Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
YDESW vs OCGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
YDESW vs OCGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | — | $487M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $510K | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $-68M |
| Gross Margin | 30.4% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -286.5% | -14.3% |
| Total Debt | $23K | $33M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $19M |
Quick Verdict: YDESW vs OCGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YDESW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 45.8%
- -4.1% 10Y total return vs OCGN's -98.5%
- 45.8% revenue growth vs OCGN's 8.8%
OCGN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.63
- Lower volatility, beta 1.63, current ratio 1.06x
- Beta 1.63, current ratio 1.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.8% revenue growth vs OCGN's 8.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -276.6% margin vs OCGN's -15.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.63 vs YDESW's 2.23 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.5% vs YDESW's -4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -39.3% ROA vs OCGN's -123.4%, ROIC -63.3% vs -15.7% |
YDESW vs OCGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YDESW leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OCGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4M annually — 8.6x YDESW's $510,360. YDESW is the more profitable business, keeping -2.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCGN's -15.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $510,360 | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$57M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -14.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | -15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | -13.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -125.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $487M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $502M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -6.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 110.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
YDESW leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YDESW delivers a -42.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-43 in annual profit, vs $-26 for OCGN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YDESW scores 3/9 vs OCGN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.7% | -26.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -39.3% | -123.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -63.3% | -15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.1% | -154.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $19M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22,555 | $33M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1893.69x | -13.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OCGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YDESW five years ago would be worth $9,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,567 for OCGN. Over the past 12 months, OCGN leads with a +117.5% total return vs YDESW's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OCGN at 26.1% vs YDESW's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.2% | +4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.1% | +117.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | +100.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | -84.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | -98.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.4% | +26.1% |
Risk & Volatility
OCGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OCGN is the less volatile stock with a 1.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than YDESW's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OCGN currently trades 52.8% from its 52-week high vs YDESW's 18.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.23x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.85 | $2.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $0.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.3% | +52.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 9.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% |
YDESW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OCGN leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
YDESW vs OCGN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YDESW or OCGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, YD Bio Limited Warrants (YDESW) is the stronger pick with 45.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for Ocugen, Inc. (OCGN). Analysts rate Ocugen, Inc. (OCGN) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YDESW or OCGN?
Over the past 5 years, YD Bio Limited Warrants (YDESW) delivered a total return of -4.
1%, compared to -84. 3% for Ocugen, Inc. (OCGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YDESW returned -4. 1% versus OCGN's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YDESW or OCGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ocugen, Inc.
(OCGN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 63β versus YD Bio Limited Warrants's 2. 23β — meaning YDESW is approximately 37% more volatile than OCGN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — YDESW or OCGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), YD Bio Limited Warrants (YDESW) is pulling ahead at 45.
8% versus 8. 8% for Ocugen, Inc. (OCGN). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YDESW or OCGN?
YD Bio Limited Warrants (YDESW) is the more profitable company, earning -276.
6% net margin versus -1537. 4% for Ocugen, Inc. — meaning it keeps -276. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YDESW leads at -286. 5% versus -1425. 7% for OCGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OCGN leads at 45. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — YDESW or OCGN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is YDESW or OCGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ocugen, Inc.
(OCGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. YD Bio Limited Warrants (YDESW) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OCGN: -98. 5%, YDESW: -4. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between YDESW and OCGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YDESW is a small-cap high-growth stock; OCGN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare YDESW vs BNTX
BNTX is one of the most direct listed alternatives to YDESW.
Compare OCGN vs REPL
REPL is one of the most direct listed alternatives to OCGN.
Expand With BNTX + NVAX
BNTX and NVAX are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.