Electrical Equipment & Parts
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
Banks - Diversified
ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $45M | $628M | $43.79B | $5.58B | $892.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $116M | $490M | $868M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-69M | $-169M | $-12.36B | $-2.04B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | -268.8% | 46.7% | 68.1% | 0.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -26.4% | 101.8% | 94.2% | 16.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 2.6x | — | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $724K | $134M | $8.28B | $3.65B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $122M | $2.30B | $547M | $343.34B |
ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 94.6 | -5.4% |
| Strategy Inc (MSTR) | 100 | 123.1 | +23.1% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 91.2 | -8.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 166.6 | +66.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZOOZ is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.09, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 9.85x
Among these 5 stocks, BTBT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MSTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs JPM's 475.6%
- Lower P/E (2.6x vs 14.3x)
MARA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs ZOOZ's -76.3%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- NIM 2.2% vs MARA's 0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs ZOOZ's -76.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.6x vs 14.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs ZOOZ's -52.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs BTBT's 3.70 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs ZOOZ's -67.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs ZOOZ's -172.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -83.0% |
ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSTR leads in 3 of 6 categories
JPM leads 3 • ZOOZ leads 0 • BTBT leads 0 • MARA leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 215226.9x ZOOZ's $1M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZOOZ's -52.9%. On growth, MSTR holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $116M | $490M | $868M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$34M | $162M | $480M | $953M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$69M | -$169M | -$12.4B | -$2.0B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | -$170.8B | $7.6B | -$385M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +46.7% | +68.1% | +0.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | +101.8% | +94.2% | +16.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -52.9% | -146.0% | -25.2% | -2.3% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -18.5% | -1473.2% | +15.5% | -44.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | +11.9% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.9% | -40.6% | -132.0% | -113.5% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MSTR leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $628M | $43.8B | $5.6B | $892.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $640M | $49.8B | $8.7B | $1.49T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.52x | -6.23x | -8.61x | -3.97x | 15.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 2.62x | — | 14.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 184.00x | 5.53x | 91.76x | 6.15x | 3.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.24x | 5.75x | 0.76x | 1.50x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 8.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ZOOZ. ZOOZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZOOZ scores 5/9 vs BTBT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.0% | -0.1% | -24.1% | -51.7% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -172.2% | -0.1% | -19.4% | -28.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -83.0% | -5.8% | -9.9% | -9.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -83.5% | -7.2% | -12.6% | -12.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.16x | 0.16x | 1.05x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$26M | $12M | $6.0B | $3.1B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $122M | $2.3B | $547M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $724,000 | $134M | $8.3B | $3.6B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.31x | 0.01x | 9.05x | 12.66x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $22,071 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $684 for ZOOZ. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +20.3% total return vs ZOOZ's -67.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSTR at 67.7% vs ZOOZ's -59.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.7% | -5.4% | -16.6% | +47.7% | -0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.3% | -26.3% | -65.7% | -4.4% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | -37.9% | +371.9% | +56.4% | +133.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | -77.6% | +108.0% | -52.3% | +120.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | -58.2% | +609.3% | -64.8% | +475.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.1% | -14.7% | +67.7% | +16.1% | +32.7% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs ZOOZ's 5.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.09x | 3.70x | 2.85x | 3.32x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $101.20 | $4.55 | $457.22 | $23.45 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $1.25 | $104.17 | $6.66 | $266.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.5% | +42.4% | +28.7% | +62.4% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 46.4 | 37.2 | 56.3 | 65.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 159K | 23.2M | 16.4M | 41.4M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MSTR as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 210.9% upside for BTBT (target: $6) vs -14.6% for MARA (target: $13). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs MSTR's 0.99%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $251.60 | $12.50 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 29 | 20 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +1.0% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | $1.30 | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +3.9% |
MSTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JPM leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).
ZOOZ vs BTBT vs MSTR vs MARA vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -76. 3% for ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or JPM?
On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 2.
6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +120. 7%, compared to -93. 2% for ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSTR returned +609. 3% versus ZOOZ's -93. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 70β — meaning BTBT is approximately 292% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus -76. 3% for ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -886. 2% for ZOOZ Strategy Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -225. 1% for ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -215. 1% for ZOOZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSTR leads at 68. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 2.
6x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 210. 9% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), MSTR (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. ZOOZ, BTBT, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZOOZ or BTBT or MSTR or MARA or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +475. 6% 10Y return). ZOOZ Strategy Ltd. (ZOOZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +475. 6%, ZOOZ: -93. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZOOZ and BTBT and MSTR and MARA and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZOOZ (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MSTR (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZOOZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. MSTR, JPM pay a dividend while ZOOZ, BTBT, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.