Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EQ vs KMDA vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
EQ vs KMDA vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $271M | $429M | $432M | $3.61B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $182M | $58M | $1.10B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $20M | $-151M | $376M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.2% | 46.8% | 91.5% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.0% | -217.9% | 7.4% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.4x | 176.7x | 54.2x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $719K | $12M | $14M | $52M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $75M | $308M | $178M | $10.27B |
EQ vs KMDA vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equillium, Inc. (EQ) | 100 | 95.3 | -4.7% |
| Kamada Ltd. (KMDA) | 100 | 95.9 | -4.1% |
| Prothena Corporatio… (PRTA) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 43.5 | -56.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EQ vs KMDA vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.32x
- Beta 0.58, current ratio 10.32x
- Beta 0.58 vs PRTA's 1.50, lower leverage
- +6.3% vs ACAD's -3.0%
KMDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.28, yield 2.9%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (17.4x vs 25.3x)
- 2.9% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PRTA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACAD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 34.3% margin vs PRTA's -260.9%
- 26.2% ROA vs EQ's -53.7%, ROIC 10.0% vs -88.8%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs KMDA's 112.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs PRTA's -260.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs PRTA's 1.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.3% vs ACAD's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs EQ's -53.7%, ROIC 10.0% vs -88.8% |
EQ vs KMDA vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EQ vs KMDA vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
KMDA leads 1 • EQ leads 1 • PRTA leads 0 • ACAD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PRTA and ACAD and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and EQ operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTA's -2.6%. On growth, PRTA holds the edge at +17.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $182M | $58M | $1.1B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | $41M | -$124M | $96M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $20M | -$151M | $376M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $17M | -$81M | $212M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +41.2% | +46.8% | +91.5% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +14.0% | -2.2% | +7.4% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +11.2% | -2.6% | +34.3% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +9.1% | -140.6% | +19.4% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.8% | +17.1% | +9.7% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.0% | 0.0% | +153.6% | -81.8% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
KMDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 66% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KMDA's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $429M | $432M | $3.6B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $241M | $365M | $138M | $3.5B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.21x | 20.11x | -1.82x | 9.21x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.40x | 176.66x | 54.20x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.88x | — | 25.09x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.38x | 44.60x | 3.37x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.03x | 1.61x | 1.58x | 2.94x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.34x | — | 34.34x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-61 for EQ. EQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PRTA's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.4% | +7.7% | -49.9% | +35.6% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.7% | +5.4% | -42.3% | +26.2% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -88.8% | +9.9% | -21.0% | +10.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.1% | +8.0% | -47.0% | +10.1% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.04x | 0.05x | 0.04x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$64M | -$294M | -$126M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $75M | $308M | $178M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $719,000 | $12M | $14M | $52M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 26.87x | — | — | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,731 for PRTA. Over the past 12 months, EQ leads with a +627.0% total return vs ACAD's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQ at 58.2% vs PRTA's -51.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +83.7% | +9.4% | -10.3% | -19.3% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +627.0% | +10.8% | +62.7% | -3.0% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +295.8% | +49.4% | -88.7% | -14.3% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.1% | +33.7% | -82.7% | -22.6% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.9% | +112.7% | -82.0% | -44.6% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.2% | +14.3% | -51.7% | -5.0% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTA's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PRTA's 69.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 1.28x | 1.50x | 1.10x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.43 | $9.35 | $11.80 | $27.81 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $6.50 | $4.95 | $19.69 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.9% | +79.6% | +69.9% | +75.8% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.7 | 41.2 | 35.6 | 47.9 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 565K | 46K | 447K | 1.4M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KMDA and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EQ as "Buy", KMDA as "Buy", PRTA as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 130.3% upside for PRTA (target: $19) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KMDA offers the higher dividend yield at 2.88% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.25 | $11.00 | $19.00 | $34.78 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 6 | 28 | 37 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.21 | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). KMDA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EQ vs KMDA vs PRTA vs ACAD vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQ or KMDA or PRTA or ACAD or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kamada Ltd.
(KMDA) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (54. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equillium, Inc. (EQ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EQ or KMDA or PRTA or ACAD or KO?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Kamada Ltd. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EQ or KMDA or PRTA or ACAD or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -82. 7% for Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus PRTA's -82. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EQ or KMDA or PRTA or ACAD or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Prothena Corporation plc's 1. 50β — meaning PRTA is approximately -850% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Equillium, Inc. (EQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EQ or KMDA or PRTA or ACAD or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kamada Ltd.
(KMDA) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -99. 6% for Prothena Corporation plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EQ or KMDA or PRTA or ACAD or KO?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -25. 2% for Prothena Corporation plc — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1905. 8% for PRTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EQ or KMDA or PRTA or ACAD or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kamada Ltd.
(KMDA) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 176. 7x for Prothena Corporation plc — 159. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTA: 130. 3% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EQ or KMDA or PRTA or ACAD or KO?
In this comparison, KMDA (2.
9% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. EQ, PRTA, ACAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EQ or KMDA or PRTA or ACAD or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Prothena Corporation plc (PRTA) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, PRTA: -82. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EQ and KMDA and PRTA and ACAD and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (EQ (Healthcare) and KMDA (Healthcare) and PRTA (Healthcare) and ACAD (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KMDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KMDA, KO pay a dividend while EQ, PRTA, ACAD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.