Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
IMSR logo
IMSR
SMR logo
SMR
OKLO logo
OKLO
NNE logo
NNE
BWXT logo
BWXT
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMSR vs SMR vs OKLO vs NNE vs BWXT vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMSR
Terrestrial Energy Inc.

Regulated Electric

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$625M
5Y Perf.-19.7%
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.43B
5Y Perf.+21.9%
OKLO
Oklo Inc.

Regulated Electric

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.57B
5Y Perf.+503.2%
NNE
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.04B
5Y Perf.+235.7%
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$17.77B
5Y Perf.+110.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$892.31B
5Y Perf.+57.6%

IMSR vs SMR vs OKLO vs NNE vs BWXT vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMSR logoIMSR
SMR logoSMR
OKLO logoOKLO
NNE logoNNE
BWXT logoBWXT
JPM logoJPM
IndustryRegulated ElectricRenewable UtilitiesRegulated ElectricIndustrial - MachineryAerospace & DefenseBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$625M$1.43B$10.57B$1.04B$17.77B$892.31B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$19M$0.00$0.00$3.38B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-46M$-386M$-129M$-31M$345M$57.05B
Gross Margin22.4%16.8%60.0%
Operating Margin-38.1%11.0%25.9%
Forward P/E41.3x14.3x
Total Debt$2M$0.00$1M$3M$2.02B$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$97M$836M$788M$203M$503M$343.34B

IMSR vs SMR vs OKLO vs NNE vs BWXT vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMSR
SMR
OKLO
NNE
BWXT
JPM
StockMay 24Jun 26Return
NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR)100121.9+21.9%
Oklo Inc. (OKLO)100603.2+503.2%
Nano Nuclear Energy… (NNE)100335.7+235.7%
BWX Technologies, I… (BWXT)100210.5+110.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100157.6+57.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMSR vs SMR vs OKLO vs NNE vs BWXT vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. BWX Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
IMSR
Terrestrial Energy Inc.
The Energy Pick

IMSR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: energy exposure
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
The Utilities Pick

SMR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: utilities exposure
OKLO
Oklo Inc.
The Utilities Pick

Among these 6 stocks, OKLO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: utilities exposure
NNE
Nano Nuclear Energy Inc
The Long-Run Compounder

NNE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 383.2% 10Y total return vs JPM's 475.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 3.93, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 53.48x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

BWXT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
  • 18.3% revenue growth vs OKLO's -125.2%
  • +39.6% vs SMR's -74.9%
  • 8.6% ROA vs SMR's -38.1%, ROIC 10.1% vs -314.7%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • PEG 0.81 vs BWXT's 9.62
  • Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
  • Lower P/E (14.3x vs 41.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 9.62
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBWXT logoBWXT18.3% revenue growth vs OKLO's -125.2%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.3x vs 41.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 9.62
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs SMR's -20.7%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs IMSR's 4.60
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BWXT's 0.5%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BWXT logoBWXT+39.6% vs SMR's -74.9%
Efficiency (ROA)BWXT logoBWXT8.6% ROA vs SMR's -38.1%, ROIC 10.1% vs -314.7%

IMSR vs SMR vs OKLO vs NNE vs BWXT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Nuclear Energy Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Nuclear Energy Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
IMSRTerrestrial Energy Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SMRNuScale Power Corporation
FY 2025
Other
100.0%$134,000
OKLOOklo Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NNENano Nuclear Energy Inc

Segment breakdown not available.

BWXTBWX Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Government Operations Segment
73.4%$2.4B
Commercial Operations Segment
26.6%$853M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

IMSR vs SMR vs OKLO vs NNE vs BWXT vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGOKLO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and NNE operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMR's -20.7%. On growth, BWXT holds the edge at +26.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…OKLO logoOKLOOklo Inc.NNE logoNNENano Nuclear Ener…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$19M$0$0$3.4B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$38M-$711M-$172M-$44M$458M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$46M-$386M-$129M-$31M$345M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$242M-$1.4B-$943M-$38M$328M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.4%+16.8%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-38.1%+11.0%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-20.7%+10.2%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-74.5%+9.7%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-95.8%+26.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.3%-145.5%-167.6%+68.4%+20.7%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.9x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 71% valuation discount to BWXT's 54.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs BWXT's 12.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…OKLO logoOKLOOklo Inc.NNE logoNNENano Nuclear Ener…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$625M$1.4B$10.6B$1.0B$17.8B$892.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$530M$589M$9.8B$842M$19.3B$1.49T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-19.38x-4.91x-84.36x-23.66x54.02x15.93x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.41.26x14.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate12.59x0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple44.59x18.32x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue45.28x5.56x3.19x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.83x1.57x6.02x4.27x14.44x2.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF60.17x8.85x
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BWXT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

BWXT delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-49 for SMR. OKLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMSR scores 5/9 vs SMR's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…OKLO logoOKLOOklo Inc.NNE logoNNENano Nuclear Ener…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.4%-48.9%-8.6%-7.6%+27.9%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.0%-38.1%-8.3%-7.5%+8.6%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-18.8%-3.1%-24.7%-2.6%+10.1%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-16.7%-87.8%-15.7%-35.8%+10.8%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9504455
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.00x0.01x1.63x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$95M-$836M-$787M-$200M$1.5B$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$97M$836M$788M$203M$503M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$0$1M$3M$2.0B$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.45x10.88x0.74x
BWXT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NNE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NNE five years ago would be worth $48,324 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,332 for IMSR. Over the past 12 months, BWXT leads with a +39.6% total return vs SMR's -74.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNE at 69.1% vs IMSR's -30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…OKLO logoOKLOOklo Inc.NNE logoNNENano Nuclear Ener…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.8%-34.7%-21.9%-9.2%+6.9%-0.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-66.7%-74.9%-7.2%-27.6%+39.6%+20.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+31.3%+309.6%+383.2%+190.7%+133.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+6.5%+309.6%+383.2%+212.1%+120.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+7.0%+309.6%+383.2%+474.2%+475.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.7%+9.5%+60.0%+69.1%+42.7%+32.7%
NNE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMSR's 4.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs SMR's 18.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…OKLO logoOKLOOklo Inc.NNE logoNNENano Nuclear Ener…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5004.60x4.06x3.95x3.93x1.88x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.16$57.42$193.84$60.87$241.82$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.33$8.85$44.88$18.95$133.84$266.85
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.8%+18.5%+31.3%+41.2%+80.2%+94.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.841.142.944.246.265.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.0M32.3M13.4M2.6M915K7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SMR as "Buy", OKLO as "Buy", NNE as "Buy", BWXT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.4% upside for NNE (target: $50) vs 6.4% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs BWXT's 0.52%.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…SMR logoSMRNuScale Power Cor…OKLO logoOKLOOklo Inc.NNE logoNNENano Nuclear Ener…BWXT logoBWXTBWX Technologies,…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$16.17$91.50$50.00$225.00$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts161331661
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.01$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.2%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BWXT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMSR vs SMR vs OKLO vs NNE vs BWXT vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMSR or SMR or OKLO or NNE or BWXT or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, BWX Technologies, Inc.

(BWXT) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMSR or SMR or OKLO or NNE or BWXT or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 9x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. at 54. 0x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 9. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMSR or SMR or OKLO or NNE or BWXT or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) delivered a total return of +383.

2%, compared to -66. 7% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +475. 6% versus IMSR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMSR or SMR or OKLO or NNE or BWXT or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Terrestrial Energy Inc. 's 4. 60β — meaning IMSR is approximately 387% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oklo Inc. (OKLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMSR or SMR or OKLO or NNE or BWXT or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BWX Technologies, Inc.

(BWXT) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BWX Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 16. 9% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMR leads at 38. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMSR or SMR or OKLO or NNE or BWXT or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -1130. 3% for NuScale Power Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -21. 9% for SMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IMSR or SMR or OKLO or NNE or BWXT or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 9. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 41. 3x for BWX Technologies, Inc. — 26. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NNE: 99. 4% to $50. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IMSR or SMR or OKLO or NNE or BWXT or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield), BWXT (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. IMSR, SMR, OKLO, NNE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IMSR or SMR or OKLO or NNE or BWXT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +475. 6% 10Y return). Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a higher beta of 4. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +475. 6%, IMSR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IMSR and SMR and OKLO and NNE and BWXT and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (IMSR (Energy) and SMR (Utilities) and OKLO (Utilities) and NNE (Industrials) and BWXT (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IMSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OKLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BWXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. BWXT, JPM pay a dividend while IMSR, SMR, OKLO, NNE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.