Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
YI vs PINC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
YI vs PINC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Pharmaceuticals | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $52M | $2.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.18B | $1.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-74M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 5.0% | 72.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.0% | -0.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.8x |
| Total Debt | $257M | $282M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $462M | $84M |
YI vs PINC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 111, Inc. (YI) | 100 | 8.2 | -91.8% |
| Premier, Inc. (PINC) | 100 | 80.8 | -19.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YI vs PINC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -3.7%, EPS growth 83.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- -3.7% revenue growth vs PINC's -10.9%
- Better valuation composite
PINC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 3.0%
- -4.6% 10Y total return vs YI's -95.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, Low D/E 18.4%, current ratio 0.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.7% revenue growth vs PINC's -10.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.5% margin vs PINC's -2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs YI's 0.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.1% vs YI's -21.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.8% ROA vs YI's -2.7%, ROIC 0.0% vs 1.1% |
YI vs PINC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
YI vs PINC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — YI and PINC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YI is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.2B annually — 14.1x PINC's $1.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.5% (YI) to -2.4% (PINC). On growth, PINC holds the edge at -3.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.2B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $118M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$74M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $265M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +72.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | -0.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +26.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.6% | -70.0% |
Valuation Metrics
YI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, YI's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PINC's 21.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $52M | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.47x | 128.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.82x | 21.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.43x | 7.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PINC delivers a -1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-21 for YI. PINC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to YI's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YI scores 7/9 vs PINC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.4% | -1.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.7% | -0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | +0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | +0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$206M | $198M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $462M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $257M | $282M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.05x | 1.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINC five years ago would be worth $9,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $542 for YI. Over the past 12 months, PINC leads with a +23.1% total return vs YI's -21.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINC at 4.7% vs YI's -39.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +119.2% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.3% | +23.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.2% | +14.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -8.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.6% | -4.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.8% | +4.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PINC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PINC is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than YI's 0.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs YI's 54.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.17 | $28.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.48 | $20.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.2% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.8 | 65.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
PINC is the only dividend payer here at 2.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +17.1% |
YI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PINC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
YI vs PINC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YI or PINC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 111, Inc.
(YI) is the stronger pick with -3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 9% for Premier, Inc. (PINC). Premier, Inc. (PINC) offers the better valuation at 128. 5x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Premier, Inc. (PINC) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YI or PINC?
Over the past 5 years, Premier, Inc.
(PINC) delivered a total return of -8. 6%, compared to -94. 6% for 111, Inc. (YI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PINC returned -4. 6% versus YI's -95. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YI or PINC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus 111, Inc. 's 0. 27β — meaning YI is approximately 30% more volatile than PINC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Premier, Inc. (PINC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 67% for 111, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — YI or PINC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 111, Inc.
(YI) is pulling ahead at -3. 7% versus -10. 9% for Premier, Inc. (PINC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 111, Inc. grew EPS 83. 9% year-over-year, compared to -78. 8% for Premier, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YI leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YI or PINC?
Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 0% net margin versus -0. 4% for 111, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PINC leads at 0. 1% versus 0. 0% for YI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PINC leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — YI or PINC?
In this comparison, PINC (3.
0% yield) pays a dividend. YI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is YI or PINC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Premier, Inc.
(PINC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PINC: -4. 6%, YI: -95. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between YI and PINC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PINC pays a dividend while YI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.