Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YB vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH vs MKSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Insurance - Diversified
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
YB vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH vs MKSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Insurance - Diversified | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $119M | $3.92B | $2.47B | $595M | $20.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.09B | $901M | $959M | $2.98B | $4.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.26B | $94M | $-51M | $447M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 95.8% | 44.4% | 11.3% | 41.2% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 30.1% | 12.1% | -3.8% | 8.5% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.5x | 29.7x | 62.2x | 8.8x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $303M | $186M | $244M | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.90B | $766M | $98M | $986M | $675M |
YB vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH vs MKSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yuanbao Inc. Americ… (YB) | 100 | 99.3 | -0.7% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 304.1 | +204.1% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 360.1 | +260.1% |
| Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) | 100 | 122.1 | +22.1% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 428.8 | +328.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YB vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH vs MKSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 60.6%, EPS growth 360.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 104.3%
- 60.6% revenue growth vs WDH's 5.4%
- Lower P/E (0.5x vs 30.4x)
- 30.9% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
ACMR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
ICHR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +329.1% vs YB's +5.8%
WDH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.22, yield 3.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 5.0%, current ratio 3.12x
- Beta 1.22, yield 3.9%, current ratio 3.12x
- 3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, MKSI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 60.6% revenue growth vs WDH's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.5x vs 30.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs ICHR's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs ICHR's 3.93 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +329.1% vs YB's +5.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 35.6% ROA vs ICHR's -5.2% |
YB vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
YB vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH vs MKSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
YB leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACMR leads 1 • ICHR leads 0 • WDH leads 0 • MKSI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YB is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 4.5x ACMR's $901M. YB is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, YB holds the edge at +33.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.1B | $901M | $959M | $3.0B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $126M | -$11M | $253M | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $94M | -$51M | $447M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $277M | -$69M | -$17M | $0 | $401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.8% | +44.4% | +11.3% | +41.2% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +12.1% | -3.8% | +8.5% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +10.4% | -5.3% | +15.0% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | -7.6% | -1.7% | +7.9% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.6% | +9.4% | +4.7% | +23.9% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.9% | -76.1% | +46.2% | +66.7% | +53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
YB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.9x trailing earnings, YB trades at a 99% valuation discount to MKSI's 68.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WDH's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $119M | $3.9B | $2.5B | $595M | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$158M | $3.5B | $2.6B | $486M | $24.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.94x | 43.21x | -46.25x | 10.89x | 68.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.49x | 29.68x | 62.25x | 8.79x | 30.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -1.23x | 27.49x | — | 17.25x | 26.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 4.35x | 2.61x | 1.46x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.06x | 3.67x | 0.83x | 7.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.67x | — | — | 18.51x | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YB delivers a 189.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $189 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ICHR. WDH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YB scores 8/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +189.2% | +6.1% | -7.5% | +9.2% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +35.6% | +3.9% | -5.2% | +7.0% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.0% | -3.9% | +3.1% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +63.0% | +6.6% | -4.7% | +3.7% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.16x | 0.28x | 0.05x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.9B | -$463M | $87M | -$742M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $766M | $98M | $986M | $675M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $303M | $186M | $244M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 20.44x | -5.97x | — | 2.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,777 for WDH. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs YB's +5.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs WDH's -15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | +31.9% | +249.0% | -14.5% | +78.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.8% | +195.6% | +329.1% | +29.8% | +306.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | +487.9% | +151.1% | -40.6% | +266.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | +133.4% | +28.9% | -82.2% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.7% | +3065.8% | +629.1% | -82.2% | +750.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.2% | +80.5% | +35.9% | -15.9% | +54.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YB and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YB is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs YB's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 3.24x | 3.93x | 1.22x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.00 | $71.65 | $72.87 | $2.18 | $326.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.04 | $19.26 | $13.12 | $1.24 | $71.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.1% | +82.6% | +97.7% | +73.4% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.6 | 60.7 | 66.9 | 34.8 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 1.2M | 795K | 207K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACMR and WDH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", WDH as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.0% upside for WDH (target: $2) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, WDH offers the higher dividend yield at 3.92% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.00 | $49.80 | $2.00 | $272.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 14 | 3 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | +3.9% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | — | $0.43 | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +2.6% | +0.2% |
YB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
YB vs ACMR vs ICHR vs WDH vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YB or ACMR or ICHR or WDH or MKSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) is the stronger pick with 60. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Waterdrop Inc. (WDH). Yuanbao Inc. American Depositary Shares (YB) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YB or ACMR or ICHR or WDH or MKSI?
On trailing P/E, Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) is the cheapest at 0. 9x versus MKS Inc. at 68. 8x. On forward P/E, Yuanbao Inc. American Depositary Shares is actually cheaper at 0. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YB or ACMR or ICHR or WDH or MKSI?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -82. 2% for Waterdrop Inc. (WDH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus WDH's -82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YB or ACMR or ICHR or WDH or MKSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 93β — meaning ICHR is approximately 246% more volatile than YB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Waterdrop Inc. (WDH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YB or ACMR or ICHR or WDH or MKSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) is pulling ahead at 60. 6% versus 5. 4% for Waterdrop Inc. (WDH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Yuanbao Inc. American Depositary Shares grew EPS 360. 0% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YB leads at 104. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YB or ACMR or ICHR or WDH or MKSI?
Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 4% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 26. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YB leads at 26. 1% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YB leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YB or ACMR or ICHR or WDH or MKSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) trades at 0. 5x forward P/E versus 62. 2x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 61. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDH: 25. 0% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — YB or ACMR or ICHR or WDH or MKSI?
In this comparison, WDH (3.
9% yield), MKSI (0. 3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. YB, ICHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YB or ACMR or ICHR or WDH or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Waterdrop Inc.
(WDH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), 3. 9% yield). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WDH: -82. 2%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YB and ACMR and ICHR and WDH and MKSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (YB (Financial Services) and ACMR (Technology) and ICHR (Technology) and WDH (Financial Services) and MKSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YB is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WDH is a small-cap deep-value stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WDH pays a dividend while YB, ACMR, ICHR, MKSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.