Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ARCC vs OBDC vs KO vs GBDC vs TPVG vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Asset Management
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
ARCC vs OBDC vs KO vs GBDC vs TPVG vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Financial - Credit Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $12.95B | $5.40B | $341.71B | $3.22B | $203M | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.63B | $1.31B | $49.28B | $761M | $61M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.15B | $360M | $13.70B | $205M | $-12M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | 63.7% | 61.7% | 75.4% | 72.9% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 66.2% | 49.7% | 29.3% | 57.1% | -35.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 8.4x | 24.3x | 9.0x | 5.3x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $15.99B | $9.30B | $45.49B | $4.90B | $469M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $924M | $10M | $10.27B | $24M | $20M | $343.34B |
ARCC vs OBDC vs KO vs GBDC vs TPVG vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| Blue Owl Capital Co… (OBDC) | 100 | 88.2 | -11.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| Golub Capital BDC, … (GBDC) | 100 | 106.0 | +6.0% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ARCC vs OBDC vs KO vs GBDC vs TPVG vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ARCC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 43.7% margin vs TPVG's -19.5%
OBDC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 52.6% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.2%
GBDC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 11.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 5.35x
- PEG 0.29 vs TPVG's 5.28
- Beta 0.56, yield 11.2%, current ratio 5.35x
TPVG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- NIM 7.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Lower P/E (5.3x vs 14.6x)
- 20.5% yield, vs KO's 2.6%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs ARCC's 150.1%
- +20.9% vs OBDC's -15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 52.6% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.3x vs 14.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.7% margin vs TPVG's -19.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 20.5% yield, vs KO's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.9% vs OBDC's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.2% |
ARCC vs OBDC vs KO vs GBDC vs TPVG vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ARCC vs OBDC vs KO vs GBDC vs TPVG vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARCC leads in 1 of 6 categories
TPVG leads 1 • KO leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • OBDC leads 0 • GBDC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 4596.3x TPVG's $61M. ARCC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TPVG's -19.5%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $1.3B | $49.3B | $761M | $61M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $650M | $15.5B | $431M | -$22M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $360M | $13.7B | $205M | -$12M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $1.1B | $12.6B | $313M | -$59M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.8% | +63.7% | +61.7% | +75.4% | +72.9% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +66.2% | +49.7% | +29.3% | +57.1% | -35.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | +27.5% | +27.8% | +26.9% | -19.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +82.2% | +25.5% | +41.2% | -97.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.9% | -110.2% | +18.2% | -160.0% | -2.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.1x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 84% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBDC offers better value at 0.28x vs TPVG's 4.04x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.9B | $5.4B | $341.7B | $3.2B | $203M | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.0B | $14.7B | $376.9B | $8.1B | $652M | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.69x | 8.77x | 26.12x | 8.70x | 4.10x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.41x | 8.42x | 24.27x | 8.99x | 5.35x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | 1.99x | 2.34x | 0.28x | 4.04x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.79x | 11.85x | 25.45x | 11.77x | 8.61x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.12x | 3.22x | 7.13x | 3.69x | 2.09x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 0.74x | 9.99x | 0.82x | 0.57x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.34x | 3.10x | 64.52x | — | — | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. ARCC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs TPVG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +4.8% | +41.1% | +5.2% | -3.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +2.1% | +13.1% | +2.3% | -1.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +6.1% | +15.8% | +5.9% | +7.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +7.9% | +17.3% | +7.8% | +9.4% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.12x | 1.26x | 1.33x | 1.23x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.1B | $9.3B | $35.2B | $4.9B | $449M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $924M | $10M | $10.3B | $24M | $20M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.0B | $9.3B | $45.5B | $4.9B | $469M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.98x | 1.16x | 10.70x | 1.62x | -1.02x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,826 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +20.9% total return vs OBDC's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs TPVG's -8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.1% | -10.5% | +16.4% | -4.1% | -17.8% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.3% | -15.2% | +17.7% | -6.3% | -11.7% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.3% | +14.5% | +39.3% | +29.3% | -24.0% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | +29.2% | +65.3% | +30.5% | -21.7% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.1% | +37.6% | +115.0% | +52.8% | +80.0% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | +4.6% | +11.7% | +8.9% | -8.7% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs TPVG's 66.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.77x | -0.23x | 0.56x | 0.70x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.42 | $15.19 | $84.04 | $15.63 | $7.50 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.40 | $10.52 | $65.35 | $11.77 | $4.48 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +71.6% | +94.5% | +79.0% | +66.7% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.6 | 40.1 | 49.2 | 34.6 | 32.4 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.4M | 3.7M | 13.6M | 1.4M | 289K | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ARCC as "Buy", OBDC as "Buy", KO as "Buy", GBDC as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.0% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 20.50% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.00 | $13.00 | $86.13 | $14.25 | $8.95 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 13 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +13.7% | +2.6% | +11.2% | +20.5% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $1.49 | $2.04 | $1.38 | $1.02 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | +0.2% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
ARCC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TPVG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ARCC vs OBDC vs KO vs GBDC vs TPVG vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ARCC or OBDC or KO or GBDC or TPVG or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) is the stronger pick with 52.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 1x trailing P/E (5. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ARCC or OBDC or KO or GBDC or TPVG or JPM?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 1x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 5. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. wins at 0. 29x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 28x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ARCC or OBDC or KO or GBDC or TPVG or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -21. 7% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus OBDC's +37. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ARCC or OBDC or KO or GBDC or TPVG or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately -472% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 112% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ARCC or OBDC or KO or GBDC or TPVG or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blue Owl Capital Corporation (OBDC) is pulling ahead at 52.
6% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. grew EPS 48. 8% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ARCC or OBDC or KO or GBDC or TPVG or JPM?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 20. 4% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GBDC leads at 78. 9% versus 26. 0% for JPM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ARCC or OBDC or KO or GBDC or TPVG or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 5. 28x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) trades at 5. 3x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 18. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 79. 0% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — ARCC or OBDC or KO or GBDC or TPVG or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 20. 5%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is ARCC or OBDC or KO or GBDC or TPVG or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, OBDC: +37. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ARCC and OBDC and KO and GBDC and TPVG and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ARCC (Financial Services) and OBDC (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and GBDC (Financial Services) and TPVG (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; GBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.