YQ
17 Education & Technology Group Inc.
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.-98.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
YQ vs EDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
EDU
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
Education & Training Services
Market Cap$8.97B
5Y Perf.-69.7%
YQ vs EDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | YQ | EDU |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $22M | $8.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $104M | $4.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-165M | $367M |
| Gross Margin | 43.4% | 55.1% |
| Operating Margin | -171.7% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.2x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $804M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $234M | $1.61B |
YQ vs EDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
YQ
EDU
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Education & Tech… (YQ) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| New Oriental Educat… (EDU) | 100 | 30.3 | -69.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YQ vs EDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EDU leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
YQ
17 Education & Technology Group Inc.
The Income Pick
YQ is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.50
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 3.36x
- Beta 0.50, current ratio 3.36x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
EDU
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
The Growth Play
EDU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 27.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.4%
- 47.3% 10Y total return vs YQ's -98.7%
- 13.6% revenue growth vs YQ's 10.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EDU | 13.6% revenue growth vs YQ's 10.7% |
| Quality / Margins | EDU | 7.4% margin vs YQ's -159.3% |
| Stability / Safety | YQ | Beta 0.50 vs EDU's 0.82, lower leverage |
| Dividends | EDU | 1.1% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | YQ | +35.8% vs EDU's +19.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EDU | 4.8% ROA vs YQ's -32.3%, ROIC 9.9% vs -85.5% |
YQ vs EDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2025
YQ vs EDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEDULAGGINGYQ
YQ17 Education & Techno…
1leads
EDUNew Oriental Educatio…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs YQMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EDU6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
YQ3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EDU6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
EDU5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EDU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EDU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.0B annually — 48.1x YQ's $104M. EDU is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YQ's -159.3%. On growth, EDU holds the edge at +6.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | YQ17 Education & Te… | EDUNew Oriental Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $104M | $5.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$175M | $563M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$165M | $367M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $737M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.4% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -171.7% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -159.3% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -78.5% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.4% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.8% | 0.0% |
EDU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
YQ leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | YQ17 Education & Te… | EDUNew Oriental Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $9.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$11M | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.77x | 24.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.79x | 1.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 2.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.07x |
YQ leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EDU leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EDU delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-46 for YQ. YQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EDU's 0.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EDU scores 7/9 vs YQ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | YQ17 Education & Te… | EDUNew Oriental Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.8% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.3% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -85.5% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.4% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$223M | -$809M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $234M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $804M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1570.90x |
EDU leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EDU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EDU five years ago would be worth $3,854 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $241 for YQ. Over the past 12 months, YQ leads with a +35.8% total return vs EDU's +19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EDU at 11.1% vs YQ's -25.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | YQ17 Education & Te… | EDUNew Oriental Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.9% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +19.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.9% | +37.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -61.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +47.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.7% | +11.1% |
EDU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YQ and EDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDU's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EDU currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs YQ's 42.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | YQ17 Education & Te… | EDUNew Oriental Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.45 | $64.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.70 | $41.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.3% | +86.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.1 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 689K |
Evenly matched — YQ and EDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates YQ as "Sell" and EDU as "Buy". EDU is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | YQ17 Education & Te… | EDUNew Oriental Educ… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $68.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +5.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
EDU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). YQ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallNew Oriental Education & Te… (EDU)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
YQ vs EDU: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YQ or EDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (YQ). New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YQ or EDU?
Over the past 5 years, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) delivered a total return of -61. 5%, compared to -97. 6% for 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (YQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EDU returned +47. 3% versus YQ's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YQ or EDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 17 Education & Technology Group Inc.
(YQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning EDU is approximately 63% more volatile than YQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (YQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 20% for New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — YQ or EDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus 10. 7% for 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. (YQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. grew EPS 29. 4% year-over-year, compared to 27. 8% for New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EDU leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YQ or EDU?
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus -102. 0% for 17 Education & Technology Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EDU leads at 8. 7% versus -113. 0% for YQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDU leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — YQ or EDU?
In this comparison, EDU (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. YQ does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is YQ or EDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDU: +47. 3%, YQ: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between YQ and EDU?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
EDU pays a dividend while YQ does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(YQ: -66.4% · EDU: 6.1%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.