YAAS vs BEKE

For growth investors, KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -41. 8% for Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) offers the better valuation at 36. 3x trailing P/E (3. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) delivered a total return of -61. 6%, compared to -99. 7% for Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEKE returned -47. 8% versus YAAS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Youxin Technology Ltd's 1. 60β — meaning YAAS is approximately 93% more volatile than BEKE relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus -41. 8% for Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Youxin Technology Ltd grew EPS 56. 9% year-over-year, compared to -29. 4% for KE Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEKE leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus -245. 7% for Youxin Technology Ltd — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEKE leads at 4. 0% versus -266. 4% for YAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YAAS leads at 65. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, BEKE (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. YAAS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, KE Holdings Inc.

(BEKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 1. 9% yield). Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BEKE: -47. 8%, YAAS: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (YAAS (Technology) and BEKE (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: YAAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEKE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BEKE pays a dividend while YAAS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.