Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZBAI
ATIF Holdings Ltd.

Investment - Banking & Investment Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$142M
5Y Perf.-29.6%
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-65.6%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-18.4%
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-70.9%
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-56.3%

ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZBAI logoZBAI
RCON logoRCON
CLPS logoCLPS
FTFT logoFTFT
CNET logoCNET
IndustryInvestment - Banking & Investment ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - ApplicationAdvertising Agencies
Market Cap$142M$17M$25M$6M$2M
Revenue (TTM)$1M$66M$299M$4M$6M
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$-43M$-4M$-5M$-2M
Gross Margin100.0%23.0%22.8%10.7%4.8%
Operating Margin-70.2%-86.5%-1.4%-8.9%-31.7%
Total Debt$0.00$34M$34M$2M$122K
Cash & Equiv.$9M$99M$28M$2M$812K

ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNETLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZBAI
RCON
CLPS
FTFT
CNET
StockNov 24May 26Return
ATIF Holdings Ltd. (ZBAI)10070.4-29.6%
Recon Technology, L… (RCON)10034.4-65.6%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10081.6-18.4%
Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT)10029.1-70.9%
ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET)10043.7-56.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLPS leads in 5 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. ATIF Holdings Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ZBAI
ATIF Holdings Ltd.
The Banking Pick

ZBAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.

  • -32.2% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
  • Beta 0.49, current ratio 13.45x
  • 93.5% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

RCON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • -1.3% margin vs ZBAI's -383.2%
  • Beta 0.27 vs FTFT's 2.54
  • 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
FTFT
Future FinTech Group Inc.
The Growth Play

FTFT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
Best for: growth exposure
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CNET doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthZBAI logoZBAI93.5% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
Quality / MarginsCLPS logoCLPS-1.3% margin vs ZBAI's -383.2%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs FTFT's 2.54
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CLPS logoCLPS-5.4% vs CNET's -55.1%
Efficiency (ROA)CLPS logoCLPS-3.2% ROA vs ZBAI's -54.6%, ROIC -7.9% vs -11.0%

ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZBAIATIF Holdings Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCONRecon Technology, Ltd.
FY 2025
Automation product and software
75.7%$29M
Oilfield environmental protection
22.6%$9M
Platform Outsourcing Services
1.7%$642,405
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
FTFTFuture FinTech Group Inc.
FY 2023
Other Segments
100.0%$1M
CNETZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
FY 2024
Search Engine Marketing and Data Service
67.5%$10M
Online Advertising Placement
32.5%$5M

ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCLPSLAGGINGCNET

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FTFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 249.3x ZBAI's $1M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -1.3% (CLPS) to -3.8% (ZBAI). On growth, FTFT holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZBAI logoZBAIATIF Holdings Ltd.RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationFTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$66M$299M$4M$6M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$981,120-$54M-$1M-$34M-$2M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M-$43M-$4M-$5M-$2M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M-$44M$0$56.6B-$2M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+23.0%+22.8%+10.7%+4.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-70.2%-86.5%-1.4%-8.9%-31.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.8%-64.3%-1.3%-120.6%-33.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.0%-65.9%-2.3%+14767.2%-27.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.6%+15.3%+110.9%-47.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+62.3%+35.7%+75.8%+100.0%+95.7%
FTFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ZBAI and FTFT and CNET each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricZBAI logoZBAIATIF Holdings Ltd.RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationFTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
Market CapShares × price$142M$17M$25M$6M$2M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$133M$7M$31M$6M$1M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-30.52x-1.22x-3.48x-0.54x-0.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue118.43x1.72x0.15x1.65x0.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share14.71x0.11x0.43x0.06x0.38x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — ZBAI and FTFT and CNET each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CLPS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CLPS delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. CNET carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTFT scores 5/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricZBAI logoZBAIATIF Holdings Ltd.RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationFTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-59.4%-9.2%-6.1%-16.4%-60.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-54.6%-8.0%-3.2%-11.9%-21.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-11.0%-10.6%-7.9%-97.5%-64.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-14.4%-11.8%-9.8%-117.5%-73.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934255
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.59x0.04x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$9M-$64M$6M-$457,223-$690,000
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$99M$28M$2M$812,000
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$34M$34M$2M$122,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-46797.17x-372.30x-228.78x
CLPS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ZBAI five years ago would be worth $6,776 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $55 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs CNET's -55.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs FTFT's -53.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZBAI logoZBAIATIF Holdings Ltd.RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationFTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.4%-45.8%-10.3%+66.7%-44.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-50.8%-49.1%-5.4%-16.1%-55.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.2%-88.7%+0.5%-90.2%-89.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.2%-99.4%-69.3%-99.3%-97.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-32.2%-99.3%-78.5%-98.8%-97.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.2%-51.6%+0.2%-53.9%-52.1%
CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 11.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZBAI logoZBAIATIF Holdings Ltd.RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationFTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.49x0.47x0.27x2.54x1.18x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.80$7.16$1.88$4.03$2.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.14$0.75$0.80$0.56$0.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+41.6%+11.7%+48.2%+31.0%+25.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.942.549.846.450.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6K90K15K108K11K
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricZBAI logoZBAIATIF Holdings Ltd.RCON logoRCONRecon Technology,…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationFTFT logoFTFTFuture FinTech Gr…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1310
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CLPS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FTFT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallCLPS Incorporation (CLPS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ATIF Holdings Ltd.

(ZBAI) is the stronger pick with 93. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET?

Over the past 5 years, ATIF Holdings Ltd.

(ZBAI) delivered a total return of -32. 2%, compared to -99. 4% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZBAI returned -32. 2% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning FTFT is approximately 835% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ATIF Holdings Ltd.

(ZBAI) is pulling ahead at 93. 5% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Future FinTech Group Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPS leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET?

CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the more profitable company, earning -4.

3% net margin versus -383. 2% for ATIF Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLPS leads at -4. 0% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZBAI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield) pays a dividend. ZBAI, RCON, FTFT, CNET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 6% yield). Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, FTFT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between ZBAI and RCON and CLPS and FTFT and CNET?

These companies operate in different sectors (ZBAI (Financial Services) and RCON (Energy) and CLPS (Technology) and FTFT (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ZBAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while ZBAI, RCON, FTFT, CNET do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ZBAI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 46%
  • Gross Margin > 60%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCON

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FTFT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CNET

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ZBAI and RCON and CLPS and FTFT and CNET on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ZBAI: 93.5% · RCON: 2.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.