Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZBH vs SYK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$16.25B
5Y Perf.-32.3%
SYK
Stryker Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$113.08B
5Y Perf.+61.0%

ZBH vs SYK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZBH logoZBH
SYK logoSYK
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$16.25B$113.08B
Revenue (TTM)$8.41B$25.12B
Net Income (TTM)$761M$3.25B
Gross Margin70.0%63.5%
Operating Margin15.6%22.4%
Forward P/E9.8x19.7x
Total Debt$7.52B$14.86B
Cash & Equiv.$592M$4.01B

ZBH vs SYKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZBH
SYK
StockMay 20May 26Return
Zimmer Biomet Holdi… (ZBH)10067.7-32.3%
Stryker Corporation (SYK)100161.0+61.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZBH vs SYK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SYK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZBH
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ZBH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 59.2%, current ratio 1.98x
  • Beta 0.65, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.98x
  • Lower P/E (9.8x vs 19.7x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
SYK
Stryker Corporation
The Income Pick

SYK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.1%
  • Rev growth 11.2%, EPS growth 8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.8%
  • 191.1% 10Y total return vs ZBH's -17.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSYK logoSYK11.2% revenue growth vs ZBH's 7.2%
ValueZBH logoZBHLower P/E (9.8x vs 19.7x)
Quality / MarginsSYK logoSYK12.9% margin vs ZBH's 9.1%
Stability / SafetySYK logoSYKBeta 0.55 vs ZBH's 0.65
DividendsZBH logoZBH1.2% yield, vs SYK's 1.1%
Momentum (1Y)ZBH logoZBH-7.2% vs SYK's -21.7%
Efficiency (ROA)SYK logoSYK6.9% ROA vs ZBH's 3.3%, ROIC 11.4% vs 5.4%

ZBH vs SYK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Knees
43.9%$3.3B
S E T
28.4%$2.2B
Hips
27.7%$2.1B
SYKStryker Corporation
FY 2025
MedSurg
62.3%$15.6B
Orthopaedics
37.7%$9.5B

ZBH vs SYK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSYKLAGGINGZBH

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 3.0x ZBH's $8.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.9% (SYK) to 9.1% (ZBH).

MetricZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8.4B$25.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.3B$6.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$761M$3.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.8B$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.0%+63.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.6%+22.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.1%+12.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.8%+17.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.3%+11.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+34.1%+56.0%
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ZBH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 23.4x trailing earnings, ZBH trades at a 33% valuation discount to SYK's 35.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ZBH's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SYK's 20.4x.

MetricZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$16.3B$113.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$23.2B$123.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS23.38x35.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.79x19.69x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.44x20.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.97x4.50x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.30x5.03x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.04x26.40x
ZBH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SYK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SYK delivers a 15.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for ZBH. ZBH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYK's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SYK scores 6/9 vs ZBH's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.8%+15.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.3%+6.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.4%+11.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.9%+13.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.59x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6.9B$10.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$592M$4.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7.5B$14.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.08x6.72x
SYK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SYK five years ago would be worth $12,274 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,214 for ZBH. Over the past 12 months, ZBH leads with a -7.2% total return vs SYK's -21.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYK at 2.3% vs ZBH's -14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-7.5%-14.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-7.2%-21.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.7%+7.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.9%+22.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-17.8%+191.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.6%+2.3%
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ZBH and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZBH's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZBH currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs SYK's 72.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x0.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$108.29$404.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$79.83$290.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.7%+72.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.520.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.2M2.0M
Evenly matched — ZBH and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ZBH and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates ZBH as "Hold" and SYK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.7% upside for SYK (target: $404) vs 17.9% for ZBH (target: $98). For income investors, ZBH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.15% vs SYK's 1.14%.

MetricZBH logoZBHZimmer Biomet Hol…SYK logoSYKStryker Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$97.90$403.69
# AnalystsCovering analysts4250
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises034
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.96$3.36
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — ZBH and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SYK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZBH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallStryker Corporation (SYK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZBH vs SYK: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZBH or SYK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger pick with 11.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stryker Corporation (SYK) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ZBH or SYK?

On trailing P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.

(ZBH) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Stryker Corporation at 35. 1x. On forward P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ZBH or SYK?

Over the past 5 years, Stryker Corporation (SYK) delivered a total return of +22.

7%, compared to -47. 9% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SYK returned +191. 1% versus ZBH's -17. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ZBH or SYK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

55β versus Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning ZBH is approximately 19% more volatile than SYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 66% for Stryker Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ZBH or SYK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is pulling ahead at 11.

2% versus 7. 2% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stryker Corporation grew EPS 8. 2% year-over-year, compared to -19. 9% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYK leads at 10. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ZBH or SYK?

Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more profitable company, earning 12.

9% net margin versus 8. 6% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYK leads at 19. 5% versus 16. 5% for ZBH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SYK leads at 64. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ZBH or SYK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.

(ZBH) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 7x for Stryker Corporation — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SYK: 36. 7% to $403. 69.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ZBH or SYK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 1. 1% for Stryker Corporation (SYK).

09

Is ZBH or SYK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

55), 1. 1% yield, +191. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +191. 1%, ZBH: -17. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ZBH and SYK?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ZBH

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SYK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ZBH and SYK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ZBH: 9.3% · SYK: 11.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(ZBH: 9.1% · SYK: 12.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ZBH: 23.4x · SYK: 35.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.