Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
KIDZ logo
KIDZ
PRDO logo
PRDO
LAUR logo
LAUR
LRN logo
LRN
COUR logo
COUR
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KIDZ vs PRDO vs LAUR vs LRN vs COUR vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KIDZ
Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-99.6%
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.14B
5Y Perf.+35.7%
LAUR
Laureate Education, Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.88B
5Y Perf.+70.2%
LRN
Stride, Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.12B
5Y Perf.-32.0%
COUR
Coursera, Inc.

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$896M
5Y Perf.-37.2%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$869.15B
5Y Perf.+27.2%

KIDZ vs PRDO vs LAUR vs LRN vs COUR vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KIDZ logoKIDZ
PRDO logoPRDO
LAUR logoLAUR
LRN logoLRN
COUR logoCOUR
JPM logoJPM
IndustryEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training ServicesEducation & Training ServicesBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$2M$2.14B$4.88B$4.12B$896M$869.15B
Revenue (TTM)$3M$855M$1.74B$2.54B$774M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-11M$170M$280M$308M$-64M$57.05B
Gross Margin57.8%71.1%26.9%38.3%54.8%60.0%
Operating Margin-136.5%24.3%24.0%15.8%-11.4%25.9%
Forward P/E11.7x16.0x13.7x12.8x14.0x
Total Debt$9M$105M$847M$550M$5M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$3M$132M$147M$782M$793M$343.34B

KIDZ vs PRDO vs LAUR vs LRN vs COUR vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KIDZ
PRDO
LAUR
LRN
COUR
JPM
StockApr 25Jun 26Return
Classover Holdings,… (KIDZ)1000.4-99.6%
Perdoceo Education … (PRDO)100135.7+35.7%
Laureate Education,… (LAUR)100170.2+70.2%
Stride, Inc. (LRN)10068.0-32.0%
Coursera, Inc. (COUR)10062.8-37.2%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100127.2+27.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KIDZ vs PRDO vs LAUR vs LRN vs COUR vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PRDO leads in 4 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. LAUR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇PRDO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
KIDZ
Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock
The Consumer Defensive Pick

KIDZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation
The Income Pick

PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 1.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 10.8%, current ratio 5.06x
  • Beta 0.31, yield 1.6%, current ratio 5.06x
  • 24.2% revenue growth vs KIDZ's -8.4%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LAUR
Laureate Education, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

LAUR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +55.8% vs KIDZ's -99.9%
Best for: momentum
LRN
Stride, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LRN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 7.1% 10Y total return vs PRDO's 499.0%
  • PEG 0.24 vs PRDO's 1.71
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
COUR
Coursera, Inc.
The Growth Play

COUR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth 39.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.

  • 20.4% margin vs KIDZ's -356.2%
  • 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: quality and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPRDO logoPRDO24.2% revenue growth vs KIDZ's -8.4%
ValuePRDO logoPRDOLower P/E (11.7x vs 14.0x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs KIDZ's -356.2%
Stability / SafetyPRDO logoPRDOBeta 0.31 vs KIDZ's 2.94, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (4 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)LAUR logoLAUR+55.8% vs KIDZ's -99.9%
Efficiency (ROA)PRDO logoPRDO13.2% ROA vs KIDZ's -60.2%, ROIC 15.3% vs -57.7%

KIDZ vs PRDO vs LAUR vs LRN vs COUR vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KIDZClassover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock
FY 2019
Advertising
84.8%$4M
Content
15.2%$688,465
PRDOPerdoceo Education Corporation
FY 2025
C T U
54.6%$462M
A I U S
26.8%$226M
University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, LLC
18.6%$158M
LAURLaureate Education, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Services
0.0%$225M
Sales Discounts, Waivers And Scholarships
0.0%$-569,457,000
LRNStride, Inc.
FY 2025
General Education
43.1%$1.4B
Career Learning
28.5%$957M
Middle - High School
26.1%$876M
Adult
2.4%$80M
COURCoursera, Inc.
FY 2025
Consumer Segment
66.3%$502M
Enterprise Segment
33.7%$255M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

KIDZ vs PRDO vs LAUR vs LRN vs COUR vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGCOUR

Who Leads Where

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories

LRN leads 1 • KIDZ leads 0 • PRDO leads 0 • LAUR leads 0 • COUR leads 0 • 3 tied

Explore the data ↓
COURCoursera, Inc.
0leads
LAURLaureate Education, I…
0leads
PRDOPerdoceo Education Co…
0leads
KIDZClassover Holdings, I…
0leads
LRNStride, Inc.
1leads
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
2leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 91325.5x KIDZ's $3M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZ's -3.6%. On growth, LAUR holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKIDZ logoKIDZClassover Holding…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…LRN logoLRNStride, Inc.COUR logoCOURCoursera, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3M$855M$1.7B$2.5B$774M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M$247M$535M$525M-$67M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$11M$170M$280M$308M-$64M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M$221M$264M$400M$84M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.8%+71.1%+26.9%+38.3%+54.8%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-136.5%+24.3%+24.0%+15.8%-11.4%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.6%+19.9%+16.1%+12.2%-8.2%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-136.0%+25.8%+15.2%+15.8%+10.8%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-36.4%+4.1%+15.4%+2.7%+9.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.4%+30.8%-15.4%-7.4%-140.0%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — KIDZ and LRN and COUR each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.1x trailing earnings, PRDO trades at a 22% valuation discount to LAUR's 18.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LRN offers better value at 0.28x vs PRDO's 2.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricKIDZ logoKIDZClassover Holding…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…LRN logoLRNStride, Inc.COUR logoCOURCoursera, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$2M$2.1B$4.9B$4.1B$896M$869.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9M$2.1B$5.6B$3.9B$108M$1.47T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.17x14.08x18.07x16.26x-17.06x15.52x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.67x16.03x13.73x12.82x13.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.06x0.28x1.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.88x10.29x8.19x18.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.56x2.53x2.87x1.71x1.18x3.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.31x2.32x4.27x3.17x1.36x2.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.86x18.53x11.05x8.36x8.62x
Evenly matched — KIDZ and LRN and COUR each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — LRN and COUR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

LAUR delivers a 25.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZ. COUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRDO scores 7/9 vs KIDZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKIDZ logoKIDZClassover Holding…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…LRN logoLRNStride, Inc.COUR logoCOURCoursera, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.8%+17.2%+25.4%+19.9%-10.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-60.2%+13.2%+12.9%+13.1%-6.4%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-57.7%+15.3%+20.3%+22.0%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-61.4%+17.5%+26.7%+19.6%-12.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9475765
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.50x0.11x0.71x0.37x0.01x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7M-$27M$701M-$233M-$788M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$132M$147M$782M$793M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$105M$847M$550M$5M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.43x35.92x34.91x36.09x0.74x
Evenly matched — LRN and COUR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LRN five years ago would be worth $32,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12 for KIDZ. Over the past 12 months, LAUR leads with a +55.8% total return vs KIDZ's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 41.6% vs KIDZ's -89.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKIDZ logoKIDZClassover Holding…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…LRN logoLRNStride, Inc.COUR logoCOURCoursera, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-97.4%+18.1%+2.6%+49.7%-25.3%-3.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.9%+7.5%+55.8%-31.5%-40.2%+18.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+183.8%+182.0%+132.7%-59.1%+131.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+182.2%+187.7%+224.2%-87.8%+102.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+499.0%+231.8%+708.1%-88.2%+433.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.3%+41.6%+41.3%+32.5%-25.8%+32.4%
LRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PRDO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PRDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZ's 2.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs KIDZ's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKIDZ logoKIDZClassover Holding…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…LRN logoLRNStride, Inc.COUR logoCOURCoursera, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.94x0.31x0.56x0.54x0.75x0.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2327.70$38.50$37.91$171.17$13.56$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.19$26.66$21.16$60.61$5.00$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.1%+88.5%+90.1%+56.5%+39.0%+92.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10024.852.057.566.648.059.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M544K1.2M654K5.8M7.1M
Evenly matched — PRDO and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PRDO as "Hold", LAUR as "Buy", LRN as "Hold", COUR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.3% upside for COUR (target: $8) vs 8.9% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.91% vs PRDO's 1.63%.

MetricKIDZ logoKIDZClassover Holding…PRDO logoPRDOPerdoceo Educatio…LAUR logoLAURLaureate Educatio…LRN logoLRNStride, Inc.COUR logoCOURCoursera, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$44.00$39.00$109.50$7.79$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts911171761
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+0.0%+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises030115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.56$0.00$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.7%+4.4%+0.5%0.0%+4.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). LRN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KIDZ vs PRDO vs LAUR vs LRN vs COUR vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KIDZ or PRDO or LAUR or LRN or COUR or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger pick with 24.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ). Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KIDZ or PRDO or LAUR or LRN or COUR or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the cheapest at 14.

1x versus Laureate Education, Inc. at 18. 1x. On forward P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stride, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 71x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZ or PRDO or LAUR or LRN or COUR or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Stride, Inc.

(LRN) delivered a total return of +224. 2%, compared to -99. 9% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRN returned +708. 1% versus KIDZ's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KIDZ or PRDO or LAUR or LRN or COUR or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

31β versus Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock's 2. 94β — meaning KIDZ is approximately 838% more volatile than PRDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coursera, Inc. (COUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KIDZ or PRDO or LAUR or LRN or COUR or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is pulling ahead at 24.

2% versus -8. 4% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coursera, Inc. grew EPS 39. 2% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, KIDZ leads at 21. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KIDZ or PRDO or LAUR or LRN or COUR or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -209. 3% for Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -106. 7% for KIDZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KIDZ or PRDO or LAUR or LRN or COUR or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Stride, Inc. (LRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 71x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Laureate Education, Inc. — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COUR: 47. 3% to $7. 79.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KIDZ or PRDO or LAUR or LRN or COUR or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield), PRDO (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. KIDZ, LAUR, LRN, COUR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KIDZ or PRDO or LAUR or LRN or COUR or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

31), 1. 6% yield, +499. 0% 10Y return). Classover Holdings, Inc. Class B Common Stock (KIDZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +499. 0%, KIDZ: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KIDZ and PRDO and LAUR and LRN and COUR and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (KIDZ (Consumer Defensive) and PRDO (Consumer Defensive) and LAUR (Consumer Defensive) and LRN (Consumer Defensive) and COUR (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KIDZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LAUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; COUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. PRDO, JPM pay a dividend while KIDZ, LAUR, LRN, COUR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.