Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XTIA vs JOBY vs ACHR vs WKHS vs TDG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Aerospace & Defense
Auto - Manufacturers
Aerospace & Defense
XTIA vs JOBY vs ACHR vs WKHS vs TDG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense | Auto - Manufacturers | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $411K | $9.83B | $4.67B | $32M | $70.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $78M | $300K | $11M | $9.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-61M | $-957M | $-618M | $-64M | $1.97B |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 11.2% | — | -236.8% | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | -9.5% | -10.2% | -2431.0% | -5.6% | 46.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 32.0x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $61M | $42M | $16M | $30.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $241M | $1.02B | $4M | $2.81B |
XTIA vs JOBY vs ACHR vs WKHS vs TDG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 86.5 | -13.5% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 62.4 | -37.6% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 200.7 | +100.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XTIA vs JOBY vs ACHR vs WKHS vs TDG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XTIA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JOBY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 391.8% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5%
Among these 5 stocks, ACHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WKHS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +236.1% vs ACHR's -26.6%
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.3%
- Rev growth 11.2%, EPS growth 25.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.6%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs JOBY's -4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 3.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs ACHR's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | 13.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +236.1% vs ACHR's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs XTIA's -127.3%, ROIC 20.9% vs -177.5% |
XTIA vs JOBY vs ACHR vs WKHS vs TDG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
XTIA vs JOBY vs ACHR vs WKHS vs TDG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDG leads in 4 of 6 categories
XTIA leads 1 • JOBY leads 0 • ACHR leads 0 • WKHS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 30363.3x ACHR's $300,000. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%. On growth, XTIA holds the edge at +170.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $78M | $300,000 | $11M | $9.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$43M | -$759M | -$709M | -$52M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$61M | -$957M | -$618M | -$64M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | -$661M | -$512M | -$33M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +11.2% | — | -2.4% | +59.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | -10.2% | -2431.0% | -5.6% | +46.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.3% | -12.3% | -2060.7% | -6.1% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | -8.5% | -1705.7% | -3.1% | +20.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +170.6% | — | — | -5.0% | +13.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.2% | -9.1% | +43.5% | +95.9% | -13.1% |
Valuation Metrics
XTIA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $411,219 | $9.8B | $4.7B | $32M | $70.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$621,781 | $9.6B | $3.7B | $44M | $97.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -8.85x | -6.34x | -0.07x | 38.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 32.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 21.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 183.94x | 9999.00x | 4.83x | 7.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 5.86x | 1.78x | 0.16x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 38.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TDG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACHR delivers a -37.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-38 in annual profit, vs $-5 for XTIA. ACHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XTIA's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDG scores 6/9 vs WKHS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | -74.2% | -37.8% | -198.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -127.3% | -52.1% | -32.9% | -60.6% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -177.5% | -54.7% | -89.6% | -77.6% | +20.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | -49.8% | -44.3% | -107.9% | +20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.04x | 0.02x | 0.37x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$180M | -$979M | $12M | $27.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $241M | $1.0B | $4M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $61M | $42M | $16M | $30.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -74.17x | — | — | -3.84x | 2.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ACHR and TDG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TDG five years ago would be worth $24,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for XTIA. Over the past 12 months, WKHS leads with a +236.1% total return vs ACHR's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACHR at 43.2% vs XTIA's -93.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.6% | -30.4% | -22.8% | -34.7% | -8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.3% | +55.7% | -26.6% | +236.1% | -3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +128.7% | +193.5% | -98.6% | +86.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1.0% | -36.3% | -99.8% | +140.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -4.8% | -37.0% | -99.8% | +595.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.8% | +31.8% | +43.2% | -75.9% | +23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
TDG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDG is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHR's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TDG currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs XTIA's 24.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 2.70x | 2.96x | 1.46x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.43 | $20.95 | $14.62 | $11.80 | $1623.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.22 | $6.32 | $4.80 | $0.53 | $1123.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.4% | +47.7% | +43.0% | +30.8% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 65.5 | 61.5 | 72.7 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 24.7M | 27.6M | 167K | 370K |
Analyst Outlook
TDG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOBY as "Hold", ACHR as "Buy", TDG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 96.3% upside for ACHR (target: $12) vs 30.3% for TDG (target: $1618). TDG is the only dividend payer here at 13.32% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.90 | $12.33 | — | $1617.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 9 | — | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +13.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $165.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +0.7% |
TDG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XTIA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
XTIA vs JOBY vs ACHR vs WKHS vs TDG: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XTIA or JOBY or ACHR or WKHS or TDG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (32. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — XTIA or JOBY or ACHR or WKHS or TDG?
Over the past 5 years, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) delivered a total return of +140.
2%, compared to -100. 0% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TDG returned +595. 3% versus XTIA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — XTIA or JOBY or ACHR or WKHS or TDG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Archer Aviation Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning ACHR is approximately 276% more volatile than TDG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 47% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — XTIA or JOBY or ACHR or WKHS or TDG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XTI Aerospace, Inc. grew EPS 89. 7% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDG leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — XTIA or JOBY or ACHR or WKHS or TDG?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is XTIA or JOBY or ACHR or WKHS or TDG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACHR: 96.
3% to $12. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — XTIA or JOBY or ACHR or WKHS or TDG?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
3% yield) pays a dividend. XTIA, JOBY, ACHR, WKHS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is XTIA or JOBY or ACHR or WKHS or TDG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 13. 3% yield, +595. 3% 10Y return). Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +595. 3%, ACHR: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between XTIA and JOBY and ACHR and WKHS and TDG?
These companies operate in different sectors (XTIA (Industrials) and JOBY (Industrials) and ACHR (Industrials) and WKHS (Consumer Cyclical) and TDG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XTIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. TDG pays a dividend while XTIA, JOBY, ACHR, WKHS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.