Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XPRO vs WTTR vs NINE vs KLXE vs NCSM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
XPRO vs WTTR vs NINE vs KLXE vs NCSM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Regulated Water | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.76B | $1.89B | $427M | $58M | $105M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.58B | $1.40B | $571M | $637M | $180M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $22M | $-41M | $-77M | $19M |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 18.2% | 11.5% | 21.2% | 36.7% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 2.3% | 2.0% | 10.2% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 14.8x | 41.7x | — | — | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $225M | $374M | $383M | $318M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $18M | $18M | $6M | $37M |
XPRO vs WTTR vs NINE vs KLXE vs NCSM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expro Group Holding… (XPRO) | 100 | 115.3 | +15.3% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 283.2 | +183.2% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 485.2 | +385.2% |
| KLX Energy Services… (KLXE) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
| NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM) | 100 | 383.0 | +283.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XPRO vs WTTR vs NINE vs KLXE vs NCSM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XPRO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WTTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
- 26.6% 10Y total return vs NINE's -62.3%
- 1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
NINE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +15.1% vs NCSM's +28.1%
Among these 5 stocks, KLXE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NCSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 239.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
- Beta 0.28, current ratio 4.27x
- 13.6% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.6% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs KLXE's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs NINE's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs NCSM's +28.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs KLXE's -21.3%, ROIC 7.9% vs -9.4% |
XPRO vs WTTR vs NINE vs KLXE vs NCSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XPRO vs WTTR vs NINE vs KLXE vs NCSM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NCSM leads in 3 of 6 categories
NINE leads 1 • WTTR leads 1 • XPRO leads 0 • KLXE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NCSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 8.8x NCSM's $180M. NCSM is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KLXE's -12.1%. On growth, WTTR holds the edge at -2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $1.4B | $571M | $637M | $180M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $202M | $217M | $61M | $160M | $15M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | $22M | -$41M | -$77M | $19M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | -$95M | -$7M | -$42M | $24M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +18.2% | +11.5% | +21.2% | +36.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +2.3% | +2.0% | +10.2% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +1.5% | -7.2% | -12.1% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | -6.8% | -1.2% | -6.5% | +13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | -2.3% | -4.4% | -5.3% | -8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -108.3% | -4.4% | -34.6% | +13.3% | -109.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NCSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 95% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NCSM's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $1.9B | $427M | $58M | $105M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $2.2B | $791M | $371M | $81M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.58x | 84.10x | -7.88x | -0.79x | 4.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.82x | 41.66x | — | — | 8.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.82x | 10.70x | 337.01x | 5.71x | 4.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 1.34x | — | 0.09x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 1.88x | — | — | 0.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.04x | — | — | — | 4.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NCSM leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NCSM delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $2 for WTTR. NCSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WTTR's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NCSM scores 6/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | +2.2% | — | — | +14.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.3% | -11.5% | -21.3% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +2.3% | +0.7% | -9.4% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +2.9% | +0.9% | -11.4% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.40x | — | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27M | $356M | $364M | $313M | -$24M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $18M | $18M | $6M | $37M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $225M | $374M | $383M | $318M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.15x | 1.54x | 0.24x | -0.67x | 28.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,717 for KLXE. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs NCSM's +28.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NINE at 35.7% vs KLXE's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.1% | +52.9% | +2682.5% | +68.0% | +0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +101.3% | +134.2% | +1505.8% | +65.5% | +28.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.3% | +135.9% | +150.0% | -68.3% | +104.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | +158.4% | +385.2% | -72.8% | +51.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.4% | +26.6% | -62.3% | -97.6% | -90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.3% | +33.1% | +35.7% | -31.8% | +27.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NINE and NCSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 1.09x | 3.21x | 0.76x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.73 | $17.95 | $10.23 | $4.06 | $87.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.57 | $7.20 | $0.00 | $1.46 | $28.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +93.7% | +96.3% | +80.3% | +45.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.3 | 69.4 | 82.9 | 56.9 | 27.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.7M | 125K | 307K | 38K |
Analyst Outlook
WTTR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XPRO as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy", NINE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -4.9% for WTTR (target: $16). WTTR is the only dividend payer here at 1.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.50 | $16.00 | $18.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 14 | 9 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
NCSM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NINE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
XPRO vs WTTR vs NINE vs KLXE vs NCSM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XPRO or WTTR or NINE or KLXE or NCSM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Expro Group Holdings N. V. (XPRO) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XPRO or WTTR or NINE or KLXE or NCSM?
On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 1x. On forward P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XPRO or WTTR or NINE or KLXE or NCSM?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -72. 8% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTTR returned +26. 6% versus KLXE's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XPRO or WTTR or NINE or KLXE or NCSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 1058% more volatile than NCSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 40% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XPRO or WTTR or NINE or KLXE or NCSM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XPRO leads at 7. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XPRO or WTTR or NINE or KLXE or NCSM?
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -12. 1% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPRO leads at 7. 2% versus -4. 8% for KLXE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NCSM leads at 38. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XPRO or WTTR or NINE or KLXE or NCSM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 33. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — XPRO or WTTR or NINE or KLXE or NCSM?
In this comparison, WTTR (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. XPRO, NINE, KLXE, NCSM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XPRO or WTTR or NINE or KLXE or NCSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28)). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCSM: -90. 0%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XPRO and WTTR and NINE and KLXE and NCSM?
These companies operate in different sectors (XPRO (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities) and NINE (Energy) and KLXE (Energy) and NCSM (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XPRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WTTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NINE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KLXE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock. WTTR pays a dividend while XPRO, NINE, KLXE, NCSM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.