Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Banks - Diversified
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Software - Application | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $43M | $16K | $505M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $12M | $335M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-740K | $-156M | $107M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 15.2% | 63.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | -7.2% | 42.6% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 79.1x | 0.0x | 10.9x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $2M | $152M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $273K | $6M | $199M | $343.34B |
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| byNordic Acquisitio… (BYNO) | 100 | 126.9 | +26.9% |
| Next Technology Hol… (NXTT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 941.4 | +841.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 259.5 | +159.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYNO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NXTT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 7.3%
- 5.5% revenue growth vs BYNO's -79.9%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 14.4x)
ACIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.10
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 0.10, current ratio 1.22x
- 31.9% margin vs NXTT's -12.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BYNO's 27.8%
- 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +21.8% vs NXTT's -99.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs BYNO's -79.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 14.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs NXTT's -12.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs NXTT's 1.74 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs NXTT's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs NXTT's -26.2%, ROIC 41.0% vs -22.5% |
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACIC leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 2 • NXTT leads 1 • BYNO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 207142.8x BYNO's $1M. ACIC is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXTT's -12.9%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $12M | $335M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$86M | $154M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$739,762 | -$156M | $107M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $145M | $71M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +15.2% | +63.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | -7.2% | +42.6% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -54.7% | -12.9% | +31.9% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +12.0% | +21.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +9.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.2% | -3.1% | +4.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NXTT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, NXTT trades at a 100% valuation discount to BYNO's 79.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACIC's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $16,069 | $505M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | -$4M | $459M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.06x | 0.00x | 4.86x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 10.94x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.00x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2.81x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.00x | 1.51x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.00x | 1.64x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.13x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NXTT. NXTT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NXTT scores 6/9 vs BYNO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | -30.0% | +35.7% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | -26.2% | +9.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -22.5% | +41.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -26.3% | +26.0% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | 0.48x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$4M | -$46M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272,588 | $6M | $199M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $2M | $152M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 14.20x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for NXTT. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs NXTT's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs NXTT's -89.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | -73.5% | -1.6% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.0% | -99.3% | +5.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | -99.9% | +137.8% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -100.0% | +98.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -100.0% | -24.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | -89.5% | +33.5% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BYNO and ACIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NXTT's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYNO currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs NXTT's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 1.74x | 0.10x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.75 | $738.00 | $13.06 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.01 | $0.45 | $9.79 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +0.2% | +80.0% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 51.3 | 44.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 414 | 145K | 238K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACIC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -81.8% for ACIC (target: $2). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $1.90 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 5 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +69.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
ACIC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
BYNO vs NXTT vs ACIC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the stronger pick with 545. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus byNordic Acquisition Corporation at 79. 1x. On forward P/E, American Coastal Insurance Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus NXTT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus Next Technology Holding Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning NXTT is approximately 1572% more volatile than ACIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is pulling ahead at 545. 3% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Next Technology Holding Inc. grew EPS 728. 0% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for byNordic Acquisition Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or JPM?
Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the more profitable company, earning 1233% net margin versus -54. 7% for byNordic Acquisition Corporation — meaning it keeps 1233% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACIC leads at 42. 6% versus -690. 5% for NXTT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) trades at 10.
9x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. BYNO, NXTT, ACIC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BYNO or NXTT or ACIC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, NXTT: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BYNO and NXTT and ACIC and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (BYNO (Financial Services) and NXTT (Technology) and ACIC (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BYNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXTT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while BYNO, NXTT, ACIC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.