Financial - Conglomerates
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ACOG vs BIIB vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Banks - Diversified
ACOG vs BIIB vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Conglomerates | Drug Manufacturers - General | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $98M | $29.53B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $9.86B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $1.37B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 86.4% | 69.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -250.1% | 15.6% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $6.95B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $3.01B | $343.34B |
ACOG vs BIIB vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Cognition Inc… (ACOG) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 128.4 | +28.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACOG vs BIIB vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACOG is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 2.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
BIIB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
- Beta 0.40, current ratio 2.68x
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 14.4x)
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs ACOG's -11.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs ACOG's -116.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs ACOG's -232.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs ACOG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.2% vs ACOG's -34.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs ACOG's -41.8%, ROIC 6.5% vs -32.4% |
ACOG vs BIIB vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACOG vs BIIB vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 25895.8x ACOG's $11M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACOG's -2.3%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $9.9B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $2.4B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $1.4B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$30M | $2.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +86.4% | +69.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +15.6% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +13.9% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +26.6% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -146.2% | +31.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 29% valuation discount to BIIB's 22.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIIB's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $98M | $29.5B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32M | $33.5B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.38x | 22.66x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.69x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.90x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.57x | 3.01x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 1.61x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.40x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIIB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-54 for ACOG. BIIB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIIB scores 5/9 vs ACOG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -54.1% | +7.5% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.8% | +4.7% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.4% | +6.5% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.4% | +7.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.38x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | $3.9B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $3.0B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $6.9B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.91x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,926 for BIIB. Over the past 12 months, BIIB leads with a +51.2% total return vs ACOG's -34.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs BIIB's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.1% | +12.5% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.4% | +51.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -36.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -50.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.3% | -18.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.9% | -13.9% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIIB is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACOG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs ACOG's 54.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 0.40x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.54 | $205.97 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.50 | $121.05 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.6% | +97.1% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 57.5 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 1.1M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACOG as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 122.2% upside for ACOG (target: $14) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $218.16 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BIIB leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
ACOG vs BIIB vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACOG or BIIB or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock (ACOG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACOG or BIIB or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Biogen Inc. at 22. 7x. On forward P/E, Biogen Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACOG or BIIB or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -50. 7% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus BIIB's -18. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACOG or BIIB or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock's 1. 29β — meaning ACOG is approximately 218% more volatile than BIIB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Biogen Inc. (BIIB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACOG or BIIB or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus 1. 4% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 42. 1% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACOG or BIIB or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -202. 2% for Alpha Cognition Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -221. 7% for ACOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACOG leads at 81. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACOG or BIIB or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACOG: 122. 2% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACOG or BIIB or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ACOG, BIIB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACOG or BIIB or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ACOG: -11. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACOG and BIIB and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACOG (Financial Services) and BIIB (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACOG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while ACOG, BIIB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.