Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HBNC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI vs FIS vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Banks - Diversified
HBNC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI vs FIS vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.01B | $954M | $730M | $207M | $20.26B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $372M | $310M | $90M | $11.66B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-148M | $89M | $69M | $14M | $2.67B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | -25.0% | 64.0% | 69.1% | 54.7% | 37.6% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -203.2% | 27.5% | 26.2% | 7.0% | 17.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 10.1x | 10.0x | 11.8x | 6.2x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $404M | $826M | $117M | $52M | $4.01B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $473M | $52M | $119M | $599M | $343.34B |
HBNC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI vs FIS vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Bancorp, In… (HBNC) | 100 | 184.8 | +84.8% |
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 244.2 | +144.2% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 238.9 | +138.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBNC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI vs FIS vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBNC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.6% vs JPM's 2.2%
MBWM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 10.8%
- 23.9% margin vs HBNC's -154.3%
Among these 6 stocks, IBCP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs HBNC's 0.97, lower leverage
- +52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
- PEG 0.26 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
- 5.4% revenue growth vs HBNC's -71.0%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 194.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs HBNC's -71.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.9% margin vs HBNC's -154.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs HBNC's 0.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs HBNC's -2.2%, ROIC 6.0% vs -9.3% |
HBNC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI vs FIS vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HBNC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI vs FIS vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MBWM leads in 1 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • HBNC leads 0 • IBCP leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MBWM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3112.4x CZWI's $90M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HBNC's -154.3%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $372M | $310M | $90M | $11.7B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$186M | $107M | $89M | $9M | $4.1B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$148M | $89M | $69M | $14M | $2.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | $11M | $70M | $11M | $2.8B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -25.0% | +64.0% | +69.1% | +54.7% | +37.6% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +27.5% | +26.2% | +7.0% | +17.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -154.3% | +23.9% | +22.1% | +16.0% | +22.9% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +68.5% | +3.0% | +22.6% | +12.4% | +23.9% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +30.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | +14.8% | +2.3% | +63.0% | +30.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 81% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.67x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $954M | $730M | $207M | $20.3B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $1.3B | $795M | $140M | $23.7B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.27x | 10.11x | 10.85x | 14.70x | 52.27x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.40x | 10.12x | 9.99x | 11.79x | 6.24x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.67x | 2.06x | 2.90x | 2.14x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.26x | 9.78x | 15.69x | 6.50x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.81x | 2.56x | 2.32x | 2.29x | 1.90x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 1.24x | 1.47x | 1.11x | 1.46x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.29x | 85.07x | 10.41x | 19.90x | 7.21x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IBCP and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-15 for HBNC. IBCP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.7% | +13.5% | +14.2% | +7.8% | +18.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +1.4% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +7.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.3% | +5.5% | +10.2% | +2.0% | +6.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | +8.0% | +2.6% | +0.6% | +6.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 1.14x | 0.23x | 0.28x | 0.29x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $338M | $353M | $65M | -$67M | $3.4B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $473M | $52M | $119M | $599M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $404M | $826M | $117M | $52M | $4.0B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.62x | 0.79x | 0.91x | 0.16x | 21.16x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | +17.6% | +12.0% | +24.3% | -38.9% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.7% | +26.7% | +16.4% | +52.1% | -49.4% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.4% | +99.7% | +110.4% | +153.7% | -18.9% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.7% | +97.2% | +80.9% | +69.0% | -67.3% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.4% | +181.0% | +194.4% | +149.0% | -25.6% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.5% | +25.9% | +28.1% | +36.4% | -6.8% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HBNC and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBNC's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBNC currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.73x | 0.72x | 0.50x | 0.61x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.75 | $55.77 | $39.16 | $22.62 | $82.74 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.34 | $42.69 | $29.63 | $12.83 | $37.91 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +99.0% | +90.6% | +94.9% | +47.4% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.3 | 60.0 | 61.2 | 51.2 | 30.8 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 306K | 115K | 135K | 41K | 5.6M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HBNC as "Buy", MBWM as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 3.3% for MBWM (target: $57). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $57.00 | $38.00 | — | $62.88 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 37 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.7% | +2.9% | +1.7% | +4.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | $1.47 | $1.03 | $0.37 | $1.63 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +3.0% | +7.0% | +3.9% |
MBWM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HBNC vs MBWM vs IBCP vs CZWI vs FIS vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBNC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI or FIS or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -71. 0% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBNC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI or FIS or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 10.
1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBNC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI or FIS or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBNC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI or FIS or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Horizon Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning HBNC is approximately 95% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBNC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI or FIS or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -71. 0% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mercantile Bank Corporation grew EPS 10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -493. 8% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBNC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI or FIS or JPM?
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
9% net margin versus -145. 9% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBWM leads at 27. 5% versus -193. 4% for HBNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBNC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI or FIS or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBNC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI or FIS or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is HBNC or MBWM or IBCP or CZWI or FIS or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, HBNC: +128. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBNC and MBWM and IBCP and CZWI and FIS and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (HBNC (Financial Services) and MBWM (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HBNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.