Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XRX vs NTNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
XRX vs NTNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $310M | $12.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.41B | $2.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.04B | $267M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 87.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 8.0% |
| Forward P/E | 5.1x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.25B | $1.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $512M | $770M |
XRX vs NTNX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xerox Holdings Corp… (XRX) | 100 | 14.9 | -85.1% |
| Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) | 100 | 190.9 | +90.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XRX vs NTNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XRX is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 25.1x)
- 23.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
NTNX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.81
- Rev growth 18.1%, EPS growth 227.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 24.1% 10Y total return vs XRX's -42.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.1% revenue growth vs XRX's 12.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 25.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.9% margin vs XRX's -14.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs XRX's 2.68 | |
| Dividends | 23.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -37.7% vs XRX's -53.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs XRX's -10.8%, ROIC 6.9% vs -1.0% |
XRX vs NTNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XRX vs NTNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XRX is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.4B annually — 2.8x NTNX's $2.7B. NTNX is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XRX's -14.1%. On growth, XRX holds the edge at +26.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.4B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $330M | $288M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.0B | $267M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $267M | $777M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +87.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +8.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.1% | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.7% | +10.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.3% | +89.5% |
Valuation Metrics
XRX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, XRX's 14.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NTNX's 53.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $310M | $12.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $13.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.29x | 70.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.14x | 25.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.71x | 53.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 4.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.20x | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTNX leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTNX scores 6/9 vs XRX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -142.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.8% | +8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.31x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $713M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $512M | $770M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.2B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.14x | 12.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTNX five years ago would be worth $16,048 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,593 for XRX. Over the past 12 months, NTNX leads with a -37.7% total return vs XRX's -53.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTNX at 23.3% vs XRX's -33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | -9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.5% | -37.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.5% | +87.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.1% | +60.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.4% | +24.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.4% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NTNX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTNX is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XRX's 2.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTNX currently trades 55.1% from its 52-week high vs XRX's 34.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.68x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.80 | $83.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.19 | $34.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.9% | +55.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.8 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XRX as "Sell" and NTNX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 332.5% upside for XRX (target: $10) vs 29.8% for NTNX (target: $60). XRX is the only dividend payer here at 23.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.25 | $59.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +23.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% |
NTNX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
XRX vs NTNX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XRX or NTNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the stronger pick with 18. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 9% for Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX). Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) offers the better valuation at 70. 7x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XRX or NTNX?
On forward P/E, Xerox Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 5.
1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XRX or NTNX?
Over the past 5 years, Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) delivered a total return of +60. 5%, compared to -74. 1% for Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTNX returned +24. 1% versus XRX's -42. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XRX or NTNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Xerox Holdings Corporation's 2. 68β — meaning XRX is approximately 230% more volatile than NTNX relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — XRX or NTNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is pulling ahead at 18. 1% versus 12. 9% for Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nutanix, Inc. grew EPS 227. 5% year-over-year, compared to 23. 3% for Xerox Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTNX leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XRX or NTNX?
Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -14. 7% for Xerox Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTNX leads at 6. 8% versus -0. 8% for XRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTNX leads at 86. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XRX or NTNX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX) trades at 5.
1x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for Nutanix, Inc. — 20. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XRX: 332. 5% to $10. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — XRX or NTNX?
In this comparison, XRX (23.
7% yield) pays a dividend. NTNX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XRX or NTNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81)). Xerox Holdings Corporation (XRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTNX: +24. 1%, XRX: -42. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XRX and NTNX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XRX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NTNX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. XRX pays a dividend while NTNX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare NTNX vs CVLT
CVLT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to NTNX.
Compare XRX vs HPQ
HPQ overlaps with XRX in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With PSTG + NTAP
PSTG and NTAP are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.