Financial Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CCIX vs C vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
CCIX vs C vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial Services | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $396M | $260.45B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $168.30B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $14.27B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.6% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.8% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 47.0x | 12.9x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $715.80B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2K | $349.58B | $10.27B |
CCIX vs C vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Churchill Capital C… (CCIX) | 100 | 107.9 | +7.9% |
| Citigroup Inc. (C) | 100 | 220.3 | +120.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CCIX vs C vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CCIX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.93x
- NIM 4.1% vs C's 2.3%
- Beta 0.04 vs C's 1.44
C is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 267.2% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- PEG 1.58 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (12.9x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.58 vs 2.26
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- Beta -0.20, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.46x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.9% revenue growth vs CCIX's -3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.58 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CCIX's 4.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs C's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs C's 2.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.8% vs CCIX's +1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs C's 0.5%, ROIC 15.8% vs 1.7% |
CCIX vs C vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CCIX vs C vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
C and CCIX operate at a comparable scale, with $168.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to C's 8.5%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $168.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $23.1B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $14.3B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$97.0B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +44.6% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +11.8% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +8.5% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -57.7% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.9% | +23.2% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
C leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.0x trailing earnings, C trades at a 57% valuation discount to CCIX's 47.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.43x vs C's 2.46x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $396M | $260.4B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $396M | $626.7B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.00x | 20.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.86x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.46x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.13x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.55x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 1.22x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.69x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $2 for CCIX. KO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to C's 3.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), C scores 7/9 vs CCIX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +6.7% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +0.5% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +1.7% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +2.3% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.35x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2,469 | $366.2B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2,469 | $349.6B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $715.8B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.24x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
C leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in C five years ago would be worth $20,047 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,778 for CCIX. Over the past 12 months, C leads with a +81.8% total return vs CCIX's +1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors C at 44.6% vs CCIX's 2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +18.8% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.9% | +81.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.8% | +202.6% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.8% | +100.5% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.8% | +267.2% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.5% | +44.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — C and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than C's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. C currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs CCIX's 95.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 1.44x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.32 | $141.12 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.45 | $76.11 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +99.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 67.5 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 158K | 8.6M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: C as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for KO (target: $86) vs 0.5% for C (target: $141). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs C's 2.06%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $140.50 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.88 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). C leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CCIX vs C vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CCIX or C or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger pick with 1.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Citigroup Inc. (C). Citigroup Inc. (C) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citigroup Inc. (C) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CCIX or C or KO?
On trailing P/E, Citigroup Inc.
(C) is the cheapest at 20. 0x versus Churchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares at 47. 0x. On forward P/E, Citigroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Citigroup Inc. wins at 1. 58x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CCIX or C or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Citigroup Inc.
(C) delivered a total return of +100. 5%, compared to +7. 8% for Churchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares (CCIX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: C returned +267. 2% versus CCIX's +7. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CCIX or C or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Citigroup Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning C is approximately -818% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 3% for Citigroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CCIX or C or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is pulling ahead at 1.
9% versus -1. 4% for Citigroup Inc. (C). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 3% for Churchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CCIX or C or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Churchill Capital Corp IX Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 0. 0% for CCIX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CCIX or C or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Citigroup Inc. (C) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 58x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Citigroup Inc. (C) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 4. 2% to $86. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — CCIX or C or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), C (2. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CCIX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CCIX or C or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, C: +267. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CCIX and C and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (CCIX (Financial Services) and C (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
C, KO pay a dividend while CCIX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.