Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $808M | $1.65B | $2.52B | $2.70B | $355.61B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $676M | $902M | $1.16B | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $62M | $80M | $169M | $224M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 49.9% | 73.6% | 64.7% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.0% | 16.7% | 24.3% | 24.2% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 10.0x | 11.5x | 11.8x | 25.3x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $93M | $1.17B | $327M | $1.12B | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $92M | $185M | $668M | $10.27B | $343.34B |
CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital City Bank G… (CCBG) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| ConnectOne Bancorp,… (CNOB) | 100 | 203.3 | +103.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 187.2 | +87.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCBG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 16.9%, current ratio 1.24x
- NIM 3.9% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Beta 0.56 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage
CNOB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 25.3x)
- +45.1% vs KO's +17.2%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs CNOB's 11.9%
- 13.1% ROA vs CNOB's 0.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.5%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs CCBG's 257.8%
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CNOB's 11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs CNOB's 1.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CNOB's 0.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 3.5% |
CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CCBG leads in 1 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • CNOB leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • TRMK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCBG leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1003.7x CCBG's $279M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNOB's 11.9%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $676M | $902M | $1.2B | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $89M | $122M | $241M | $323M | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $62M | $80M | $169M | $224M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $98M | $102M | $225M | $230M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.1% | +49.9% | +73.6% | +64.7% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +16.7% | +24.3% | +24.2% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +11.9% | +18.8% | +19.3% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +15.1% | +24.9% | +19.8% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.8% | +53.1% | +39.5% | +5.4% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CNOB and TRMK and JPM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 54% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $808M | $1.6B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $355.6B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $839M | $2.7B | $2.7B | $3.2B | $390.8B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.09x | 22.14x | 14.47x | 12.41x | 27.18x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.04x | 10.04x | 11.54x | 11.75x | 25.27x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | — | 2.06x | 1.54x | 2.43x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.39x | 24.17x | 11.03x | 9.67x | 26.39x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 2.72x | 2.90x | 2.41x | 7.42x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | 1.05x | 1.29x | 1.31x | 10.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.10x | 16.31x | 11.49x | 11.65x | 67.15x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNOB. CCBG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCBG scores 7/9 vs CNOB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.5% | +5.5% | +9.5% | +10.8% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +3.5% | +7.9% | +7.1% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +1.5% | +2.4% | +3.2% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.74x | 0.17x | 0.53x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $1.1B | $142M | $448M | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $92M | $185M | $668M | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $1.2B | $327M | $1.1B | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.56x | 0.39x | 1.05x | 0.75x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,276 for CNOB. Over the past 12 months, CNOB leads with a +45.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +26.9% | +17.6% | +18.7% | +20.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.9% | +45.1% | +18.3% | +35.5% | +17.2% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.7% | +114.8% | +48.5% | +115.6% | +47.0% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.7% | +32.8% | +44.4% | +56.8% | +65.6% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +257.8% | +139.7% | +108.5% | +127.3% | +121.1% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +29.0% | +14.1% | +29.2% | +13.7% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNOB's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 1.02x | 0.76x | 0.82x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.78 | $32.87 | $48.27 | $46.03 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.94 | $21.79 | $39.20 | $33.39 | $65.35 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +99.7% | +99.8% | +99.7% | +98.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 69.9 | 63.1 | 60.1 | 60.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 77K | 328K | 266K | 330K | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCBG as "Hold", CNOB as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.50 | $34.00 | $46.00 | $45.50 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +1.9% | +3.0% | +2.1% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 7 | 13 | 1 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $0.63 | $1.43 | $0.97 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
CCBG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CCBG vs CNOB vs NBTB vs TRMK vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
4x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +32. 8% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning CNOB is approximately -610% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -15. 9% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or KO or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 13. 3% for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCBG leads at 30. 0% versus 18. 6% for CNOB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCBG leads at 87. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or KO or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 9% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is CCBG or CNOB or NBTB or TRMK or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, CNOB: +139. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCBG and CNOB and NBTB and TRMK and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCBG (Financial Services) and CNOB (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and TRMK (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CCBG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNOB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.