Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
EVMN logo
EVMN
CLDX logo
CLDX
IMVT logo
IMVT
ARDX logo
ARDX
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EVMN vs CLDX vs IMVT vs ARDX vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EVMN
Evommune, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$625M
5Y Perf.+0.4%
CLDX
Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.08B
5Y Perf.+140.5%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+38.1%
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.40B
5Y Perf.+228.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%

EVMN vs CLDX vs IMVT vs ARDX vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EVMN logoEVMN
CLDX logoCLDX
IMVT logoIMVT
ARDX logoARDX
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$625M$2.08B$6.90B$1.40B$896.00B
Revenue (TTM)$13M$820K$0.00$428M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-69M$-284M$-506M$-58M$57.05B
Gross Margin89.3%-4.1%91.9%60.0%
Operating Margin-6.2%-376.9%-8.7%25.9%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$2M$2M$72K$212M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$44M$29M$902M$68M$343.34B

EVMN vs CLDX vs IMVT vs ARDX vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EVMN
CLDX
IMVT
ARDX
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Celldex Therapeutic… (CLDX)100240.5+140.5%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100138.1+38.1%
Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX)100328.9+228.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EVMN vs CLDX vs IMVT vs ARDX vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Evommune, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. IMVT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
EVMN
Evommune, Inc.
The Growth Play

EVMN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 85.7%, EPS growth 4.0%
  • 85.7% revenue growth vs CLDX's -78.6%
Best for: growth exposure
CLDX
Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CLDX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.54, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 10.49x
  • Beta 1.54, current ratio 10.49x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 237.9% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • +110.9% vs EVMN's +2.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
ARDX
Ardelyx, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, ARDX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • 20.4% margin vs CLDX's -346.0%
  • Beta 0.94 vs IMVT's 1.66
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEVMN logoEVMN85.7% revenue growth vs CLDX's -78.6%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs CLDX's -346.0%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs IMVT's 1.66
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IMVT logoIMVT+110.9% vs EVMN's +2.0%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

EVMN vs CLDX vs IMVT vs ARDX vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EVMNEvommune, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CLDXCelldex Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Grant
93.7%$1M
Service
6.3%$97,000
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARDXArdelyx, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
57.5%$378M
Product, IBSRELA
41.7%$274M
License
0.8%$5M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

EVMN vs CLDX vs IMVT vs ARDX vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGARDX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLDX's -346.0%. On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEVMN logoEVMNEvommune, Inc.CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$13M$820,000$0$428M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$80M-$306M-$532M-$35M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$69M-$284M-$506M-$58M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$77M-$226M-$407M-$37M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.3%-4.1%+91.9%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.2%-376.9%-8.7%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.3%-346.0%-13.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.9%-275.6%-8.8%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-97.8%+27.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+38.8%-45.7%-14.1%+11.8%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricEVMN logoEVMNEvommune, Inc.CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$625M$2.1B$6.9B$1.4B$896.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$583M$2.1B$6.0B$1.5B$1.50T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-9.10x-8.02x-12.14x-21.88x16.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue48.09x1387.11x3.43x3.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.04x3.94x7.19x8.21x2.47x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for EVMN. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricEVMN logoEVMNEvommune, Inc.CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.2%-50.7%-68.2%-38.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-59.7%-46.6%-62.2%-11.8%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-61.9%-35.2%-10.7%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-63.6%-44.7%-68.3%-10.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943235
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.00x0.00x1.27x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$42M-$27M-$902M$144M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$44M$29M$902M$68M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$2M$72,000$212M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-10043.71x-0.28x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — IMVT and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,195 for EVMN. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +110.9% total return vs EVMN's +2.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs CLDX's -5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEVMN logoEVMNEvommune, Inc.CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.6%+15.8%+29.8%-7.5%-0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+2.0%+53.7%+110.9%+53.0%+21.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.0%-15.7%+55.0%+42.6%+138.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.0%+2.1%+213.0%+207.6%+118.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.0%-48.5%+237.9%+162.2%+465.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.6%-5.5%+15.7%+12.6%+33.6%
Evenly matched — IMVT and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs EVMN's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEVMN logoEVMNEvommune, Inc.CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.63x1.54x1.66x1.01x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$33.20$35.79$36.27$8.40$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.88$19.52$14.32$3.49$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+59.7%+87.4%+92.7%+67.7%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.345.757.945.059.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded358K768K1.9M3.4M7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: EVMN as "Buy", CLDX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 198.8% upside for ARDX (target: $17) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricEVMN logoEVMNEvommune, Inc.CLDX logoCLDXCelldex Therapeut…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARDX logoARDXArdelyx, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$48.40$49.00$43.67$17.00$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts319231661
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EVMN vs CLDX vs IMVT vs ARDX vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EVMN or CLDX or IMVT or ARDX or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Evommune, Inc.

(EVMN) is the stronger pick with 85. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -78. 6% for Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (CLDX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evommune, Inc. (EVMN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — EVMN or CLDX or IMVT or ARDX or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to +2. 0% for Evommune, Inc. (EVMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CLDX's -48. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — EVMN or CLDX or IMVT or ARDX or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately 76% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — EVMN or CLDX or IMVT or ARDX or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Evommune, Inc.

(EVMN) is pulling ahead at 85. 7% versus -78. 6% for Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. (CLDX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Evommune, Inc. grew EPS 4. 0% year-over-year, compared to -59. 2% for Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARDX leads at 98. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — EVMN or CLDX or IMVT or ARDX or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -172. 5% for Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -191. 6% for CLDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLDX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is EVMN or CLDX or IMVT or ARDX or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARDX: 198.

8% to $17. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — EVMN or CLDX or IMVT or ARDX or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. EVMN, CLDX, IMVT, ARDX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is EVMN or CLDX or IMVT or ARDX or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Evommune, Inc. (EVMN) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, EVMN: +2. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between EVMN and CLDX and IMVT and ARDX and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (EVMN (Healthcare) and CLDX (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and ARDX (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EVMN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLDX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while EVMN, CLDX, IMVT, ARDX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.