Steel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ZEUS vs CMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Steel
ZEUS vs CMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Steel |
| Market Cap | $533M | $8.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.90B | $8.01B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $438M |
| Gross Margin | 82.8% | 16.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.7x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $313M | $1.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $1.04B |
ZEUS vs CMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) | 100 | 433.9 | +333.9% |
| Commercial Metals C… (CMC) | 100 | 448.0 | +348.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZEUS vs CMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZEUS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 54.5%, current ratio 4.38x
- Beta 1.48, yield 1.2%, current ratio 4.38x
CMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth -82.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.4%
- 345.8% 10Y total return vs ZEUS's 125.3%
- -1.6% revenue growth vs ZEUS's -10.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.6% revenue growth vs ZEUS's -10.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 20.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs ZEUS's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.48 vs CMC's 1.53 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CMC's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.6% vs ZEUS's +51.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs ZEUS's 1.3%, ROIC 8.5% vs 4.3% |
ZEUS vs CMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZEUS vs CMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.0B annually — 4.2x ZEUS's $1.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.5% (CMC) to 0.7% (ZEUS). On growth, CMC holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $8.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $890M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $438M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $42M | $296M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.8% | +16.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.7% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ZEUS and CMC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.3x trailing earnings, ZEUS trades at a 75% valuation discount to CMC's 97.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CMC's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZEUS's 10.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $533M | $8.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $834M | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.29x | 97.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.72x | 11.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.59x | 10.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 1.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 1.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 127.14x | 25.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CMC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMC delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $2 for ZEUS. CMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZEUS's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZEUS scores 5/9 vs CMC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $301M | $311M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $313M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.15x | 9.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CMC five years ago would be worth $23,411 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,386 for ZEUS. Over the past 12 months, CMC leads with a +60.6% total return vs ZEUS's +51.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMC at 18.7% vs ZEUS's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.1% | +1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +51.1% | +60.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.1% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.9% | +134.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.3% | +345.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.8% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ZEUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZEUS is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMC's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZEUS currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs CMC's 85.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.65 | $84.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.11 | $44.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +85.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47 | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ZEUS and CMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZEUS as "Buy" and CMC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.7% upside for CMC (target: $83) vs -14.3% for ZEUS (target: $41). For income investors, ZEUS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs CMC's 0.99%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $82.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.6% |
CMC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZEUS leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
ZEUS vs CMC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZEUS or CMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is the stronger pick with -1.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZEUS or CMC?
On trailing P/E, Olympic Steel, Inc.
(ZEUS) is the cheapest at 24. 3x versus Commercial Metals Company at 97. 5x. On forward P/E, Commercial Metals Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZEUS or CMC?
Over the past 5 years, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) delivered a total return of +134.
1%, compared to +53. 9% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMC returned +345. 8% versus ZEUS's +125. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZEUS or CMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Olympic Steel, Inc.
(ZEUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Commercial Metals Company's 1. 53β — meaning CMC is approximately 4% more volatile than ZEUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 55% for Olympic Steel, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZEUS or CMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is pulling ahead at -1.
6% versus -10. 0% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Olympic Steel, Inc. grew EPS -48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -82. 1% for Commercial Metals Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMC leads at -4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZEUS or CMC?
Olympic Steel, Inc.
(ZEUS) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 2% net margin versus 1. 1% for Commercial Metals Company — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMC leads at 6. 7% versus 2. 5% for ZEUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZEUS leads at 23. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZEUS or CMC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) trades at 11.
0x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Olympic Steel, Inc. — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMC: 14. 7% to $82. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZEUS or CMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 1. 0% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC).
09Is ZEUS or CMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
0% yield, +345. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMC: +345. 8%, ZEUS: +125. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZEUS and CMC?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.