Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ZBIO logo
ZBIO
KYMR logo
KYMR
JPM logo
JPM
PRAX logo
PRAX
IMVT logo
IMVT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs PRAX vs IMVT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZBIO
Zenas BioPharma, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$884M
5Y Perf.+17.0%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.04B
5Y Perf.+82.1%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+52.1%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.+363.2%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+17.9%

ZBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs PRAX vs IMVT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZBIO logoZBIO
KYMR logoKYMR
JPM logoJPM
PRAX logoPRAX
IMVT logoIMVT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$884M$7.04B$896.00B$7.70B$6.90B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$51M$280.33B$0.00$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-425M$-315M$57.05B$-327M$-506M
Gross Margin100.0%33.2%60.0%
Operating Margin-21.1%-7.0%25.9%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$80M$82M$942.38B$110K$72K
Cash & Equiv.$111M$357M$343.34B$357M$902M

ZBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs PRAX vs IMVTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZBIO
KYMR
JPM
PRAX
IMVT
StockSep 24Jun 26Return
Zenas BioPharma, In… (ZBIO)100117.0+17.0%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100182.1+82.1%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100152.1+52.1%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)100463.2+363.2%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100117.9+17.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs PRAX vs IMVT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Zenas BioPharma, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. KYMR and PRAX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ZBIO
Zenas BioPharma, Inc.
The Growth Leader

ZBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 100.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

KYMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.91
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.91, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.91 vs IMVT's 1.66
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 237.9%
  • 20.4% margin vs ZBIO's -37.8%
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +491.9% vs JPM's +21.8%
Best for: momentum
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthZBIO logoZBIO100.0% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs ZBIO's -37.8%
Stability / SafetyKYMR logoKYMRBeta 0.91 vs IMVT's 1.66
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs ZBIO's -97.4%, ROIC 4.5% vs -154.5%

ZBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs PRAX vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZBIOZenas BioPharma, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ZBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs PRAX vs IMVT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZBIO's -37.8%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$51M$280.3B$0$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$423M-$352M$81.4B-$357M-$532M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$425M-$315M$57.0B-$327M-$506M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$210M-$244M$100.9B-$283M-$407M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+33.2%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-21.1%-7.0%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-37.8%-6.1%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-17.2%-4.7%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+55.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-82.5%+13.4%+16.0%+2.7%-14.1%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$884M$7.0B$896.0B$7.7B$6.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$853M$6.8B$1.50T$7.3B$6.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.35x-23.36x16.00x-19.77x-12.14x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue88.39x179.54x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.66x4.61x2.47x6.83x7.19x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-168 for ZBIO. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-167.7%-25.0%+15.9%-43.0%-68.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-97.4%-22.3%+1.3%-40.2%-62.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-154.5%-24.9%+4.5%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-66.7%-27.2%+8.9%-49.3%-68.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934532
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.33x0.05x2.60x0.00x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$31M-$275M$599.0B-$357M-$902M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$111M$357M$343.3B$357M$902M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$80M$82M$942.4B$110,000$72,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-62.50x-2119.53x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,580 for PRAX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs ZBIO's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-42.6%+18.5%-0.5%-6.9%+29.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+74.9%+82.3%+21.8%+491.9%+110.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+10.2%+242.9%+138.2%+1757.4%+55.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+10.2%+70.4%+118.2%-14.2%+213.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+10.2%+159.2%+465.8%-36.1%+237.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.3%+50.8%+33.6%+164.8%+15.7%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KYMR and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs ZBIO's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.31x0.91x0.94x1.55x1.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$44.60$103.00$337.25$366.52$36.27
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.91$36.65$262.71$37.19$14.32
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+44.4%+83.7%+95.1%+72.7%+92.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.156.859.131.957.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded522K492K7.0M396K1.9M
Evenly matched — KYMR and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ZBIO as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricZBIO logoZBIOZenas BioPharma, …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$112.60$339.75$607.15$43.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts526611623
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZBIO vs KYMR vs JPM vs PRAX vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZBIO or KYMR or JPM or PRAX or IMVT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Zenas BioPharma, Inc.

(ZBIO) is the stronger pick with 100. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zenas BioPharma, Inc. (ZBIO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ZBIO or KYMR or JPM or PRAX or IMVT?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -14. 2% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus PRAX's -36. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ZBIO or KYMR or JPM or PRAX or IMVT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately 81% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ZBIO or KYMR or JPM or PRAX or IMVT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zenas BioPharma, Inc.

(ZBIO) is pulling ahead at 100. 0% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -124. 5% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ZBIO or KYMR or JPM or PRAX or IMVT?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -37. 8% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -21. 1% for ZBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZBIO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ZBIO or KYMR or JPM or PRAX or IMVT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 127.

8% to $607. 15.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ZBIO or KYMR or JPM or PRAX or IMVT?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. ZBIO, KYMR, PRAX, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is ZBIO or KYMR or JPM or PRAX or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, PRAX: -36. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ZBIO and KYMR and JPM and PRAX and IMVT?

These companies operate in different sectors (ZBIO (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and PRAX (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ZBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while ZBIO, KYMR, PRAX, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.