Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ANL logo
ANL
ZYME logo
ZYME
IMVT logo
IMVT
RCUS logo
RCUS
KYMR logo
KYMR
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ANL vs ZYME vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ANL
Adlai Nortye Ltd.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$322M
5Y Perf.-31.2%
ZYME
Zymeworks Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.68B
5Y Perf.+260.9%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.-12.4%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.+32.6%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.04B
5Y Perf.+520.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+47.6%

ANL vs ZYME vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ANL logoANL
ZYME logoZYME
IMVT logoIMVT
RCUS logoRCUS
KYMR logoKYMR
KO logoKO
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$322M$1.68B$6.90B$2.40B$7.04B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$6M$81M$0.00$236M$51M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$-54M$-103M$-506M$-369M$-315M$13.70B
Gross Margin100.0%94.4%90.7%33.2%61.7%
Operating Margin-10.0%-140.4%-168.6%-7.0%29.3%
Forward P/E15.5x25.3x
Total Debt$27M$18M$72K$99M$82M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$61M$41M$902M$222M$357M$10.27B

ANL vs ZYME vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ANL
ZYME
IMVT
RCUS
KYMR
KO
StockSep 23Jun 26Return
Adlai Nortye Ltd. (ANL)10068.8-31.2%
Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME)100360.9+260.9%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10087.6-12.4%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)100132.6+32.6%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100620.2+520.2%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100147.6+47.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ANL vs ZYME vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ZYME and KO are tied at the top with 3 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. ANL also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ANL
Adlai Nortye Ltd.
The Momentum Pick

ANL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +5.5% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: momentum
ZYME
Zymeworks Inc.
The Income Pick

ZYME carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.87
  • Rev growth 38.9%, EPS growth 33.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -36.4%
  • 38.9% revenue growth vs ANL's -100.0%
  • Lower P/E (15.5x vs 25.3x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 159.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 6 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.91, current ratio 10.47x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs ANL's -8.3%
  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 13.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthZYME logoZYME38.9% revenue growth vs ANL's -100.0%
ValueZYME logoZYMELower P/E (15.5x vs 25.3x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs ANL's -8.3%
Stability / SafetyZYME logoZYMEBeta 0.87 vs RCUS's 2.00, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ANL logoANL+5.5% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

ANL vs ZYME vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ANLAdlai Nortye Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

ZYMEZymeworks Inc.
FY 2025
Milestone Revenue
61.6%$25M
Option Exercise Fee
18.5%$8M
Research Support Payments And Other Service
13.8%$6M
Royalty
6.1%$2M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

ANL vs ZYME vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGKYMR

Who Leads Where

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories

ANL leads 0 • ZYME leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • KYMR leads 0 • 2 tied

Explore the data ↓
KYMRKymera Therapeutics, …
0leads
RCUSArcus Biosciences, In…
0leads
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.
0leads
ZYMEZymeworks Inc.
0leads
ANLAdlai Nortye Ltd.
0leads
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
3leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ANL's -8.3%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricANL logoANLAdlai Nortye Ltd.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6M$81M$0$236M$51M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$64M-$118M-$532M-$391M-$352M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$54M-$103M-$506M-$369M-$315M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$67M-$45.7B-$407M-$489M-$244M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+94.4%+90.7%+33.2%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-10.0%-140.4%-168.6%-7.0%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.3%-126.3%-156.4%-6.1%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-10.3%-563.0%-2.1%-4.7%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-91.1%-39.3%+55.5%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+78.7%-96.7%-14.1%+10.5%+13.4%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ZYME and RCUS and KYMR and KO each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricANL logoANLAdlai Nortye Ltd.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$322M$1.7B$6.9B$2.4B$7.0B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$289M$1.7B$6.0B$2.3B$6.8B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.11x-21.19x-12.14x-7.23x-23.36x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.46x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue15.89x9.70x179.54x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.31x6.42x7.19x4.05x4.61x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x
Evenly matched — ZYME and RCUS and KYMR and KO each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-101 for ANL. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricANL logoANLAdlai Nortye Ltd.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-101.3%-0.2%-68.2%-69.0%-25.0%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-50.2%-0.1%-62.2%-35.3%-22.3%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.3%-25.9%-64.1%-24.9%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-103.8%-27.3%-68.3%-42.1%-27.2%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9252047
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.07x0.07x0.00x0.16x0.05x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$34M-$23M-$902M-$123M-$275M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$61M$41M$902M$222M$357M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$27M$18M$72,000$99M$82M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-28.22x-52.03x-13.38x-2119.53x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — ANL and IMVT and KYMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,029 for ZYME. Over the past 12 months, ANL leads with a +545.0% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 50.8% vs ANL's -11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricANL logoANLAdlai Nortye Ltd.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+647.8%-14.0%+29.8%+2.2%+18.5%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+545.0%+74.7%+110.9%+154.5%+82.3%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-31.2%+173.7%+55.0%+18.3%+242.9%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-31.2%-39.7%+213.0%-3.1%+70.4%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-31.2%+76.0%+237.9%+40.0%+159.2%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.7%+39.9%+15.7%+5.8%+50.8%+13.7%
Evenly matched — ANL and IMVT and KYMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ANL's 59.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricANL logoANLAdlai Nortye Ltd.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.39x0.87x1.66x2.00x0.91x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.25$29.75$36.27$28.72$103.00$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.88$11.51$14.32$7.91$36.65$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+59.8%+76.9%+92.7%+82.9%+83.7%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.036.757.946.556.860.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded380K584K1.9M1.1M492K12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ANL as "Buy", ZYME as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 151.9% upside for ANL (target: $26) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricANL logoANLAdlai Nortye Ltd.ZYME logoZYMEZymeworks Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$26.00$40.67$43.67$31.00$112.60$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts12023182648
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises56
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ANL vs ZYME vs IMVT vs RCUS vs KYMR vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ANL or ZYME or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Zymeworks Inc.

(ZYME) is the stronger pick with 38. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Adlai Nortye Ltd. (ANL). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Adlai Nortye Ltd. (ANL) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ANL or ZYME or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or KO?

On forward P/E, Zymeworks Inc.

is actually cheaper at 15. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ANL or ZYME or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -39. 7% for Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus ANL's -31. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ANL or ZYME or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately -1098% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ANL or ZYME or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zymeworks Inc.

(ZYME) is pulling ahead at 38. 9% versus -100. 0% for Adlai Nortye Ltd. (ANL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Adlai Nortye Ltd. grew EPS 68. 3% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ANL or ZYME or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -833. 1% for Adlai Nortye Ltd. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -996. 4% for ANL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANL leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ANL or ZYME or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or KO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Zymeworks Inc.

(ZYME) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANL: 151. 9% to $26. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ANL or ZYME or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. ANL, ZYME, IMVT, RCUS, KYMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ANL or ZYME or IMVT or RCUS or KYMR or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, RCUS: +40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ANL and ZYME and IMVT and RCUS and KYMR and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (ANL (Healthcare) and ZYME (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ANL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZYME is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while ANL, ZYME, IMVT, RCUS, KYMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.