Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ZOOZ logo
ZOOZ
BTBT logo
BTBT
MSTR logo
MSTR
MARA logo
MARA
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZOOZ
ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$45M
5Y Perf.-90.4%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$628M
5Y Perf.-5.4%
MSTR
Strategy Inc

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$43.79B
5Y Perf.+23.1%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.58B
5Y Perf.-8.8%

ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZOOZ logoZOOZ
BTBT logoBTBT
MSTR logoMSTR
MARA logoMARA
IndustryElectrical Equipment & PartsFinancial - Capital MarketsSoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$45M$628M$43.79B$5.58B
Revenue (TTM)$1M$116M$490M$868M
Net Income (TTM)$-69M$-169M$-12.36B$-2.04B
Gross Margin-268.8%46.7%68.1%0.3%
Operating Margin-26.4%101.8%94.2%16.9%
Forward P/E2.6x
Total Debt$724K$134M$8.28B$3.65B
Cash & Equiv.$27M$122M$2.30B$547M

ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZOOZ
BTBT
MSTR
MARA
StockApr 24Jun 26Return
ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ)1009.6-90.4%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10094.6-5.4%
Strategy Inc (MSTR)100123.1+23.1%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10091.2-8.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MARA leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Bit Digital, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. ZOOZ and MSTR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇MARA emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ZOOZ
ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

ZOOZ is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.09, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 9.85x
  • Beta 2.09 vs BTBT's 3.70, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • -146.0% margin vs ZOOZ's -52.9%
  • -0.1% ROA vs ZOOZ's -172.2%, ROIC -5.8% vs -83.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
MSTR
Strategy Inc
The Income Pick

MSTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.85, yield 1.0%
  • Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth -151.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.5%
  • 6.1% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -58.2%
  • Beta 2.85, yield 1.0%, current ratio 5.62x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MARA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.

  • 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs ZOOZ's -76.3%
  • Better valuation composite
  • -4.4% vs ZOOZ's -67.3%
Best for: growth and value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMARA logoMARA38.2% NII/revenue growth vs ZOOZ's -76.3%
ValueMARA logoMARABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT-146.0% margin vs ZOOZ's -52.9%
Stability / SafetyZOOZ logoZOOZBeta 2.09 vs BTBT's 3.70, lower leverage
DividendsMSTR logoMSTR1.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MARA logoMARA-4.4% vs ZOOZ's -67.3%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT-0.1% ROA vs ZOOZ's -172.2%, ROIC -5.8% vs -83.0%

ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Crypto Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Crypto Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
ZOOZZOOZ Strategy Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Revenue Member
100.0%$1M
MSTRStrategy Inc
FY 2025
Product Licenses And Subscription Services
50.0%$215M
Subscription And Circulation
40.8%$176M
License
9.2%$40M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M

ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSTRLAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — BTBT and MSTR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $868M annually — 666.3x ZOOZ's $1M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -146.0% (BTBT) to -52.9% (ZOOZ). On growth, MSTR holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZOOZ logoZOOZZOOZ Strategy Ltd.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$116M$490M$868M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$34M$162M$480M$953M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$69M-$169M-$12.4B-$2.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$24M-$170.8B$7.6B-$385M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-2.7%+46.7%+68.1%+0.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-26.4%+101.8%+94.2%+16.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-52.9%-146.0%-25.2%-2.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-18.5%-1473.2%+15.5%-44.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+11.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.9%-40.6%-132.0%-113.5%
Evenly matched — BTBT and MSTR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ZOOZ and BTBT and MSTR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricZOOZ logoZOOZZOOZ Strategy Ltd.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Market CapShares × price$45M$628M$43.8B$5.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$19M$640M$49.8B$8.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.52x-6.23x-8.61x-3.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.2.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue184.00x5.53x91.76x6.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.24x5.75x0.76x1.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
Evenly matched — ZOOZ and BTBT and MSTR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ZOOZ and BTBT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a -0.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ZOOZ. ZOOZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZOOZ scores 5/9 vs BTBT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricZOOZ logoZOOZZOOZ Strategy Ltd.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.0%-0.1%-24.1%-51.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-172.2%-0.1%-19.4%-28.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-83.0%-5.8%-9.9%-9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-83.5%-7.2%-12.6%-12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95133
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.16x0.16x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$26M$12M$6.0B$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$27M$122M$2.3B$547M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$724,000$134M$8.3B$3.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-11.31x0.01x9.05x12.66x
Evenly matched — ZOOZ and BTBT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MSTR five years ago would be worth $20,799 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $684 for ZOOZ. Over the past 12 months, MARA leads with a -4.4% total return vs ZOOZ's -67.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 67.7% vs ZOOZ's -59.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZOOZ logoZOOZZOOZ Strategy Ltd.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-42.7%-5.4%-16.6%+47.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-67.3%-26.3%-65.7%-4.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.2%-37.9%+371.9%+56.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.2%-77.6%+108.0%-52.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.2%-58.2%+609.3%-64.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-59.1%-14.7%+67.7%+16.1%
MSTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ZOOZ and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ZOOZ is the less volatile stock with a 2.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 62.4% from its 52-week high vs ZOOZ's 5.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZOOZ logoZOOZZOOZ Strategy Ltd.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.09x3.70x2.85x3.32x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$101.20$4.55$457.22$23.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.47$1.25$104.17$6.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+5.5%+42.4%+28.7%+62.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.946.437.256.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded159K23.2M16.4M41.4M
Evenly matched — ZOOZ and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 210.9% upside for BTBT (target: $6) vs -14.6% for MARA (target: $13). MSTR is the only dividend payer here at 0.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricZOOZ logoZOOZZOOZ Strategy Ltd.BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.MSTR logoMSTRStrategy IncMARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.00$251.60$12.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts22920
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises001
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00$1.30
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.8%
MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MSTR leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Total Returns and Analyst Outlook. 4 categories are tied.

Best OverallStrategy Inc (MSTR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -76. 3% for ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ). Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA?

Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +108.

0%, compared to -93. 2% for ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +609. 3% versus ZOOZ's -93. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.

(ZOOZ) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 09β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 70β — meaning BTBT is approximately 77% more volatile than ZOOZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus -76. 3% for ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Strategy Inc grew EPS -151. 3% year-over-year, compared to -886. 2% for ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning -70. 7% net margin versus -225. 1% for ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. — meaning it keeps -70. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at -49. 8% versus -215. 1% for ZOOZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSTR leads at 68. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 210.

9% to $6. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA?

In this comparison, MSTR (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. ZOOZ, BTBT, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

0% yield, +609. 3% 10Y return). ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +609. 3%, ZOOZ: -93. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ZOOZ and BTBT and MSTR and MARA?

These companies operate in different sectors (ZOOZ (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ZOOZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. MSTR pays a dividend while ZOOZ, BTBT, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.