XPRO vs AROC

For growth investors, Archrock, Inc.

(AROC) is the stronger pick with 28. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for Expro Group Holdings N. V. (XPRO). Archrock, Inc. (AROC) offers the better valuation at 20. 7x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Expro Group Holdings N. V. (XPRO) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Archrock, Inc.

(AROC) is the cheapest at 20. 7x versus Expro Group Holdings N. V. at 34. 6x. On forward P/E, Expro Group Holdings N. V. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Archrock, Inc.

(AROC) delivered a total return of +327. 1%, compared to -32. 1% for Expro Group Holdings N. V. (XPRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AROC returned +577. 9% versus XPRO's -78. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archrock, Inc.

(AROC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus Expro Group Holdings N. V. 's 1. 22β — meaning XPRO is approximately 35% more volatile than AROC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expro Group Holdings N. V. (XPRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 162% for Archrock, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Archrock, Inc.

(AROC) is pulling ahead at 28. 7% versus -6. 2% for Expro Group Holdings N. V. (XPRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Archrock, Inc. grew EPS 75. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Expro Group Holdings N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AROC leads at 20. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Archrock, Inc.

(AROC) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 3. 2% for Expro Group Holdings N. V. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AROC leads at 38. 7% versus 7. 2% for XPRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AROC leads at 48. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Expro Group Holdings N.

V. (XPRO) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Archrock, Inc. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XPRO: 18. 9% to $18. 50.

In this comparison, AROC (2.

1% yield) pays a dividend. XPRO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Archrock, Inc.

(AROC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91), 2. 1% yield, +577. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AROC: +577. 9%, XPRO: -78. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: XPRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AROC is a small-cap high-growth stock. AROC pays a dividend while XPRO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.