Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CCIX logo
CCIX
BFLY logo
BFLY
GS logo
GS
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CCIX vs BFLY vs GS vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CCIX
Churchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares

Financial Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$396M
5Y Perf.+7.9%
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.45B
5Y Perf.+558.9%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$337.53B
5Y Perf.+135.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+58.6%

CCIX vs BFLY vs GS vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CCIX logoCCIX
BFLY logoBFLY
GS logoGS
JPM logoJPM
IndustryFinancial ServicesMedical - DevicesFinancial - Capital MarketsBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$396M$1.45B$337.53B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$103M$125.10B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$-76M$17.18B$57.05B
Gross Margin49.2%47.5%60.0%
Operating Margin-79.5%17.5%25.9%
Forward P/E47.0x17.9x14.4x
Total Debt$0.00$20M$609.53B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$2K$150M$164.26B$343.34B

CCIX vs BFLY vs GS vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CCIX
BFLY
GS
JPM
StockJun 24Jun 26Return
Churchill Capital C… (CCIX)100107.9+7.9%
Butterfly Network, … (BFLY)100658.9+558.9%
The Goldman Sachs G… (GS)100235.0+135.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100158.6+58.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CCIX vs BFLY vs GS vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Churchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. BFLY also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CCIX
Churchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares
The Banking Pick

CCIX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and bank quality is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.93x
  • NIM 4.1% vs GS's 0.7%
  • Beta 0.04 vs BFLY's 3.21
  • 2.4% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC -1.0% vs -76.8%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.
The Growth Play

BFLY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
  • 19.0% revenue growth vs CCIX's -3.8%
  • +127.0% vs CCIX's +1.9%
Best for: growth exposure
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 6.7% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • PEG 0.81 vs GS's 1.14
  • Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 17.9x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.14
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBFLY logoBFLY19.0% revenue growth vs CCIX's -3.8%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 17.9x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.14
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
Stability / SafetyCCIX logoCCIXBeta 0.04 vs BFLY's 3.21
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs GS's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BFLY logoBFLY+127.0% vs CCIX's +1.9%
Efficiency (ROA)CCIX logoCCIX2.4% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC -1.0% vs -76.8%

CCIX vs BFLY vs GS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CCIXChurchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

BFLYButterfly Network, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
65.0%$63M
Software And Other Services
35.0%$34M
GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Global Markets
71.1%$41.5B
Investment Management
28.6%$16.7B
Platform Solutions
0.3%$151M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

CCIX vs BFLY vs GS vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGBFLY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and CCIX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%.

MetricCCIX logoCCIXChurchill Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$103M$125.1B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M-$76M$24.0B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7M-$76M$17.2B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$19M-$47.2B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.2%+47.5%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-79.5%+17.5%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-73.6%+13.7%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-18.3%-37.7%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-44.9%+16.0%+45.8%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 66% valuation discount to CCIX's 47.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs GS's 1.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCCIX logoCCIXChurchill Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$396M$1.4B$337.5B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$396M$1.3B$782.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS47.00x-17.87x20.71x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.93x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.32x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple32.57x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue14.85x2.70x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.04x6.99x2.70x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. BFLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GS's 4.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GS scores 5/9 vs CCIX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCCIX logoCCIXChurchill Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.5%-36.8%+13.6%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.4%-25.6%+1.0%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.0%-76.8%+2.2%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.3%-39.3%+4.0%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92355
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x4.88x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2,469-$130M$445.3B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2,469$150M$164.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$20M$609.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-71.59x0.33x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $30,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,994 for BFLY. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +127.0% total return vs CCIX's +1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 48.1% vs CCIX's 2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCCIX logoCCIXChurchill Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.9%+47.7%+17.2%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+1.9%+127.0%+72.7%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+7.8%+150.7%+224.8%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+7.8%-60.1%+200.5%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+7.8%-44.0%+666.8%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.5%+35.8%+48.1%+33.6%
GS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CCIX and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CCIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GS currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs BFLY's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCCIX logoCCIXChurchill Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.04x3.21x1.60x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.32$5.97$1095.89$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.45$1.32$609.59$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.5%+92.8%+97.0%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.665.857.359.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded158K4.9M1.9M7.0M
Evenly matched — CCIX and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BFLY as "Buy", GS as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -8.5% for GS (target: $973). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs GS's 1.56%.

MetricCCIX logoCCIXChurchill Capital…BFLY logoBFLYButterfly Network…GS logoGSThe Goldman Sachs…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.42$972.70$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts75561
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1415
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$16.62$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.7%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CCIX vs BFLY vs GS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CCIX or BFLY or GS or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.

(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CCIX or BFLY or GS or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Churchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares at 47. 0x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CCIX or BFLY or GS or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(GS) delivered a total return of +200. 5%, compared to -60. 1% for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +666. 8% versus BFLY's -44. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CCIX or BFLY or GS or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Churchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares (CCIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

04β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning BFLY is approximately 8170% more volatile than CCIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CCIX or BFLY or GS or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.

(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -1. 4% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. grew EPS 26. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 3% for Churchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CCIX or BFLY or GS or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CCIX or BFLY or GS or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 9x for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CCIX or BFLY or GS or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield), GS (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CCIX, BFLY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CCIX or BFLY or GS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, BFLY: -44. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CCIX and BFLY and GS and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (CCIX (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare) and GS (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CCIX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; GS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. GS, JPM pay a dividend while CCIX, BFLY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.