Leisure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ESCA vs DKNG vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Banks - Diversified
ESCA vs DKNG vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $256M | $14.38B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $240M | $6.29B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $59M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 27.1% | 41.8% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 0.6% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 122.9x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $1.93B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $1.60B | $343.34B |
ESCA vs DKNG vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Escalade, Incorpora… (ESCA) | 100 | 133.5 | +33.5% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESCA vs DKNG vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESCA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 11.4%, current ratio 4.28x
- Beta 0.87, yield 3.2%, current ratio 4.28x
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs ESCA's -4.5%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 195.9%
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 122.9x)
- 20.4% margin vs DKNG's 0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs ESCA's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 122.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs DKNG's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.2% vs DKNG's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.9% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 7.5% vs 4.5% |
ESCA vs DKNG vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ESCA vs DKNG vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1165.8x ESCA's $240M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DKNG's 0.9%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +16.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $240M | $6.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $313M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $59M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $679M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +41.8% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +0.6% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +0.9% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +10.8% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.6% | +16.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.2% | +157.7% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ESCA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 15% valuation discount to ESCA's 18.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ESCA's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 56.6x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $256M | $14.4B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $264M | $14.7B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.82x | -3580.25x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.25x | 122.88x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.11x | 56.63x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.07x | 2.37x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 22.77x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.00x | 22.20x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ESCA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for DKNG. ESCA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESCA scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +7.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +1.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | -0.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | -0.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 3.06x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $330M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $1.6B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $1.9B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.31x | 4.48x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,729 for DKNG. Over the past 12 months, ESCA leads with a +33.2% total return vs DKNG's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs DKNG's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | -18.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.2% | -23.6% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.9% | +13.9% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.6% | -42.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.9% | +195.9% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.4% | +4.4% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ESCA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ESCA is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 59.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.87x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.32 | $48.78 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.41 | $20.46 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.4% | +59.5% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 72.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 12.1M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ESCA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ESCA as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for DKNG (target: $36) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, ESCA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $35.75 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +5.8% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ESCA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ESCA vs DKNG vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESCA or DKNG or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESCA or DKNG or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Escalade, Incorporated at 18. 8x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESCA or DKNG or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -42. 7% for DraftKings Inc. (DKNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus ESCA's +136. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESCA or DKNG or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 9% more volatile than ESCA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESCA or DKNG or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus -4. 5% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESCA or DKNG or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 1% for DraftKings Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESCA or DKNG or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 122. 9x for DraftKings Inc. — 108. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 23. 3% to $35. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESCA or DKNG or JPM?
In this comparison, ESCA (3.
2% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DKNG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ESCA or DKNG or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, DKNG: +195. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESCA and DKNG and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ESCA (Consumer Cyclical) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ESCA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. ESCA, JPM pay a dividend while DKNG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.