Regulated Electric
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Regulated Electric
Renewable Utilities
Aerospace & Defense
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Industrial - Machinery | Regulated Electric | Renewable Utilities | Aerospace & Defense | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $625M | $1.04B | $10.57B | $1.43B | $17.77B | $348.25B | $892.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $19M | $3.38B | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $-31M | $-129M | $-386M | $345M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | 22.4% | 16.8% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | -38.1% | 11.0% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 41.3x | 24.7x | 14.3x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $3M | $1M | $0.00 | $2.02B | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $203M | $788M | $836M | $503M | $10.27B | $343.34B |
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Nuclear Energy… (NNE) | 100 | 335.7 | +235.7% |
| Oklo Inc. (OKLO) | 100 | 603.2 | +503.2% |
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | 100 | 121.9 | +21.9% |
| BWX Technologies, I… (BWXT) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 157.6 | +57.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMSR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NNE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 383.2% 10Y total return vs JPM's 475.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.93, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 53.48x
OKLO doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
In this particular matchup, SMR is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
BWXT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
- 18.3% revenue growth vs OKLO's -125.2%
- +39.6% vs SMR's -74.9%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs SMR's -20.7%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs SMR's -38.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -314.7%
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- PEG 0.81 vs BWXT's 9.62
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 24.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.21
- Beta 0.94 vs IMSR's 4.60
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.3% revenue growth vs OKLO's -125.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 24.7x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.21 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SMR's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs IMSR's 4.60 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (4 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.6% vs SMR's -74.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs SMR's -38.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -314.7% |
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • NNE leads 1 • IMSR leads 0 • OKLO leads 0 • SMR leads 0 • BWXT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and OKLO operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMR's -20.7%. On growth, BWXT holds the edge at +26.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $0 | $19M | $3.4B | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | -$44M | -$172M | -$711M | $458M | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | -$31M | -$129M | -$386M | $345M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$242M | -$38M | -$943M | -$1.4B | $328M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +22.4% | +16.8% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | -38.1% | +11.0% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | -20.7% | +10.2% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | -74.5% | +9.7% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | -95.8% | +26.1% | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.3% | +68.4% | -167.6% | -145.5% | +20.7% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 71% valuation discount to BWXT's 54.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs BWXT's 12.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $625M | $1.0B | $10.6B | $1.4B | $17.8B | $348.2B | $892.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $530M | $842M | $9.8B | $589M | $19.3B | $383.5B | $1.49T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.38x | -23.66x | -84.36x | -4.91x | 54.02x | 26.62x | 15.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 41.26x | 24.75x | 14.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 12.59x | 2.38x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 44.59x | 25.89x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | 45.28x | 5.56x | 7.26x | 3.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 4.27x | 6.02x | 1.57x | 14.44x | 10.18x | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 60.17x | 65.76x | 8.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-49 for SMR. OKLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs SMR's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.4% | -7.6% | -8.6% | -48.9% | +27.9% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.0% | -7.5% | -8.3% | -38.1% | +8.6% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.8% | -2.6% | -24.7% | -3.1% | +10.1% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.7% | -35.8% | -15.7% | -87.8% | +10.8% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.00x | — | 1.63x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | -$200M | -$787M | -$836M | $1.5B | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $203M | $788M | $836M | $503M | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $3M | $1M | $0 | $2.0B | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.45x | — | — | — | 10.88x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NNE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NNE five years ago would be worth $48,324 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,332 for IMSR. Over the past 12 months, BWXT leads with a +39.6% total return vs SMR's -74.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNE at 69.1% vs IMSR's -30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | -9.2% | -21.9% | -34.7% | +6.9% | +18.6% | -0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.7% | -27.6% | -7.2% | -74.9% | +39.6% | +17.7% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +383.2% | +309.6% | +31.3% | +190.7% | +42.6% | +133.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +383.2% | +309.6% | +6.5% | +212.1% | +63.1% | +120.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +383.2% | +309.6% | +7.0% | +474.2% | +118.2% | +475.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.7% | +69.1% | +60.0% | +9.5% | +42.7% | +12.6% | +32.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMSR's 4.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs SMR's 18.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.60x | 3.93x | 3.95x | 4.06x | 1.88x | -0.20x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.16 | $60.87 | $193.84 | $57.42 | $241.82 | $84.04 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.33 | $18.95 | $44.88 | $8.85 | $133.84 | $65.35 | $266.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +41.2% | +31.3% | +18.5% | +80.2% | +96.3% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 44.2 | 42.9 | 41.1 | 46.2 | 60.8 | 65.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 2.6M | 13.4M | 32.3M | 915K | 12.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NNE as "Buy", OKLO as "Buy", SMR as "Buy", BWXT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.4% upside for NNE (target: $50) vs 6.4% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.52% vs BWXT's 0.52%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $50.00 | $91.50 | $16.17 | $225.00 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 13 | 16 | 16 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.5% | +2.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 10 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.01 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs SMR vs BWXT vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMSR or NNE or OKLO or SMR or BWXT or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or SMR or BWXT or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 9x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. at 54. 0x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 9. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or SMR or BWXT or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) delivered a total return of +383.
2%, compared to -66. 7% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +475. 6% versus IMSR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or SMR or BWXT or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Terrestrial Energy Inc. 's 4. 60β — meaning IMSR is approximately -2396% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oklo Inc. (OKLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or SMR or BWXT or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMR leads at 38. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or SMR or BWXT or KO or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -1130. 3% for NuScale Power Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -21. 9% for SMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMSR or NNE or OKLO or SMR or BWXT or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 9. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 41. 3x for BWX Technologies, Inc. — 26. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NNE: 99. 4% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or SMR or BWXT or KO or JPM?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), BWXT (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. IMSR, NNE, OKLO, SMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMSR or NNE or OKLO or SMR or BWXT or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +118. 2% 10Y return). Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a higher beta of 4. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +118. 2%, IMSR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMSR and NNE and OKLO and SMR and BWXT and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMSR (Energy) and NNE (Industrials) and OKLO (Utilities) and SMR (Utilities) and BWXT (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OKLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BWXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. BWXT, KO, JPM pay a dividend while IMSR, NNE, OKLO, SMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.