINGVELO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

XMTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

XMTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $741M annually — 15.1x VELO's $49M. XMTR is the more profitable business, keeping -7.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$741M$72M$71M$49M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$21M-$74M-$237M-$53M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$52M-$25.0B-$342M-$73M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$11M-$16.2B-$1.1B-$24M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.3%+40.8%+53.4%-1.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.8%-121.4%-4.1%-114.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.0%-349.6%-4.8%-148.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.5%-227.0%-16.0%-48.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.9%-26.9%+27.3%+65.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.7%+59.5%-55.6%+98.1%
XMTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — XMTR and SPIR and VELO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.0B$529.9B$19.1B$301M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.3B$513.8B$16.8B-$32.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-64.34x10.01x-48.76x-2.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.116.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.76x7405.21x269.64x0.01x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share14.41x4.56x5.68x5.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — XMTR and SPIR and VELO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

XMTR delivers a -18.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-19 in annual profit, vs $-2 for VELO. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XMTR's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs VELO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-18.8%-88.4%-21.1%-2.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.3%-47.3%-12.6%-82.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.7%-0.1%-47.1%-15.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.5%-0.1%-10.0%-153.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93553
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.26x0.08x0.01x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$334M-$16.1B-$2.3B-$32.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$24.8B$2.3B$39.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$349M$8.8B$32M$6.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-20.58x9.20x-21.20x-19.11x
SPIR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,035 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, XMTR leads with a +162.1% total return vs SPIR's +73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs VELO's 27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+25.1%+106.4%-21.7%-26.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+162.1%+73.1%+158.1%+107.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+493.8%+198.1%+1194.0%+107.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.2%-79.6%+688.2%+25.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.2%-78.8%+568.8%+21.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+81.1%+43.9%+134.8%+27.5%
ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

XMTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

XMTR is the less volatile stock with a 1.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VELO's 3.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XMTR currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs ASTS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.94x2.93x2.82x3.88x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$82.11$23.59$129.89$23.84
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$29.60$6.60$22.47$2.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.6%+68.3%+50.3%+51.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.855.541.852.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded840K1.6M14.9M2.3M
XMTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: XMTR as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", VELO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.2% upside for VELO (target: $20) vs -18.1% for XMTR (target: $64).

MetricXMTR logoXMTRXometry, Inc.SPIR logoSPIRSpire Global, Inc.ASTS logoASTSAST SpaceMobile, …VELO logoVELOVelo3D, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$64.33$17.25$103.65$20.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts141271
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

XMTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). SPIR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallXometry, Inc. (XMTR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XMTR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VELO: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XMTR or SPIR or ASTS or VELO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Velo3D, Inc.

(VELO) is the stronger pick with 1120% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — XMTR or SPIR or ASTS or VELO?

Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -79. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — XMTR or SPIR or ASTS or VELO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xometry, Inc.

(XMTR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 94β versus Velo3D, Inc. 's 3. 88β — meaning VELO is approximately 101% more volatile than XMTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — XMTR or SPIR or ASTS or VELO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Velo3D, Inc.

(VELO) is pulling ahead at 1120% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -18. 4% for Xometry, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VELO leads at 735. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — XMTR or SPIR or ASTS or VELO?

Spire Global, Inc.

(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XMTR leads at -6. 6% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is XMTR or SPIR or ASTS or VELO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VELO: 66.

2% to $20. 33.

07

Which pays a better dividend — XMTR or SPIR or ASTS or VELO?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is XMTR or SPIR or ASTS or VELO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.

(ASTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+568. 8% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASTS: +568. 8%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between XMTR and SPIR and ASTS and VELO?

These companies operate in different sectors (XMTR (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and VELO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: XMTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VELO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XMTR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPIR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ASTS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 1365%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VELO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform XMTR and SPIR and ASTS and VELO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(XMTR: 35.9% · SPIR: -26.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.