Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XZO vs CZWI vs FIS vs HIFS vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
XZO vs CZWI vs FIS vs HIFS vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.25B | $202M | $22.25B | $583M | $10.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $196M | $90M | $11.66B | $217M | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $56M | $14M | $2.67B | $45M | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 49.2% | 54.7% | 37.6% | 30.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | 7.0% | 17.0% | 16.8% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 11.5x | 6.9x | 19.0x | 21.1x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $52M | $4.01B | $1.50B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $305M | $119M | $599M | $352M | $102M |
XZO vs CZWI vs FIS vs HIFS vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 285.7 | +185.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 31.0 | -69.0% |
| Hingham Institution… (HIFS) | 100 | 162.7 | +62.7% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.0 | -20.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XZO vs CZWI vs FIS vs HIFS vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XZO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 62.0%, EPS growth 135.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.3%
- 62.0% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- 28.7% margin vs HIFS's 13.0%
- 18.7% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 154.8% 10Y total return vs HIFS's 128.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.45, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- NIM 2.9% vs HIFS's 1.0%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.28 vs CZWI's 2.27
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 21.1x), PEG 0.28 vs 2.10
- 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, HIFS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JKHY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 1.6%
- Beta 0.21 vs HIFS's 1.25
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 62.0% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 21.1x), PEG 0.28 vs 2.10 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.7% margin vs HIFS's 13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs HIFS's 1.25 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.0% vs FIS's -43.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.7% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8% |
XZO vs CZWI vs FIS vs HIFS vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
XZO vs CZWI vs FIS vs HIFS vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
XZO leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • HIFS leads 0 • JKHY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — XZO and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 129.4x CZWI's $90M. XZO is the more profitable business, keeping 28.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIFS's 13.0%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $196M | $90M | $11.7B | $217M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $9M | $3.4B | $62M | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $56M | $14M | $2.7B | $45M | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $49M | $11M | $2.7B | $30M | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.2% | +54.7% | +37.6% | +30.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +7.0% | +17.0% | +16.8% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.7% | +16.0% | +22.9% | +13.0% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +11.5% | +23.6% | +5.4% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +30.1% | — | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +63.0% | +30.6% | +195.1% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, CZWI trades at a 75% valuation discount to FIS's 57.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JKHY offers better value at 2.30x vs CZWI's 2.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $202M | $22.2B | $583M | $10.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $953M | $135M | $25.7B | $1.7B | $10.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.82x | 14.38x | 57.39x | 20.79x | 23.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.67x | 11.54x | 6.86x | 19.02x | 21.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.84x | 2.35x | — | 2.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.75x | 15.19x | 7.05x | 46.37x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.77x | 2.24x | 2.08x | 2.68x | 4.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.92x | 1.08x | 1.61x | 1.36x | 4.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.84x | 19.48x | 7.92x | 49.59x | 17.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XZO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XZO delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. XZO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIFS's 3.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XZO scores 7/9 vs HIFS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.9% | +7.8% | +18.4% | +9.8% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.7% | +0.8% | +7.5% | +1.0% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.0% | +6.0% | +1.4% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +78.9% | +0.6% | +6.6% | +2.2% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.28x | 0.29x | 3.47x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$298M | -$67M | $3.4B | $1.1B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $305M | $119M | $599M | $352M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $52M | $4.0B | $1.5B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.16x | 15.37x | 0.44x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,974 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,567 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +43.0% total return vs FIS's -43.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 40.3% vs FIS's -4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.3% | +21.7% | -33.7% | -1.0% | -18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.3% | +43.0% | -43.4% | +2.4% | -19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | +176.4% | -12.7% | +47.3% | -2.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | +69.7% | -64.3% | -3.0% | +0.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | +154.8% | -19.1% | +128.8% | +92.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.9% | +40.3% | -4.4% | +13.8% | -0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIFS's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CZWI currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 52.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.45x | 0.65x | 1.25x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.82 | $22.62 | $82.74 | $338.00 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.10 | $12.83 | $41.63 | $220.76 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.2% | +92.8% | +52.0% | +79.0% | +74.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.5 | 60.4 | 32.7 | 38.5 | 33.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 203K | 39K | 5.7M | 49K | 916K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 56.0% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 34.5% for JKHY (target: $195). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs HIFS's 0.94%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $67.14 | — | $194.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 37 | — | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | +3.8% | +0.9% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 | $1.63 | $2.50 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.1% | +6.4% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). XZO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
XZO vs CZWI vs FIS vs HIFS vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XZO or CZWI or FIS or HIFS or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is the stronger pick with 62. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XZO or CZWI or FIS or HIFS or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 57. 4x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 28x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XZO or CZWI or FIS or HIFS or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 7%, compared to -64. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +154. 8% versus FIS's -19. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XZO or CZWI or FIS or HIFS or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Hingham Institution for Savings's 1. 25β — meaning HIFS is approximately 485% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exzeo Group, Inc. (XZO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Hingham Institution for Savings — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XZO or CZWI or FIS or HIFS or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is pulling ahead at 62. 0% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exzeo Group, Inc. grew EPS 135. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XZO leads at 61. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XZO or CZWI or FIS or HIFS or JKHY?
Exzeo Group, Inc.
(XZO) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XZO leads at 48. 8% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XZO leads at 58. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XZO or CZWI or FIS or HIFS or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 28x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 1x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 56. 0% to $67. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — XZO or CZWI or FIS or HIFS or JKHY?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
8% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield), JKHY (1. 6% yield), HIFS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. XZO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XZO or CZWI or FIS or HIFS or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 1. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +92. 6%, XZO: -11. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XZO and CZWI and FIS and HIFS and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (XZO (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and HIFS (Financial Services) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XZO is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HIFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CZWI, FIS, HIFS, JKHY pay a dividend while XZO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.