Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZEUS vs CMC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZEUS
Olympic Steel, Inc.

Steel

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$533M
5Y Perf.+333.9%
CMC
Commercial Metals Company

Steel

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.01B
5Y Perf.+348.0%

ZEUS vs CMC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZEUS logoZEUS
CMC logoCMC
IndustrySteelSteel
Market Cap$533M$8.01B
Revenue (TTM)$1.90B$8.01B
Net Income (TTM)$14M$438M
Gross Margin82.8%16.5%
Operating Margin1.9%7.5%
Forward P/E20.7x11.0x
Total Debt$313M$1.35B
Cash & Equiv.$12M$1.04B

ZEUS vs CMCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZEUS
CMC
StockMay 20Feb 26Return
Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS)100433.9+333.9%
Commercial Metals C… (CMC)100448.0+348.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZEUS vs CMC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CMC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Olympic Steel, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZEUS
Olympic Steel, Inc.
The Income Pick

ZEUS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 1.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 54.5%, current ratio 4.38x
  • Beta 1.48, yield 1.2%, current ratio 4.38x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
The Growth Play

CMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth -82.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.4%
  • 345.8% 10Y total return vs ZEUS's 125.3%
  • -1.6% revenue growth vs ZEUS's -10.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCMC logoCMC-1.6% revenue growth vs ZEUS's -10.0%
ValueCMC logoCMCLower P/E (11.0x vs 20.7x)
Quality / MarginsCMC logoCMC5.5% margin vs ZEUS's 0.7%
Stability / SafetyZEUS logoZEUSBeta 1.48 vs CMC's 1.53
DividendsZEUS logoZEUS1.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CMC's 1.0%
Momentum (1Y)CMC logoCMC+60.6% vs ZEUS's +51.1%
Efficiency (ROA)CMC logoCMC4.7% ROA vs ZEUS's 1.3%, ROIC 8.5% vs 4.3%

ZEUS vs CMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZEUSOlympic Steel, Inc.
FY 2024
Carbon Flat Products
57.1%$1.1B
Specialty Metals Flat Products
25.6%$497M
Tubular and Pipe Products
17.3%$336M
CMCCommercial Metals Company
FY 2025
Steel Products
42.2%$3.3B
Downstream Products
29.3%$2.3B
Raw Material Products
17.0%$1.3B
Other Product
4.2%$326M
Construction Products
3.9%$304M
Ground Stabilization Products
3.4%$262M

ZEUS vs CMC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCMCLAGGINGZEUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.0B annually — 4.2x ZEUS's $1.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.5% (CMC) to 0.7% (ZEUS). On growth, CMC holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$8.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$45M$890M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$14M$438M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$42M$296M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+82.8%+16.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.9%+7.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.7%+5.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.2%+3.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.4%+11.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.7%+2.0%
CMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ZEUS and CMC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 24.3x trailing earnings, ZEUS trades at a 75% valuation discount to CMC's 97.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CMC's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZEUS's 10.6x.

MetricZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
Market CapShares × price$533M$8.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$834M$8.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS24.29x97.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.72x11.03x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.58x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.59x10.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.27x1.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.97x1.96x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF127.14x25.65x
Evenly matched — ZEUS and CMC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CMC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CMC delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $2 for ZEUS. CMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZEUS's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZEUS scores 5/9 vs CMC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.4%+10.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.3%+8.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.6%+8.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.55x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$301M$311M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$12M$1.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$313M$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.15x9.84x
CMC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CMC five years ago would be worth $23,411 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,386 for ZEUS. Over the past 12 months, CMC leads with a +60.6% total return vs ZEUS's +51.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMC at 18.7% vs ZEUS's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.1%+1.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+51.1%+60.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.1%+67.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+53.9%+134.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+125.3%+345.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.8%+18.7%
CMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ZEUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ZEUS is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMC's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZEUS currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs CMC's 85.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.48x1.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$52.65$84.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.11$44.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.9%+85.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.258.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded471.1M
ZEUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ZEUS and CMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates ZEUS as "Buy" and CMC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.7% upside for CMC (target: $83) vs -14.3% for ZEUS (target: $41). For income investors, ZEUS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs CMC's 0.99%.

MetricZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$41.00$82.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts626
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises34
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.57$0.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.6%
Evenly matched — ZEUS and CMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CMC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZEUS leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallCommercial Metals Company (CMC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZEUS vs CMC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZEUS or CMC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is the stronger pick with -1.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) offers the better valuation at 24. 3x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ZEUS or CMC?

On trailing P/E, Olympic Steel, Inc.

(ZEUS) is the cheapest at 24. 3x versus Commercial Metals Company at 97. 5x. On forward P/E, Commercial Metals Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ZEUS or CMC?

Over the past 5 years, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) delivered a total return of +134.

1%, compared to +53. 9% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMC returned +345. 8% versus ZEUS's +125. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ZEUS or CMC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Olympic Steel, Inc.

(ZEUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 48β versus Commercial Metals Company's 1. 53β — meaning CMC is approximately 4% more volatile than ZEUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 55% for Olympic Steel, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ZEUS or CMC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is pulling ahead at -1.

6% versus -10. 0% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Olympic Steel, Inc. grew EPS -48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -82. 1% for Commercial Metals Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMC leads at -4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ZEUS or CMC?

Olympic Steel, Inc.

(ZEUS) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 2% net margin versus 1. 1% for Commercial Metals Company — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMC leads at 6. 7% versus 2. 5% for ZEUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZEUS leads at 23. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ZEUS or CMC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) trades at 11.

0x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Olympic Steel, Inc. — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMC: 14. 7% to $82. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ZEUS or CMC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 1. 0% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC).

09

Is ZEUS or CMC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

0% yield, +345. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMC: +345. 8%, ZEUS: +125. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ZEUS and CMC?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

ZEUS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 49%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CMC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ZEUS and CMC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ZEUS: 4.4% · CMC: 11.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ZEUS: 24.3x · CMC: 97.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.