Steel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ZKIN vs NX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
ZKIN vs NX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Construction |
| Market Cap | $8M | $916M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $179M | $1.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-240M |
| Gross Margin | 5.9% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | -10.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $854M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $76M |
ZKIN vs NX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZK International Gr… (ZKIN) | 100 | 19.2 | -80.8% |
| Quanex Building Pro… (NX) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZKIN vs NX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZKIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.53, Low D/E 95.8%, current ratio 1.44x
- -3.8% margin vs NX's -13.0%
- Lower D/E ratio (95.8% vs 117.6%)
NX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 43.8%, EPS growth -7.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 23.7% 10Y total return vs ZKIN's -97.5%
- Beta 1.89, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.04x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs ZKIN's -34.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.8% margin vs NX's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (95.8% vs 117.6%) | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.3% vs NX's +23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.3% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC -4.4% vs -8.8% |
ZKIN vs NX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZKIN vs NX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 10.3x ZKIN's $179M. ZKIN is the more profitable business, keeping -3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NX's -13.0%. On growth, NX holds the edge at +2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $179M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$240M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $191,770 | $95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.5% | +2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.7% | +71.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ZKIN and NX each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $916M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28M | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.07x | -3.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.33x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.93x | 8.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZKIN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZKIN delivers a -25.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-25 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NX. ZKIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NX's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NX scores 4/9 vs ZKIN's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.1% | -30.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.3% | -11.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | -8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.2% | -10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 1.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | $778M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $854M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.31x | -3.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NX five years ago would be worth $7,802 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $380 for ZKIN. Over the past 12 months, ZKIN leads with a +28.3% total return vs NX's +23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NX at 2.0% vs ZKIN's -34.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.8% | +31.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.3% | +23.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.3% | +6.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | -22.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | +23.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.0% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZKIN and NX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZKIN is the less volatile stock with a -0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NX's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NX currently trades 87.3% from its 52-week high vs ZKIN's 32.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.53x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.47 | $22.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.03 | $11.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.4% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 458K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
NX is the only dividend payer here at 1.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
NX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ZKIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ZKIN vs NX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZKIN or NX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is the stronger pick with 43.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -34. 2% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. (ZKIN). Analysts rate Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZKIN or NX?
Over the past 5 years, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) delivered a total return of -22.
0%, compared to -96. 2% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. (ZKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NX returned +23. 7% versus ZKIN's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZKIN or NX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZK International Group Co.
, Ltd. (ZKIN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 53β versus Quanex Building Products Corporation's 1. 89β — meaning NX is approximately -455% more volatile than ZKIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. (ZKIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 96% versus 118% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ZKIN or NX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is pulling ahead at 43.
8% versus -34. 2% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. (ZKIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. grew EPS -23. 5% year-over-year, compared to -703. 3% for Quanex Building Products Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NX leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZKIN or NX?
ZK International Group Co.
, Ltd. (ZKIN) is the more profitable company, earning -5. 6% net margin versus -13. 6% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — meaning it keeps -5. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZKIN leads at -3. 5% versus -10. 6% for NX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NX leads at 27. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ZKIN or NX?
In this comparison, NX (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ZKIN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ZKIN or NX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZK International Group Co.
, Ltd. (ZKIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 53)). Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZKIN: -97. 5%, NX: +23. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ZKIN and NX?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZKIN (Basic Materials) and NX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NX is a small-cap high-growth stock. NX pays a dividend while ZKIN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.