Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
EQ logo
EQ
IMVT logo
IMVT
ARDX logo
ARDX
VKTX logo
VKTX
ABBV logo
ABBV
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EQ vs IMVT vs ARDX vs VKTX vs ABBV vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EQ
Equillium, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$271M
5Y Perf.-4.7%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.40B
5Y Perf.+228.9%
VKTX
Viking Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.33B
5Y Perf.+298.8%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$402.80B
5Y Perf.+132.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

EQ vs IMVT vs ARDX vs VKTX vs ABBV vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EQ logoEQ
IMVT logoIMVT
ARDX logoARDX
VKTX logoVKTX
ABBV logoABBV
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$271M$6.90B$1.40B$3.33B$402.80B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$428M$0.00$61.16B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$-506M$-58M$-472M$4.23B$57.05B
Gross Margin91.9%70.2%60.0%
Operating Margin-8.7%26.7%25.9%
Forward P/E16.0x14.4x
Total Debt$719K$72K$212M$137K$69.07B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$30M$902M$68M$166M$5.23B$343.34B

EQ vs IMVT vs ARDX vs VKTX vs ABBV vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EQ
IMVT
ARDX
VKTX
ABBV
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Equillium, Inc. (EQ)10095.3-4.7%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100138.1+38.1%
Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX)100328.9+228.9%
Viking Therapeutics… (VKTX)100398.8+298.8%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100232.0+132.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EQ vs IMVT vs ARDX vs VKTX vs ABBV vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ABBV leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. EQ and ARDX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇ABBV emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
EQ
Equillium, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

EQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.32x
  • +6.3% vs VKTX's +0.6%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 6 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARDX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 98.4%
  • 22.1% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1%
Best for: growth exposure
VKTX
Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

VKTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 22.0% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 237.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Income Pick

ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 2.9%
  • Beta 0.14, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.67x
  • Beta 0.14 vs IMVT's 1.66
  • 2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 16.0x)
  • 20.4% margin vs ARDX's -13.6%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARDX logoARDX22.1% revenue growth vs VKTX's -270.1%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 16.0x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs ARDX's -13.6%
Stability / SafetyABBV logoABBVBeta 0.14 vs IMVT's 1.66
DividendsABBV logoABBV2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)EQ logoEQ+6.3% vs VKTX's +0.6%
Efficiency (ROA)ABBV logoABBV3.1% ROA vs VKTX's -65.3%, ROIC 23.9% vs -44.4%

EQ vs IMVT vs ARDX vs VKTX vs ABBV vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
EQEquillium, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARDXArdelyx, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
57.5%$378M
Product, IBSRELA
41.7%$274M
License
0.8%$5M
VKTXViking Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

EQ vs IMVT vs ARDX vs VKTX vs ABBV vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLABBVLAGGINGVKTX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ARDX and ABBV and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and VKTX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARDX's -13.6%. On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$428M$0$61.2B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$20M-$532M-$35M-$502M$24.5B$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M-$506M-$58M-$472M$4.2B$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M-$407M-$37M-$340M$18.7B$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+91.9%+70.2%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-8.7%+26.7%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.6%+6.9%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.8%+30.6%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+27.5%+10.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+77.0%-14.1%+11.8%-2.3%+57.4%+16.0%
Evenly matched — ARDX and ABBV and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 83% valuation discount to ABBV's 96.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 16.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.4x.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$271M$6.9B$1.4B$3.3B$402.8B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$241M$6.0B$1.5B$3.2B$466.6B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.21x-12.14x-21.88x-9.01x96.09x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.96x14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.53x18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.43x6.59x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.03x7.19x8.21x5.07x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.61x8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ABBV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-71 for VKTX. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs EQ's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-61.4%-68.2%-38.1%-71.3%+62.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-53.7%-62.2%-11.8%-65.3%+3.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-88.8%-10.7%-44.4%+23.9%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-98.1%-68.3%-10.6%-51.8%+21.5%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9123265
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.00x1.27x0.00x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$30M-$902M$144M-$166M$63.8B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$902M$68M$166M$5.2B$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$719,000$72,000$212M$137,000$69.1B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.28x-15687.44x3.28x0.74x
ABBV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VKTX five years ago would be worth $47,286 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,691 for EQ. Over the past 12 months, EQ leads with a +627.0% total return vs VKTX's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQ at 58.2% vs VKTX's 6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+83.7%+29.8%-7.5%-18.8%+0.8%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+627.0%+110.9%+53.0%+0.6%+21.9%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+295.8%+55.0%+42.6%+21.1%+79.3%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-53.1%+213.0%+207.6%+372.9%+123.7%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.9%+237.9%+162.2%+2200.0%+362.2%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+58.2%+15.7%+12.6%+6.6%+21.5%+33.6%
EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ABBV and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs VKTX's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.58x1.66x1.01x1.64x0.14x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.43$36.27$8.40$43.15$244.81$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.27$14.32$3.49$22.96$181.73$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.9%+92.7%+67.7%+66.6%+93.0%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.757.945.041.562.859.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded565K1.9M3.4M2.0M4.6M7.0M
Evenly matched — ABBV and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: EQ as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy", VKTX as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 225.6% upside for VKTX (target: $94) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.89% vs JPM's 1.86%.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.VKTX logoVKTXViking Therapeuti…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.25$43.67$17.00$93.60$256.92$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts122316244161
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises4315
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.57$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.2%+3.9%
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallAbbVie Inc. (ABBV)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EQ vs IMVT vs ARDX vs VKTX vs ABBV vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EQ or IMVT or ARDX or VKTX or ABBV or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ardelyx, Inc.

(ARDX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equillium, Inc. (EQ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EQ or IMVT or ARDX or VKTX or ABBV or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus AbbVie Inc. at 96. 1x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EQ or IMVT or ARDX or VKTX or ABBV or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Viking Therapeutics, Inc.

(VKTX) delivered a total return of +372. 9%, compared to -53. 1% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VKTX returned +22. 0% versus EQ's -79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EQ or IMVT or ARDX or VKTX or ABBV or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately 1118% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EQ or IMVT or ARDX or VKTX or ABBV or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardelyx, Inc.

(ARDX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -215. 8% for Viking Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARDX leads at 98. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EQ or IMVT or ARDX or VKTX or ABBV or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -15. 1% for Ardelyx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -10. 1% for ARDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARDX leads at 89. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EQ or IMVT or ARDX or VKTX or ABBV or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for AbbVie Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VKTX: 225. 6% to $93. 60.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EQ or IMVT or ARDX or VKTX or ABBV or JPM?

In this comparison, ABBV (2.

9% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. EQ, IMVT, ARDX, VKTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is EQ or IMVT or ARDX or VKTX or ABBV or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 2. 9% yield, +362. 2% 10Y return). Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +362. 2%, VKTX: +22. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EQ and IMVT and ARDX and VKTX and ABBV and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (EQ (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and ARDX (Healthcare) and VKTX (Healthcare) and ABBV (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; VKTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. ABBV, JPM pay a dividend while EQ, IMVT, ARDX, VKTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.