Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
DNTH logo
DNTH
IMVT logo
IMVT
ALXO logo
ALXO
RCUS logo
RCUS
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DNTH vs IMVT vs ALXO vs RCUS vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DNTH
Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.19B
5Y Perf.-31.9%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.75B
5Y Perf.+45.4%
ALXO
ALX Oncology Holdings Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$82M
5Y Perf.-95.4%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.35B
5Y Perf.+18.4%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$875.80B
5Y Perf.+224.4%

DNTH vs IMVT vs ALXO vs RCUS vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DNTH logoDNTH
IMVT logoIMVT
ALXO logoALXO
RCUS logoRCUS
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$3.19B$6.75B$82M$2.35B$875.80B
Revenue (TTM)$1M$0.00$0.00$236M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-11M$-506M$-89M$-369M$57.05B
Gross Margin94.3%90.7%60.0%
Operating Margin-143.2%-168.6%25.9%
Forward P/E14.1x
Total Debt$1M$72K$5M$99M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$51M$902M$16M$222M$343.34B

DNTH vs IMVT vs ALXO vs RCUS vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DNTH
IMVT
ALXO
RCUS
JPM
StockJul 20Jun 26Return
Dianthus Therapeuti… (DNTH)10068.1-31.9%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100145.4+45.4%
ALX Oncology Holdin… (ALXO)1004.6-95.4%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)100118.4+18.4%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100324.4+224.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DNTH vs IMVT vs ALXO vs RCUS vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. ALXO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
DNTH
Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

DNTH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 13.32x
  • Beta 1.29, current ratio 13.32x
  • +321.9% vs JPM's +19.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ALXO
ALX Oncology Holdings Inc.
The Growth Leader

ALXO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 31.7% revenue growth vs DNTH's -67.3%
Best for: growth
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 454.4% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 230.5%
  • 20.4% margin vs DNTH's -8.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthALXO logoALXO31.7% revenue growth vs DNTH's -67.3%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs DNTH's -8.5%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.95 vs RCUS's 1.98
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DNTH logoDNTH+321.9% vs JPM's +19.1%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs ALXO's -85.6%, ROIC 4.5% vs -122.0%

DNTH vs IMVT vs ALXO vs RCUS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DNTHDianthus Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
License
100.0%$2M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ALXOALX Oncology Holdings Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

DNTH vs IMVT vs ALXO vs RCUS vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and ALXO operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DNTH's -8.5%. On growth, RCUS holds the edge at -39.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDNTH logoDNTHDianthus Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALXO logoALXOALX Oncology Hold…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$0$0$236M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$191M-$532M-$91M-$391M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$11M-$506M-$89M-$369M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$130M-$407M-$78M-$489M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+94.3%+90.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-143.2%-168.6%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.5%-156.4%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-97.7%-2.1%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.2%-39.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.7%-14.1%+43.1%+10.5%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricDNTH logoDNTHDianthus Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALXO logoALXOALX Oncology Hold…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$3.2B$6.8B$82M$2.3B$875.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.1B$5.8B$71M$2.2B$1.47T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-18.20x-11.87x-0.80x-7.08x15.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.08x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1567.68x9.50x3.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.86x7.04x3.14x3.97x2.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.68x
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-124 for ALXO. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricDNTH logoDNTHDianthus Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALXO logoALXOALX Oncology Hold…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-1.8%-68.2%-124.1%-69.0%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.7%-62.2%-85.6%-35.3%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-34.4%-122.0%-64.1%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-41.6%-68.3%-127.0%-42.1%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–922205
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.00x0.20x0.16x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$50M-$902M-$11M-$123M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$51M$902M$16M$222M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$72,000$5M$99M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-58.09x-13.38x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

DNTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $255 for ALXO. Over the past 12 months, DNTH leads with a +321.9% total return vs JPM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DNTH at 89.0% vs ALXO's -44.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDNTH logoDNTHDianthus Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALXO logoALXOALX Oncology Hold…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+92.7%+26.9%+32.2%+0.0%-2.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+321.9%+103.6%+177.1%+156.6%+19.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+574.8%+51.6%-82.6%+15.9%+133.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-58.7%+207.0%-97.5%-6.4%+110.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.1%+230.5%-94.9%+37.1%+454.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+89.0%+14.9%-44.2%+5.0%+32.6%
DNTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs ALXO's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDNTH logoDNTHDianthus Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALXO logoALXOALX Oncology Hold…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.29x1.67x1.49x1.98x0.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$96.50$36.27$2.66$28.72$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$16.64$14.32$0.40$7.91$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+79.2%+90.6%+57.1%+81.1%+93.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.851.927.939.354.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded674K1.9M1.1M1.1M7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: DNTH as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ALXO as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 163.2% upside for ALXO (target: $4) vs 8.1% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricDNTH logoDNTHDianthus Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALXO logoALXOALX Oncology Hold…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$111.91$43.67$4.00$31.17$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts102371861
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DNTH leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DNTH vs IMVT vs ALXO vs RCUS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DNTH or IMVT or ALXO or RCUS or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 3% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — DNTH or IMVT or ALXO or RCUS or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -97. 5% for ALX Oncology Holdings Inc. (ALXO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +454. 4% versus ALXO's -94. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — DNTH or IMVT or ALXO or RCUS or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 98β — meaning RCUS is approximately 108% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — DNTH or IMVT or ALXO or RCUS or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -67. 3% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ALX Oncology Holdings Inc. grew EPS 26. 4% year-over-year, compared to -64. 7% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — DNTH or IMVT or ALXO or RCUS or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -79. 7% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -87. 4% for DNTH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DNTH leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is DNTH or IMVT or ALXO or RCUS or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALXO: 163.

2% to $4. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — DNTH or IMVT or ALXO or RCUS or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. DNTH, IMVT, ALXO, RCUS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is DNTH or IMVT or ALXO or RCUS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 9% yield, +454. 4% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +454. 4%, RCUS: +37. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between DNTH and IMVT and ALXO and RCUS and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (DNTH (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and ALXO (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: DNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALXO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while DNTH, IMVT, ALXO, RCUS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.