Regulated Electric
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ELC vs GEV vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Banks - Diversified
ELC vs GEV vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Renewable Utilities | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $9.26B | $263.10B | $892.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.29B | $39.38B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.80B | $9.38B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 43.3% | 19.9% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 22.6% | 3.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 33.4x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $30.93B | $0.00 | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $8.85B | $343.34B |
ELC vs GEV vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entergy Louisiana, … (ELC) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 716.0 | +616.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 159.5 | +59.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ELC vs GEV vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ELC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, current ratio 0.73x
- PEG 0.01 vs JPM's 0.81
GEV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 217.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs JPM's 475.6%
- 23.8% margin vs ELC's 13.6%
JPM plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 33.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs ELC's 13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs GEV's 1.99 | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +101.0% vs ELC's +6.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 27.9% vs 4.5% |
ELC vs GEV vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ELC vs GEV vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GEV and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 21.1x ELC's $13.3B. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ELC's 13.6%. On growth, GEV holds the edge at +16.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.3B | $39.4B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.5B | $2.2B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $9.4B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3.0B | $3.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.3% | +19.9% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.6% | +3.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +23.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.6% | +9.2% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.0% | +16.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.2% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ELC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.1x trailing earnings, ELC trades at a 91% valuation discount to GEV's 55.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs ELC's 2.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.3B | $263.1B | $892.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40.1B | $254.2B | $1.49T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.12x | 55.35x | 15.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.02x | 33.38x | 14.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.02x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.18x | 113.45x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.72x | 6.91x | 3.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 21.98x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 70.90x | 8.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $11 for ELC. ELC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ELC scores 6/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.6% | +79.7% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +15.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +27.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +6.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.80x | — | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30.9B | -$8.8B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $8.8B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30.9B | $0 | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.70x | — | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $74,748 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,201 for ELC. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +101.0% total return vs ELC's +6.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 95.5% vs ELC's 2.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.1% | +44.2% | -0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.9% | +101.0% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | +647.5% | +133.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.0% | +647.5% | +120.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.9% | +647.5% | +475.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.7% | +95.5% | +32.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ELC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ELC is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEV's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs GEV's 82.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 1.99x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.67 | $1181.95 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.88 | $479.04 | $266.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +82.8% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.1 | 44.1 | 65.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 2.3M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ELC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEV as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for GEV (target: $1134) vs 6.4% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, ELC offers the higher dividend yield at 11.92% vs GEV's 0.10%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1134.22 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.9% | +0.1% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.39 | $1.00 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | +3.9% |
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ELC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ELC vs GEV vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELC or GEV or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) offers the better valuation at 5. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELC or GEV or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) is the cheapest at 5.
1x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 55. 3x. On forward P/E, Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT wins at 0. 01x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELC or GEV or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +647. 5%, compared to +2. 0% for Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +647. 5% versus ELC's +27. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELC or GEV or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
75β versus GE Vernova Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning GEV is approximately 165% more volatile than ELC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 180% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ELC or GEV or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEV leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ELC or GEV or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 12. 8% for GE Vernova Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 3. 6% for GEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ELC or GEV or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 33. 4x for GE Vernova Inc. — 33. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GEV: 15. 8% to $1134. 22.
08Which pays a better dividend — ELC or GEV or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Entergy Louisiana, LLC COLLATERAL TR MT (ELC) offers the highest yield at 11. 9%, versus 0. 1% for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV).
09Is ELC or GEV or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +475. 6% 10Y return). GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +475. 6%, GEV: +647. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ELC and GEV and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ELC (Utilities) and GEV (Utilities) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ELC is a small-cap deep-value stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. ELC, JPM pay a dividend while GEV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.