Electrical Equipment & Parts
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ESP vs CAT vs DE vs DRS vs CNH vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Aerospace & Defense
Agricultural - Machinery
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
ESP vs CAT vs DE vs DRS vs CNH vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense | Agricultural - Machinery | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $183M | $458.69B | $159.06B | $12.29B | $12.98B | $341.71B | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $70.75B | $46.86B | $3.69B | $18.09B | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $9.42B | $4.78B | $290M | $386M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 32.5% | 35.4% | 24.2% | 31.4% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | 16.6% | 18.4% | 9.9% | 14.6% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 40.0x | 32.6x | 35.7x | 25.8x | 24.3x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $43.33B | $63.94B | $470M | $27.03B | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $647M | $3.23B | $10.27B | $343.34B |
ESP vs CAT vs DE vs DRS vs CNH vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Espey Mfg. & Electr… (ESP) | 100 | 352.0 | +252.0% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 779.3 | +679.3% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 375.0 | +275.0% |
| Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) | 100 | 704.6 | +604.6% |
| CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH) | 100 | 148.8 | +48.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESP vs CAT vs DE vs DRS vs CNH vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 31.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- PEG 0.37 vs DRS's 2.84
- 13.5% revenue growth vs DE's -11.6%
- Lower P/E (16.2x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.37 vs 2.17
CAT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs DRS's 36.6%
- +175.7% vs CNH's -17.6%
DE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.54 vs CAT's 1.64
Among these 7 stocks, DRS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CNH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.14, yield 2.5%, current ratio 7.75x
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.23, yield 2.6%
- 27.8% margin vs CNH's 2.1%
- 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs DE's 1.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs CNH's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.6%
In this particular matchup, JPM is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.5% revenue growth vs DE's -11.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.37 vs 2.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CNH's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs CAT's 1.64 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs DE's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +175.7% vs CNH's -17.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CNH's 0.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 6.6% |
ESP vs CAT vs DE vs DRS vs CNH vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ESP vs CAT vs DE vs DRS vs CNH vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
CNH leads 1 • DRS leads 1 • CAT leads 1 • ESP leads 0 • DE leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 6635.3x ESP's $42M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNH's 2.1%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $70.8B | $46.9B | $3.7B | $18.1B | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $14.0B | $10.3B | $436M | $3.3B | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $9.4B | $4.8B | $290M | $386M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $11.4B | $3.8B | $397M | $1.8B | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +32.5% | +35.4% | +24.2% | +31.4% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +16.6% | +18.4% | +9.9% | +14.6% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +13.3% | +10.2% | +7.8% | +2.1% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +16.2% | +8.0% | +10.7% | +10.2% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +22.2% | +6.7% | +5.9% | -0.1% | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +30.2% | -1.4% | +21.1% | -94.4% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CNH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 69% valuation discount to CAT's 52.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ESP offers better value at 0.46x vs DRS's 3.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $183M | $458.7B | $159.1B | $12.3B | $13.0B | $341.7B | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $164M | $492.0B | $214.7B | $12.1B | $36.8B | $376.9B | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.19x | 52.35x | 31.85x | 44.74x | 25.51x | 26.12x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.17x | 39.97x | 32.60x | 35.72x | 25.81x | 24.27x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.46x | 1.86x | 1.95x | 3.56x | — | 2.34x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.09x | 36.52x | 20.17x | 27.47x | 10.76x | 25.45x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 6.79x | 3.56x | 3.37x | 0.72x | 7.13x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.23x | 21.69x | 6.16x | 4.54x | 1.67x | 9.99x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.99x | 44.65x | 49.23x | 54.15x | 6.50x | 64.52x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DRS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $5 for CNH. DRS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNH's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DRS scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.4% | +47.5% | +18.2% | +10.8% | +4.9% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.5% | +10.0% | +4.5% | +6.8% | +0.9% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.7% | +15.9% | +7.8% | +10.5% | +6.6% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.6% | +19.1% | +11.7% | +10.8% | +8.3% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.03x | 2.46x | 0.17x | 3.45x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | $33.4B | $55.7B | -$177M | $23.8B | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $647M | $3.2B | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $43.3B | $63.9B | $470M | $27.0B | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.22x | 3.07x | 40.86x | 1.76x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $48,451 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,394 for CNH. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +175.7% total return vs CNH's -17.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 60.8% vs CNH's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.1% | +65.2% | +26.6% | +33.0% | +12.9% | +16.4% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.2% | +175.7% | +13.5% | +5.0% | -17.6% | +17.7% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +270.2% | +315.8% | +48.9% | +175.0% | -21.1% | +39.3% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +333.5% | +384.5% | +87.3% | +263.9% | -26.1% | +65.3% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.4% | +1247.4% | +636.2% | +3659.7% | +68.5% | +115.0% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.7% | +60.8% | +14.2% | +40.1% | -7.6% | +11.7% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs CNH's 73.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.64x | 0.54x | 1.15x | 1.14x | -0.23x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.77 | $994.49 | $674.19 | $50.59 | $14.27 | $84.04 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.00 | $356.96 | $433.00 | $32.43 | $9.00 | $65.35 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +99.1% | +87.4% | +91.1% | +73.3% | +94.5% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 61.4 | 58.1 | 52.5 | 45.5 | 49.2 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34K | 2.5M | 1.1M | 879K | 12.5M | 13.6M | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ESP as "Hold", CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", DRS as "Buy", CNH as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.1% upside for CNH (target: $13) vs -10.5% for CAT (target: $882). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs CAT's 0.59%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $882.20 | $690.00 | $53.33 | $13.09 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 53 | 46 | 9 | 14 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +2.5% | +2.6% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 32 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.96 | $5.86 | $6.33 | $0.36 | $0.27 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +0.7% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.8% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). CNH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ESP vs CAT vs DE vs DRS vs CNH vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESP or CAT or DE or DRS or CNH or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Espey Mfg.
& Electronics Corp. (ESP) is the stronger pick with 13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 6% for Deere & Company (DE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESP or CAT or DE or DRS or CNH or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 52. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. wins at 0. 37x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 84x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESP or CAT or DE or DRS or CNH or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +384. 5%, compared to -26. 1% for CNH Industrial N. V. (CNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRS returned +36. 6% versus CNH's +68. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESP or CAT or DE or DRS or CNH or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning CAT is approximately -801% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for CNH Industrial N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESP or CAT or DE or DRS or CNH or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Espey Mfg.
& Electronics Corp. (ESP) is pulling ahead at 13. 5% versus -11. 6% for Deere & Company (DE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. grew EPS 31. 9% year-over-year, compared to -58. 6% for CNH Industrial N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESP leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESP or CAT or DE or DRS or CNH or KO or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 9. 5% for DRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESP or CAT or DE or DRS or CNH or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 37x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 84x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Caterpillar Inc. — 25. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNH: 25. 1% to $13. 09.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESP or CAT or DE or DRS or CNH or KO or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 6% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).
09Is ESP or CAT or DE or DRS or CNH or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, DRS: +36. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESP and CAT and DE and DRS and CNH and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ESP (Industrials) and CAT (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and DRS (Industrials) and CNH (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ESP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CNH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.