Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Information Technology Services
Software - Application
Advertising Agencies
ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $142M | $17M | $25M | $6M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $66M | $299M | $4M | $6M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-43M | $-4M | $-5M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 23.0% | 22.8% | 10.7% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | -70.2% | -86.5% | -1.4% | -8.9% | -31.7% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $34M | $34M | $2M | $122K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $99M | $28M | $2M | $812K |
ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATIF Holdings Ltd. (ZBAI) | 100 | 70.4 | -29.6% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 34.4 | -65.6% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 81.6 | -18.4% |
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 100 | 29.1 | -70.9% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZBAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- -32.2% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
- Beta 0.49, current ratio 13.45x
- 93.5% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
RCON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- -1.3% margin vs ZBAI's -383.2%
- Beta 0.27 vs FTFT's 2.54
- 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
FTFT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
Among these 5 stocks, CNET doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 93.5% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.3% margin vs ZBAI's -383.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs FTFT's 2.54 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.4% vs CNET's -55.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.2% ROA vs ZBAI's -54.6%, ROIC -7.9% vs -11.0% |
ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLPS leads in 4 of 6 categories
FTFT leads 1 • ZBAI leads 0 • RCON leads 0 • CNET leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FTFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 249.3x ZBAI's $1M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -1.3% (CLPS) to -3.8% (ZBAI). On growth, FTFT holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $66M | $299M | $4M | $6M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$981,120 | -$54M | -$1M | -$34M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$43M | -$4M | -$5M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$44M | $0 | $56.6B | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +23.0% | +22.8% | +10.7% | +4.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -70.2% | -86.5% | -1.4% | -8.9% | -31.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -64.3% | -1.3% | -120.6% | -33.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -65.9% | -2.3% | +14767.2% | -27.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.6% | +15.3% | +110.9% | -47.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.3% | +35.7% | +75.8% | +100.0% | +95.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ZBAI and FTFT and CNET each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $142M | $17M | $25M | $6M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $133M | $7M | $31M | $6M | $1M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.52x | -1.22x | -3.48x | -0.54x | -0.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 118.43x | 1.72x | 0.15x | 1.65x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.71x | 0.11x | 0.43x | 0.06x | 0.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLPS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLPS delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. CNET carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FTFT scores 5/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.4% | -9.2% | -6.1% | -16.4% | -60.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.6% | -8.0% | -3.2% | -11.9% | -21.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.0% | -10.6% | -7.9% | -97.5% | -64.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.4% | -11.8% | -9.8% | -117.5% | -73.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x | 0.59x | 0.04x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$64M | $6M | -$457,223 | -$690,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $99M | $28M | $2M | $812,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $34M | $34M | $2M | $122,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -46797.17x | -372.30x | — | -228.78x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZBAI five years ago would be worth $6,776 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $55 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs CNET's -55.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs FTFT's -53.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.4% | -45.8% | -10.3% | +66.7% | -44.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.8% | -49.1% | -5.4% | -16.1% | -55.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.2% | -88.7% | +0.5% | -90.2% | -89.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.2% | -99.4% | -69.3% | -99.3% | -97.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.2% | -99.3% | -78.5% | -98.8% | -97.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.2% | -51.6% | +0.2% | -53.9% | -52.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 11.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.47x | 0.27x | 2.54x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.80 | $7.16 | $1.88 | $4.03 | $2.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.14 | $0.75 | $0.80 | $0.56 | $0.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.6% | +11.7% | +48.2% | +31.0% | +25.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 42.5 | 49.8 | 46.4 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 90K | 15K | 108K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLPS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FTFT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ZBAI vs RCON vs CLPS vs FTFT vs CNET: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ATIF Holdings Ltd.
(ZBAI) is the stronger pick with 93. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET?
Over the past 5 years, ATIF Holdings Ltd.
(ZBAI) delivered a total return of -32. 2%, compared to -99. 4% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZBAI returned -32. 2% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning FTFT is approximately 835% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ATIF Holdings Ltd.
(ZBAI) is pulling ahead at 93. 5% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Future FinTech Group Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPS leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET?
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the more profitable company, earning -4.
3% net margin versus -383. 2% for ATIF Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLPS leads at -4. 0% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZBAI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ZBAI, RCON, FTFT, CNET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ZBAI or RCON or CLPS or FTFT or CNET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, FTFT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ZBAI and RCON and CLPS and FTFT and CNET?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZBAI (Financial Services) and RCON (Energy) and CLPS (Technology) and FTFT (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZBAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while ZBAI, RCON, FTFT, CNET do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.