Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs GFF vs DHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Conglomerates
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs GFF vs DHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Conglomerates | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $27.49B | $12.76B | $4.41B | $4.22B | $124.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.09B | $4.20B | $2.18B | $2.35B | $24.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $973M | $671M | $150M | $35M | $3.69B |
| Gross Margin | 38.6% | 40.9% | 35.2% | 42.6% | 60.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.6% | 20.6% | 12.6% | 8.3% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | 20.9x | 14.8x | 21.8x | 17.3x | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.94B | $1.64B | $280M | $1.59B | $18.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.48B | $102M | $100M | $99M | $4.62B |
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs GFF vs DHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 174.3 | +74.3% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 201.8 | +101.8% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 197.0 | +97.0% |
| Griffon Corporation (GFF) | 100 | 580.8 | +480.8% |
| Danaher Corporation (DHR) | 100 | 118.9 | +18.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs GFF vs DHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XYL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.4%
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 7.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.8%
- PEG 0.91 vs DHR's 34.35
- 5.5% revenue growth vs GFF's -3.9%
PNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 16.0% margin vs GFF's 1.5%
- 9.9% ROA vs GFF's 1.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs 9.1%
FELE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92 vs GFF's 1.36, lower leverage
GFF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs FELE's 231.4%
- +34.7% vs PNR's -12.8%
Among these 5 stocks, DHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs GFF's -3.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.91 vs 34.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.0% margin vs GFF's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs GFF's 1.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs PNR's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs GFF's 1.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs 9.1% |
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs GFF vs DHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs GFF vs DHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DHR leads in 1 of 6 categories
FELE leads 1 • GFF leads 1 • XYL leads 0 • PNR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.8B annually — 11.4x FELE's $2.2B. PNR is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFF's 1.5%. On growth, FELE holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.1B | $4.2B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $24.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $983M | $322M | $241M | $7.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $973M | $671M | $150M | $35M | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $966M | $716M | $169M | $294M | $5.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.6% | +40.9% | +35.2% | +42.6% | +60.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +20.6% | +12.6% | +8.3% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +16.0% | +6.9% | +1.5% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +17.0% | +7.8% | +12.5% | +21.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +2.6% | +9.9% | -31.0% | +3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +12.9% | +13.4% | -65.3% | +9.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PNR and GFF each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 76% valuation discount to GFF's 83.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYL offers better value at 1.29x vs DHR's 34.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.5B | $12.8B | $4.4B | $4.2B | $124.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.9B | $14.3B | $4.6B | $5.7B | $138.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.50x | 19.94x | 30.75x | 83.18x | 34.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.91x | 14.75x | 21.77x | 17.30x | 20.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.29x | 1.52x | 3.53x | 4.67x | 34.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.54x | 14.66x | 13.82x | 21.23x | 18.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.04x | 3.06x | 2.07x | 1.68x | 5.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.40x | 3.38x | 3.41x | 57.22x | 2.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.21x | 17.11x | 22.81x | 13.91x | 23.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GFF delivers a 40.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for DHR. XYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GFF's 21.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs FELE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +17.7% | +11.4% | +40.8% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | +9.9% | +7.6% | +1.7% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +12.1% | +14.7% | +9.1% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +15.0% | +18.1% | +11.0% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.42x | 0.21x | 21.52x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $463M | $1.5B | $181M | $1.5B | $13.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $102M | $100M | $99M | $4.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $1.6B | $280M | $1.6B | $18.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.32x | 11.94x | 24.75x | 2.30x | 18.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GFF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GFF five years ago would be worth $36,532 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,893 for DHR. Over the past 12 months, GFF leads with a +34.7% total return vs PNR's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GFF at 46.7% vs DHR's -5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.3% | -24.6% | +3.6% | +21.1% | -23.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.2% | -12.8% | +17.7% | +34.7% | -8.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.9% | +39.8% | +10.0% | +215.8% | -15.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.6% | +23.0% | +20.3% | +265.3% | -21.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.7% | +126.9% | +231.4% | +558.1% | +219.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.8% | +11.8% | +3.2% | +46.7% | -5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FELE and GFF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FELE is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GFF's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GFF currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs PNR's 69.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 1.22x | 0.92x | 1.36x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $154.27 | $113.95 | $111.53 | $97.58 | $242.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $114.15 | $77.02 | $83.42 | $65.01 | $172.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +69.3% | +89.6% | +92.9% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 35.3 | 54.8 | 63.3 | 33.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.6M | 281K | 348K | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XYL and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XYL as "Hold", PNR as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", GFF as "Buy", DHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs 0.1% for FELE (target: $100). For income investors, XYL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.39% vs DHR's 0.70%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $151.57 | $113.56 | $100.00 | $111.50 | $247.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 41 | 11 | 7 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.3% | +1.1% | +0.9% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 6 | 32 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.60 | $0.99 | $1.11 | $0.85 | $1.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.8% | +3.8% | +4.3% | +2.5% |
DHR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FELE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs GFF vs DHR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XYL or PNR or FELE or GFF or DHR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xylem Inc.
(XYL) is the stronger pick with 5. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Griffon Corporation (GFF). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Griffon Corporation (GFF) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XYL or PNR or FELE or GFF or DHR?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.
9x versus Griffon Corporation at 83. 2x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Xylem Inc. wins at 0. 91x versus Danaher Corporation's 34. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XYL or PNR or FELE or GFF or DHR?
Over the past 5 years, Griffon Corporation (GFF) delivered a total return of +265.
3%, compared to -21. 1% for Danaher Corporation (DHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GFF returned +558. 1% versus PNR's +126. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XYL or PNR or FELE or GFF or DHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Griffon Corporation's 1. 36β — meaning GFF is approximately 49% more volatile than FELE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xylem Inc. (XYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 22% for Griffon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XYL or PNR or FELE or GFF or DHR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xylem Inc.
(XYL) is pulling ahead at 5. 5% versus -3. 9% for Griffon Corporation (GFF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xylem Inc. grew EPS 7. 4% year-over-year, compared to -74. 2% for Griffon Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XYL or PNR or FELE or GFF or DHR?
Pentair plc (PNR) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus 2. 0% for Griffon Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DHR leads at 20. 9% versus 8. 2% for GFF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DHR leads at 60. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XYL or PNR or FELE or GFF or DHR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Xylem Inc. (XYL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Danaher Corporation's 34. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 43. 8% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — XYL or PNR or FELE or GFF or DHR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Xylem Inc. (XYL) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 7% for Danaher Corporation (DHR).
09Is XYL or PNR or FELE or GFF or DHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 1% yield, +231. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FELE: +231. 4%, PNR: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XYL and PNR and FELE and GFF and DHR?
These companies operate in different sectors (XYL (Industrials) and PNR (Industrials) and FELE (Industrials) and GFF (Industrials) and DHR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.