Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CMBT logo
CMBT
TEN logo
TEN
STNG logo
STNG
TNK logo
TNK
INSW logo
INSW
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CMBT vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs INSW vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BE
Market Cap$3.54B
5Y Perf.+89.3%
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • GR
Market Cap$1.17B
5Y Perf.+287.1%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.+514.8%
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.62B
5Y Perf.+489.4%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.03B
5Y Perf.+398.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$348.25B
5Y Perf.+81.1%

CMBT vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs INSW vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CMBT logoCMBT
TEN logoTEN
STNG logoSTNG
TNK logoTNK
INSW logoINSW
KO logoKO
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas MidstreamMarine ShippingOil & Gas MidstreamBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$3.54B$1.17B$4.08B$2.62B$4.03B$348.25B
Revenue (TTM)$1.67B$801M$1.04B$1.01B$985M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$161M$142M$502M$429M$546M$13.70B
Gross Margin35.5%35.0%51.8%34.9%55.1%61.7%
Operating Margin27.4%29.3%38.8%31.0%50.4%29.3%
Forward P/E7.6x5.3x6.2x5.1x5.7x24.7x
Total Debt$5.57B$1.93B$619M$55M$576M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$147M$303M$752M$831M$117M$10.27B

CMBT vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs INSW vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CMBT
TEN
STNG
TNK
INSW
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Cmb.Tech N.V. (CMBT)100189.3+89.3%
Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN)100387.1+287.1%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100614.8+514.8%
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)100589.4+489.4%
International Seawa… (INSW)100498.2+398.2%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100181.1+81.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CMBT vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs INSW vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INSW leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Cmb.Tech N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. TEN, STNG, and TNK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇INSW emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.
The Growth Leader

CMBT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
Best for: growth
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
The Income Pick

TEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 5.2%
  • 5.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: income & stability
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Defensive Pick

STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Beta 0.12, yield 2.1%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Beta 0.12 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Value Pick

TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.16 vs KO's 2.21
  • Lower P/E (5.1x vs 24.7x), PEG 0.16 vs 2.21
Best for: valuation efficiency
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 9.7% 10Y total return vs TNK's 235.9%
  • 55.4% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
  • +131.0% vs KO's +17.7%
  • 20.1% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs 4.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Growth Play

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCMBT logoCMBT77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueTNK logoTNKLower P/E (5.1x vs 24.7x), PEG 0.16 vs 2.21
Quality / MarginsINSW logoINSW55.4% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
Stability / SafetySTNG logoSTNGBeta 0.12 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage
DividendsTEN logoTEN5.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)INSW logoINSW+131.0% vs KO's +17.7%
Efficiency (ROA)INSW logoINSW20.1% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs 4.7%

CMBT vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs INSW vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CMBTCmb.Tech N.V.
FY 2025
Spot Voyages
84.7%$822M
Pool Revenue
15.3%$148M
TENTsakos Energy Navigation Limited
FY 2021
Clean Air Division
67.7%$8.1B
Ride Performance Division
24.2%$2.9B
Powertrain
6.3%$755M
Motorparts
1.9%$223M
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
FY 2025
Voyage charters
56.3%$785M
Voyage Charters - Suezmax
30.5%$425M
Other revenue
10.3%$143M
Time-charter
1.7%$23M
Ship-to-ship support services, Other revenue
1.1%$15M
Time Charters - Suezmax
0.3%$4M
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.
FY 2025
Pool Revenue Leases
76.1%$642M
Time and Bareboat Charter Leases
18.7%$158M
Voyage Charter Leases
5.2%$44M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

CMBT vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs INSW vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGSTNG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 61.5x TEN's $801M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 55.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBT's 9.6%. On growth, CMBT holds the edge at +160.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.7B$801M$1.0B$1.0B$985M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$856M$365M$580M$398M$661M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$161M$142M$502M$429M$546M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$612M-$562M$389M$138M$122M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.5%+35.0%+51.8%+34.9%+55.1%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.4%+29.3%+38.8%+31.0%+50.4%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.6%+17.7%+48.4%+42.6%+55.4%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-36.7%-70.2%+37.5%+13.7%+12.3%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+160.6%+18.0%+46.2%+23.5%+77.5%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.4%+3.1%+2.5%+100.9%+4.8%+18.2%
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 7.5x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 72% valuation discount to KO's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.24x vs KO's 2.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$3.5B$1.2B$4.1B$2.6B$4.0B$348.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.0B$2.8B$3.9B$1.8B$4.5B$383.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.14x8.74x11.20x7.48x13.07x26.62x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.63x5.26x6.22x5.13x5.65x24.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.34x0.24x2.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.82x6.83x8.05x6.11x9.55x25.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.13x1.47x4.34x2.75x4.78x7.26x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.35x0.62x1.21x1.29x2.00x10.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.30x23.24x105.69x65.76x
TNK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — TNK and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMBT. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMBT's 2.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.2%+7.8%+15.9%+21.4%+27.1%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.9%+3.7%+12.6%+19.5%+20.1%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.7%+5.4%+7.2%+12.5%+9.4%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+7.1%+8.4%+10.9%+12.1%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9446467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.12x1.04x0.19x0.03x0.29x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.4B$1.6B-$133M-$776M$459M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$147M$303M$752M$831M$117M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.6B$1.9B$619M$55M$576M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.09x2.45x6.82x140.54x1.41x10.70x
Evenly matched — TNK and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $56,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,313 for KO. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +131.0% total return vs KO's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 37.9% vs KO's 12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+73.6%+80.0%+60.3%+49.6%+87.5%+18.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+74.9%+114.4%+94.2%+69.0%+131.0%+17.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+43.6%+131.1%+83.5%+115.3%+162.1%+42.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+168.6%+396.0%+296.4%+464.8%+426.7%+63.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+208.2%+76.6%+84.7%+235.9%+971.9%+118.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.8%+32.2%+22.4%+29.1%+37.9%+12.6%
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMBT's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs TEN's 84.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.42x0.26x0.12x0.31x0.31x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.72$45.85$87.39$83.99$92.66$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.78$18.63$38.83$41.05$36.03$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.1%+84.8%+90.1%+90.0%+87.9%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.047.854.353.951.960.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M309K896K397K498K12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TEN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CMBT as "Hold", TEN as "Buy", STNG as "Buy", TNK as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.5% upside for TEN (target: $50) vs 6.5% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, TEN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.20% vs CMBT's 0.59%.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$50.00$87.00$86.00$86.67$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts32631231348
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+5.2%+2.1%+2.6%+3.6%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0430156
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.09$2.02$1.69$1.98$2.92$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — TEN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TNK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CMBT vs TEN vs STNG vs TNK vs INSW vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CMBT or TEN or STNG or TNK or INSW or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (5. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CMBT or TEN or STNG or TNK or INSW or KO?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 16x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CMBT or TEN or STNG or TNK or INSW or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) delivered a total return of +464. 8%, compared to +63. 1% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +971. 9% versus TEN's +76. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CMBT or TEN or STNG or TNK or INSW or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Cmb. Tech N. V. 's 0. 42β — meaning CMBT is approximately -310% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CMBT or TEN or STNG or TNK or INSW or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBT leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CMBT or TEN or STNG or TNK or INSW or KO?

Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 9. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 22. 2% for CMBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CMBT or TEN or STNG or TNK or INSW or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 7x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEN: 28. 5% to $50. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CMBT or TEN or STNG or TNK or INSW or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 0. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT).

09

Is CMBT or TEN or STNG or TNK or INSW or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31), 3. 6% yield, +971. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +971. 9%, CMBT: +208. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CMBT and TEN and STNG and TNK and INSW and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (CMBT (Industrials) and TEN (Energy) and STNG (Energy) and TNK (Industrials) and INSW (Energy) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CMBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.