Engineering & Construction
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BWMN vs CASS vs WEX vs HURN vs FLYW vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Software - Infrastructure
Consulting Services
Information Technology Services
Banks - Diversified
BWMN vs CASS vs WEX vs HURN vs FLYW vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Specialty Business Services | Software - Infrastructure | Consulting Services | Information Technology Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $532M | $638M | $4.70B | $1.77B | $1.76B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $377M | $204M | $2.70B | $1.74B | $188.60B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $35M | $310M | $104M | $12.54B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 46.6% | 88.6% | 57.4% | 23.3% | 0.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 19.0% | 24.7% | 11.3% | 5.7% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.9x | 16.5x | 7.0x | 12.4x | 32.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $147M | $5M | $4.86B | $548M | $0.00 | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $392M | $906M | $25M | $330M | $343.34B |
BWMN vs CASS vs WEX vs HURN vs FLYW vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bowman Consulting G… (BWMN) | 100 | 224.5 | +124.5% |
| Cass Information Sy… (CASS) | 100 | 108.4 | +8.4% |
| WEX Inc. (WEX) | 100 | 69.2 | -30.8% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 200.0 | +100.0% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 42.8 | -57.2% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 195.3 | +95.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWMN vs CASS vs WEX vs HURN vs FLYW vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWMN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.35 vs CASS's 1.92
- Lower P/E (17.9x vs 32.7x)
CASS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 2.5%
- Beta 0.65, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.10x
- 2.5% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
WEX doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
HURN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 0.43 vs BWMN's 1.81
- 6.8% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.0% vs 4.5%
FLYW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.6%, EPS growth 391.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 26.6% revenue growth vs CASS's -13.1%
- +36.3% vs HURN's -19.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BWMN's 121.9%
- 20.4% margin vs BWMN's 2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.6% revenue growth vs CASS's -13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.9x vs 32.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs BWMN's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs BWMN's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.3% vs HURN's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.0% vs 4.5% |
BWMN vs CASS vs WEX vs HURN vs FLYW vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BWMN vs CASS vs WEX vs HURN vs FLYW vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
HURN leads 1 • CASS leads 1 • BWMN leads 0 • WEX leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1377.4x CASS's $204M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWMN's 2.8%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $377M | $204M | $2.7B | $1.7B | $188.6B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $44M | $952M | $231M | $10.8B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $35M | $310M | $104M | $12.5B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | $32M | $460M | $124M | -$15.8B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +88.6% | +57.4% | +23.3% | +0.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +19.0% | +24.7% | +11.3% | +5.7% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +17.3% | +11.5% | +6.0% | +6.6% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +15.6% | +17.0% | +7.1% | -8.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -10.1% | +5.8% | +14.2% | +1408.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +87.9% | +22.7% | +0.8% | +4.0% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BWMN and JPM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 88% valuation discount to FLYW's 133.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWMN offers better value at 0.84x vs CASS's 2.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $532M | $638M | $4.7B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $668M | $251M | $8.6B | $2.3B | $1.4B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.56x | 18.95x | 16.00x | 18.74x | 133.73x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.88x | 16.48x | 6.98x | 12.39x | 32.74x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.84x | 2.21x | — | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.37x | 6.46x | 8.59x | 9.92x | 38.15x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 3.34x | 1.77x | 1.04x | 2.82x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.99x | 2.74x | 3.94x | 3.72x | 2.25x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.91x | 20.09x | 14.97x | 9.70x | 17.76x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HURN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WEX delivers a 27.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $4 for BWMN. CASS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEX's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASS scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.1% | +14.6% | +27.0% | +21.8% | +5.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +1.4% | +2.1% | +6.8% | +4.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | — | +9.6% | +15.0% | +2.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +18.6% | +1.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.02x | 3.94x | 1.04x | — | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $136M | -$388M | $4.0B | $524M | -$330M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $392M | $906M | $25M | $330M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $147M | $5M | $4.9B | $548M | $0 | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.38x | — | 2.76x | 7.70x | 1.84x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWMN five years ago would be worth $22,846 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,727 for FLYW. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +36.3% total return vs HURN's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FLYW's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.3% | +23.4% | -8.7% | -36.0% | +5.8% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.4% | +18.6% | -3.2% | -19.9% | +36.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.2% | +31.4% | -22.7% | +30.6% | -54.3% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.5% | +20.7% | -32.9% | +112.8% | -52.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.9% | +56.1% | +50.6% | +86.9% | -58.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.4% | +9.5% | -8.2% | +9.3% | -23.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HURN and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HURN is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWMN's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs HURN's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 0.65x | 0.86x | 0.43x | 1.57x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.83 | $52.45 | $186.85 | $186.78 | $18.05 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.00 | $36.07 | $132.34 | $100.10 | $10.11 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.8% | +94.3% | +72.5% | +58.6% | +81.5% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 67.2 | 36.9 | 41.2 | 47.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 105K | 80K | 542K | 227K | 2.1M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
CASS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BWMN as "Buy", CASS as "Buy", WEX as "Hold", HURN as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 86.7% upside for BWMN (target: $58) vs 3.1% for CASS (target: $51). For income investors, CASS offers the higher dividend yield at 2.48% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.00 | $51.00 | $175.14 | $157.50 | $18.67 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 2 | 32 | 9 | 19 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.5% | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 24 | 2 | 1 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.23 | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | +4.1% | +17.0% | +9.4% | +4.5% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HURN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BWMN vs CASS vs WEX vs HURN vs FLYW vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWMN or CASS or WEX or HURN or FLYW or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger pick with 26.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWMN or CASS or WEX or HURN or FLYW or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Flywire Corporation at 133. 7x. On forward P/E, WEX Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. wins at 0. 35x versus Cass Information Systems, Inc. 's 1. 92x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWMN or CASS or WEX or HURN or FLYW or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
(BWMN) delivered a total return of +128. 5%, compared to -52. 7% for Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FLYW's -58. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWMN or CASS or WEX or HURN or FLYW or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. 's 1. 81β — meaning BWMN is approximately 322% more volatile than HURN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 4% for WEX Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWMN or CASS or WEX or HURN or FLYW or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is pulling ahead at 26.
6% versus -13. 1% for Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -6. 9% for Huron Consulting Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLYW leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWMN or CASS or WEX or HURN or FLYW or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 2. 2% for Flywire Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 1. 8% for FLYW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CASS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWMN or CASS or WEX or HURN or FLYW or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Cass Information Systems, Inc. 's 1. 92x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, WEX Inc. (WEX) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 32. 7x for Flywire Corporation — 25. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BWMN: 86. 7% to $58. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWMN or CASS or WEX or HURN or FLYW or JPM?
In this comparison, CASS (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. BWMN, WEX, HURN, FLYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BWMN or CASS or WEX or HURN or FLYW or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, BWMN: +121. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWMN and CASS and WEX and HURN and FLYW and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (BWMN (Industrials) and CASS (Industrials) and WEX (Technology) and HURN (Industrials) and FLYW (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BWMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CASS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. CASS, JPM pay a dividend while BWMN, WEX, HURN, FLYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.