Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
KIDZW vs GOTU vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
KIDZW vs GOTU vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $15K | $540M | $348.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $6.15B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-323M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 57.8% | 67.4% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -136.5% | -8.2% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.7x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $586M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $712M | $10.27B |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIDZ AI Inc. Warran… (KIDZW) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 85.1 | -14.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 130.0 | +30.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KIDZW vs GOTU vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KIDZW plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GOTU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.98
- Rev growth 35.0%, EPS growth 69.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 46.7%, current ratio 0.94x
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 118.2% 10Y total return vs GOTU's -85.8%
- 27.8% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.0% revenue growth vs KIDZW's -8.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs KIDZW's -356.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.98 vs KIDZW's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs KIDZW's -99.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs KIDZW's -60.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -57.7% |
KIDZW vs GOTU vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GOTU and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 16055.5x KIDZW's $3M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KIDZW's -3.6%. On growth, GOTU holds the edge at +21.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $6.1B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$327M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$323M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $247M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.8% | +67.4% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -136.5% | -8.2% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -5.3% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -136.0% | +4.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | +21.4% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | +36.1% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KIDZW and GOTU each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14,616 | $540M | $348.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $522M | $383.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -11.98x | 26.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 24.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 25.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 0.59x | 7.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 2.95x | 10.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.81x | 65.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KIDZW. GOTU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KIDZW's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs KIDZW's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.8% | -20.8% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | -5.8% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -57.7% | -33.8% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.4% | -22.2% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 0.47x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | -$127M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $712M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $586M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.06x | — | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,313 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for KIDZW. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.7% total return vs KIDZW's -99.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 12.6% vs KIDZW's -77.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.2% | -38.9% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.4% | -61.7% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -59.5% | +42.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -90.5% | +63.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -85.8% | +118.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -77.5% | -26.0% | +12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIDZW's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs KIDZW's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 0.98x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.00 | $4.12 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $1.40 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +36.2% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.2 | 35.5 | 60.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 390K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.3% upside for GOTU (target: $3) vs 6.5% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.94 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.4% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 2 categories are tied.
KIDZW vs GOTU vs KO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KIDZW or GOTU or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 35. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 4% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (24. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — KIDZW or GOTU or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +63.
1%, compared to -99. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +118. 2% versus KIDZW's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — KIDZW or GOTU or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI's 2. 66β — meaning KIDZW is approximately -1429% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — KIDZW or GOTU or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 35. 0% versus -8. 4% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gaotu Techedu Inc. grew EPS 69. 6% year-over-year, compared to -498. 7% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI. Over a 3-year CAGR, GOTU leads at 35. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — KIDZW or GOTU or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -209. 3% for KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -106. 7% for KIDZW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 67. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is KIDZW or GOTU or KO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOTU: 97.
3% to $2. 94.
07Which pays a better dividend — KIDZW or GOTU or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. KIDZW, GOTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is KIDZW or GOTU or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +118. 2% 10Y return). KIDZ AI Inc. Warrant 2025 - 04. 03. 30 on KIDZ AI (KIDZW) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +118. 2%, KIDZW: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between KIDZW and GOTU and KO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KIDZW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while KIDZW, GOTU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.