Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XPRO vs KLXE vs WTTR vs NINE vs PUMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Regulated Water
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
XPRO vs KLXE vs WTTR vs NINE vs PUMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Regulated Water | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.76B | $58M | $1.89B | $427M | $1.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.58B | $637M | $1.40B | $571M | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $-77M | $22M | $-41M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 21.2% | 18.2% | 11.5% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 10.2% | 2.3% | 2.0% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 14.8x | — | 41.7x | — | 1993.6x |
| Total Debt | $225M | $318M | $374M | $383M | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $6M | $18M | $18M | $91M |
XPRO vs KLXE vs WTTR vs NINE vs PUMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expro Group Holding… (XPRO) | 100 | 115.3 | +15.3% |
| KLX Energy Services… (KLXE) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 283.2 | +183.2% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 485.2 | +385.2% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 314.1 | +214.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XPRO vs KLXE vs WTTR vs NINE vs PUMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XPRO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -6.2%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 14.6%, current ratio 2.16x
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 1993.6x)
- 2.9% margin vs KLXE's -12.1%
KLXE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21
WTTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
- 26.6% 10Y total return vs NINE's -62.3%
- Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.57x
- -3.1% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +15.1% vs KLXE's +65.5%
Among these 5 stocks, PUMP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 1993.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.9% margin vs KLXE's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs KLXE's +65.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs KLXE's -21.3%, ROIC 5.7% vs -9.4% |
XPRO vs KLXE vs WTTR vs NINE vs PUMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XPRO vs KLXE vs WTTR vs NINE vs PUMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XPRO leads in 2 of 6 categories
KLXE leads 1 • NINE leads 1 • WTTR leads 1 • PUMP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KLXE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 2.8x NINE's $571M. XPRO is the more profitable business, keeping 2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KLXE's -12.1%. On growth, WTTR holds the edge at -2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $637M | $1.4B | $571M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $202M | $160M | $217M | $61M | $154M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | -$77M | $22M | -$41M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | -$42M | -$95M | -$7M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +21.2% | +18.2% | +11.5% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +10.2% | +2.3% | +2.0% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | -12.1% | +1.5% | -7.2% | -1.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | -6.5% | -6.8% | -1.2% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | -5.3% | -2.3% | -4.4% | -24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -108.3% | +13.3% | -4.4% | -34.6% | -134.2% |
Valuation Metrics
XPRO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.6x trailing earnings, XPRO trades at a 98% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KLXE's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $58M | $1.9B | $427M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $371M | $2.2B | $791M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.58x | -0.79x | 84.10x | -7.88x | 1993.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.82x | — | 41.66x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.82x | 5.71x | 10.70x | 337.01x | 10.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 0.09x | 1.34x | — | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | — | 1.88x | — | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.04x | — | — | — | 44.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XPRO leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XPRO delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PUMP. XPRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WTTR's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XPRO scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | — | +2.2% | — | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | -21.3% | +1.3% | -11.5% | -1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | -9.4% | +2.3% | +0.7% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | -11.4% | +2.9% | +0.9% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | — | 0.40x | — | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27M | $313M | $356M | $364M | $158M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $6M | $18M | $18M | $91M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $225M | $318M | $374M | $383M | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.15x | -0.67x | 1.54x | 0.24x | -0.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,717 for KLXE. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs KLXE's +65.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NINE at 35.7% vs KLXE's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.1% | +68.0% | +52.9% | +2682.5% | +58.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +101.3% | +65.5% | +134.2% | +1505.8% | +201.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.3% | -68.3% | +135.9% | +150.0% | +132.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -72.8% | +158.4% | +385.2% | +41.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.4% | -97.6% | +26.6% | -62.3% | +7.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.3% | -31.8% | +33.1% | +35.7% | +32.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KLXE and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KLXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs KLXE's 80.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.76x | 1.09x | 3.21x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.73 | $4.06 | $17.95 | $10.23 | $18.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.57 | $1.46 | $7.20 | $0.00 | $4.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +80.3% | +93.7% | +96.3% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.3 | 56.9 | 69.4 | 82.9 | 51.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 307K | 1.7M | 125K | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
WTTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XPRO as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy", NINE as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -5.1% for PUMP (target: $15). WTTR is the only dividend payer here at 1.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.50 | — | $16.00 | $18.00 | $14.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | — | 14 | 9 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.32 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
XPRO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KLXE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
XPRO vs KLXE vs WTTR vs NINE vs PUMP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XPRO or KLXE or WTTR or NINE or PUMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the stronger pick with -3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Expro Group Holdings N. V. (XPRO) offers the better valuation at 34. 6x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Expro Group Holdings N. V. (XPRO) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XPRO or KLXE or WTTR or NINE or PUMP?
On trailing P/E, Expro Group Holdings N.
V. (XPRO) is the cheapest at 34. 6x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, Expro Group Holdings N. V. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XPRO or KLXE or WTTR or NINE or PUMP?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -72. 8% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTTR returned +26. 6% versus KLXE's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XPRO or KLXE or WTTR or NINE or PUMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
(KLXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 321% more volatile than KLXE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expro Group Holdings N. V. (XPRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 40% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XPRO or KLXE or WTTR or NINE or PUMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is pulling ahead at -3. 1% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XPRO leads at 7. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XPRO or KLXE or WTTR or NINE or PUMP?
Expro Group Holdings N.
V. (XPRO) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -12. 1% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPRO leads at 7. 2% versus -4. 8% for KLXE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KLXE leads at 21. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XPRO or KLXE or WTTR or NINE or PUMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Expro Group Holdings N.
V. (XPRO) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 26. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — XPRO or KLXE or WTTR or NINE or PUMP?
In this comparison, WTTR (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. XPRO, KLXE, NINE, PUMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XPRO or KLXE or WTTR or NINE or PUMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 1. 9% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTTR: +26. 6%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XPRO and KLXE and WTTR and NINE and PUMP?
These companies operate in different sectors (XPRO (Energy) and KLXE (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities) and NINE (Energy) and PUMP (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WTTR pays a dividend while XPRO, KLXE, NINE, PUMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.