Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CNTA logo
CNTA
VERA logo
VERA
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CNTA vs VERA vs KO vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CNTA
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$6.15B
5Y Perf.+82.6%
VERA
Vera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.46B
5Y Perf.+98.6%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+49.4%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+95.3%

CNTA vs VERA vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CNTA logoCNTA
VERA logoVERA
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$6.15B$2.46B$355.61B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$49.28B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-251M$-369M$13.70B$57.05B
Gross Margin100.0%61.7%60.0%
Operating Margin-13.8%29.3%25.9%
Forward P/E25.3x14.4x
Total Debt$8M$77M$45.49B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$61M$355M$10.27B$343.34B

CNTA vs VERA vs KO vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CNTA
VERA
KO
JPM
StockMay 21Jun 26Return
Centessa Pharmaceut… (CNTA)100182.6+82.6%
Vera Therapeutics, … (VERA)100198.6+98.6%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100149.4+49.4%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100195.3+95.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CNTA vs VERA vs KO vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CNTA and VERA also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CNTA
Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc
The Defensive Pick

CNTA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 8.57x
  • +229.9% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
VERA
Vera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Leader

VERA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 35.4% revenue growth vs CNTA's -100.0%
Best for: growth
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • 27.8% margin vs CNTA's -13.2%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 13.1% ROA vs VERA's -60.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -54.6%
Best for: income & stability
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs VERA's 197.9%
  • PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
  • Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVERA logoVERA35.4% revenue growth vs CNTA's -100.0%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs CNTA's -13.2%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs VERA's 1.42
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CNTA logoCNTA+229.9% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs VERA's -60.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -54.6%

CNTA vs VERA vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CNTACentessa Pharmaceuticals plc
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$15M
VERAVera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

CNTA vs VERA vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGVERA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and VERA operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNTA's -13.2%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$49.3B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$257M-$383M$15.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$251M-$369M$13.7B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$209M-$187M$12.6B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+61.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.8%+29.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.2%+27.8%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.9%+25.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-160.0%-108.6%+18.2%+16.0%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 41% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$6.1B$2.5B$355.6B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.1B$2.2B$390.8B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-27.21x-7.35x27.18x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.27x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.39x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue409.72x7.42x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share10.23x3.64x10.40x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-75 for VERA. CNTA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs VERA's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-60.4%-74.9%+41.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-44.2%-60.2%+13.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-51.2%-54.6%+15.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-35.7%-48.1%+17.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95175
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.13x1.33x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$54M-$277M$35.2B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$61M$355M$10.3B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$77M$45.5B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-23.48x-31.22x10.70x0.74x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CNTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VERA five years ago would be worth $22,204 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,888 for CNTA. Over the past 12 months, CNTA leads with a +229.9% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNTA at 104.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+67.7%-29.5%+20.3%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+229.9%+52.1%+17.2%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+756.0%+280.7%+47.0%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+58.9%+122.0%+65.6%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.6%+197.9%+121.1%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+104.6%+56.1%+13.7%+33.6%
CNTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CNTA and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VERA's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNTA currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs VERA's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x1.42x-0.20x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$40.25$56.05$84.04$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.77$19.07$65.35$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.7%+61.1%+98.3%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.146.960.659.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M1.1M12.7M7.0M
Evenly matched — CNTA and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CNTA as "Buy", VERA as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.5% upside for VERA (target: $80) vs -0.6% for CNTA (target: $40). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricCNTA logoCNTACentessa Pharmace…VERA logoVERAVera Therapeutics…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.50$80.33$86.13$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts14144861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%+3.9%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CNTA vs VERA vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CNTA or VERA or KO or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc (CNTA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CNTA or VERA or KO or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CNTA or VERA or KO or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Vera Therapeutics, Inc.

(VERA) delivered a total return of +122. 0%, compared to +58. 9% for Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc (CNTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CNTA's +82. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CNTA or VERA or KO or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Vera Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning VERA is approximately -809% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc (CNTA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CNTA or VERA or KO or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc grew EPS 29. 1% year-over-year, compared to -69. 5% for Vera Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CNTA or VERA or KO or JPM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -1316. 9% for Centessa Pharmaceuticals plc — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1384. 6% for CNTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNTA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CNTA or VERA or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VERA: 134. 5% to $80. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CNTA or VERA or KO or JPM?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. CNTA, VERA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CNTA or VERA or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, VERA: +197. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CNTA and VERA and KO and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (CNTA (Healthcare) and VERA (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CNTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VERA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KO, JPM pay a dividend while CNTA, VERA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.