Regulated Electric
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMSR vs GEV vs JPM vs PLUG vs BAC vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Banks - Diversified
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
IMSR vs GEV vs JPM vs PLUG vs BAC vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Renewable Utilities | Banks - Diversified | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $625M | $263.10B | $892.31B | $3.21B | $421.65B | $348.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $39.38B | $280.33B | $740M | $191.57B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $9.38B | $57.05B | $-1.68B | $30.51B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.9% | 60.0% | -25.7% | 56.1% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.9% | 25.9% | -82.7% | 19.7% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 33.4x | 14.3x | — | 12.5x | 24.7x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $0.00 | $942.38B | $997M | $365.90B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $8.85B | $343.34B | $555M | $231.84B | $10.27B |
IMSR vs GEV vs JPM vs PLUG vs BAC vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 716.0 | +616.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 159.5 | +59.5% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 132.2 | +32.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMSR vs GEV vs JPM vs PLUG vs BAC vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMSR doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
GEV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 217.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs JPM's 475.6%
- 15.2% ROA vs PLUG's -58.8%, ROIC 27.9% vs -24.7%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.21
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 24.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.21
PLUG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.
- 12.9% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0%
- +113.7% vs IMSR's -66.7%
BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 0.86, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 0.86 vs IMSR's 4.60
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs PLUG's -227.1%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 24.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.21 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs PLUG's -227.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs IMSR's 4.60 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +113.7% vs IMSR's -66.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs PLUG's -58.8%, ROIC 27.9% vs -24.7% |
IMSR vs GEV vs JPM vs PLUG vs BAC vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMSR vs GEV vs JPM vs PLUG vs BAC vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
GEV leads 2 • BAC leads 1 • IMSR leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and IMSR operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, PLUG holds the edge at +22.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $39.4B | $280.3B | $740M | $191.6B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | $2.2B | $81.4B | -$574M | $40.0B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | $9.4B | $57.0B | -$1.7B | $30.5B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$242M | $3.6B | $100.9B | -$666M | $12.6B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +19.9% | +60.0% | -25.7% | +56.1% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +3.9% | +25.9% | -82.7% | +19.7% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +23.8% | +20.4% | -2.3% | +15.9% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +9.2% | +36.0% | -90.1% | +6.6% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.1% | — | +22.3% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.3% | +18.2% | +16.0% | +14.3% | +18.3% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BAC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.6x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 74% valuation discount to GEV's 55.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $625M | $263.1B | $892.3B | $3.2B | $421.6B | $348.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $530M | $254.2B | $1.49T | $3.7B | $555.7B | $383.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.38x | 55.35x | 15.93x | -1.99x | 14.63x | 26.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 33.38x | 14.34x | — | 12.52x | 24.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | — | 0.95x | 2.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 113.45x | 18.32x | — | 13.89x | 25.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.91x | 3.19x | 4.52x | 2.20x | 7.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 21.98x | 2.46x | 3.23x | 1.39x | 10.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 70.90x | 8.85x | — | 33.43x | 65.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $-133 for PLUG. IMSR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs PLUG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.4% | +79.7% | +15.9% | -133.4% | +10.1% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.0% | +15.2% | +1.3% | -58.8% | +0.9% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.8% | +27.9% | +4.5% | -24.7% | +3.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.7% | +6.6% | +8.9% | -28.1% | +4.5% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | 2.60x | 0.99x | 1.21x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | -$8.8B | $599.0B | $442M | $134.1B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $8.8B | $343.3B | $555M | $231.8B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $0 | $942.4B | $997M | $365.9B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.45x | — | 0.74x | -8.61x | 0.48x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $74,748 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $959 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, PLUG leads with a +113.7% total return vs IMSR's -66.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 95.5% vs PLUG's -36.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | +44.2% | -0.9% | +25.6% | +0.9% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.7% | +101.0% | +20.3% | +113.7% | +28.3% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +647.5% | +133.8% | -74.1% | +100.9% | +42.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +647.5% | +120.7% | -90.4% | +46.7% | +63.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +647.5% | +475.6% | +60.0% | +376.2% | +118.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.7% | +95.5% | +32.7% | -36.3% | +26.2% | +12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BAC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMSR's 4.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs IMSR's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.60x | 1.99x | 0.94x | 2.76x | 0.86x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.16 | $1181.95 | $337.25 | $4.58 | $57.55 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.33 | $479.04 | $266.85 | $1.03 | $44.06 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +82.8% | +94.7% | +61.1% | +97.1% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 44.1 | 65.0 | 34.3 | 71.7 | 60.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 2.3M | 7.0M | 76.6M | 31.6M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEV as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.6% upside for IMSR (target: $14) vs -33.9% for PLUG (target: $2). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.52% vs GEV's 0.10%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $1134.22 | $339.75 | $1.85 | $61.13 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 61 | 38 | 54 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | +1.9% | — | +2.3% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 15 | — | 12 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | $5.95 | — | $1.27 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | +3.9% | 0.0% | +5.1% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). GEV leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
IMSR vs GEV vs JPM vs PLUG vs BAC vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMSR or GEV or JPM or PLUG or BAC or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Plug Power Inc.
(PLUG) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMSR or GEV or JPM or PLUG or BAC or KO?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
6x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 55. 3x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMSR or GEV or JPM or PLUG or BAC or KO?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +647. 5%, compared to -90. 4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +647. 5% versus IMSR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMSR or GEV or JPM or PLUG or BAC or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Terrestrial Energy Inc. 's 4. 60β — meaning IMSR is approximately -2396% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMSR or GEV or JPM or PLUG or BAC or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plug Power Inc.
(PLUG) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEV leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMSR or GEV or JPM or PLUG or BAC or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -95. 7% for PLUG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMSR or GEV or JPM or PLUG or BAC or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 33. 4x for GE Vernova Inc. — 20. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMSR: 78. 6% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMSR or GEV or JPM or PLUG or BAC or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), BAC (2. 3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), GEV (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. IMSR, PLUG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMSR or GEV or JPM or PLUG or BAC or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +118. 2% 10Y return). Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a higher beta of 4. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +118. 2%, IMSR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMSR and GEV and JPM and PLUG and BAC and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMSR (Energy) and GEV (Utilities) and JPM (Financial Services) and PLUG (Industrials) and BAC (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, BAC, KO pay a dividend while IMSR, GEV, PLUG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.