Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
LGCY vs WMT vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
LGCY vs WMT vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Discount Stores | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $139M | $964.49B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $78M | $725.30B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $23.06B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 46.7% | 25.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 4.2% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 41.7x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $67.09B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $10.73B | $10.27B |
LGCY vs WMT vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legacy Education In… (LGCY) | 100 | 239.3 | +139.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGCY vs WMT vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGCY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 39.5%, EPS growth 34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 43.1%, current ratio 2.69x
- 39.5% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 447.2% 10Y total return vs LGCY's 173.9%
- +28.6% vs KO's +17.2%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- PEG 2.26 vs WMT's 3.79
- Beta -0.20, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.46x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.5% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 41.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs WMT's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (43.1% vs 132.7%) | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.6% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs WMT's 8.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs 14.4% |
LGCY vs WMT vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LGCY vs WMT vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 9310.2x LGCY's $78M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.2%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $78M | $725.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $41.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $23.1B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $12.6B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.7% | +25.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +4.2% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +3.2% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +1.7% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.3% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +19.6% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
LGCY leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, LGCY trades at a 58% valuation discount to WMT's 44.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.43x vs WMT's 4.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $139M | $964.5B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $137M | $1.02T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.66x | 44.32x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.35x | 41.66x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.03x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.10x | 23.19x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.17x | 1.35x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.40x | 9.14x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.12x | 64.63x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LGCY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $19 for LGCY. LGCY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs LGCY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.8% | +22.7% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | +8.1% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.1% | +14.4% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.9% | +17.5% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.63x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $56.4B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $10.7B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $67.1B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 136.29x | 11.70x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGCY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGCY five years ago would be worth $27,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +28.6% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGCY at 39.9% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | +7.7% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.5% | +28.6% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +140.7% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +167.1% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +447.2% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.9% | +34.0% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LGCY's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs LGCY's 74.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | -0.00x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $135.16 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.94 | $93.43 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +89.5% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 45.9 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 18.3M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LGCY as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for LGCY (target: $15) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs WMT's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $139.44 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 66 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 52 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). LGCY leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
LGCY vs WMT vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGCY or WMT or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is the stronger pick with 39. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGCY or WMT or KO?
On trailing P/E, Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is the cheapest at 18. 7x versus Walmart Inc. at 44. 3x. On forward P/E, Legacy Education Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 26x versus Walmart Inc. 's 3. 79x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGCY or WMT or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) delivered a total return of +173. 9%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +447. 2% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGCY or WMT or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Legacy Education Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning LGCY is approximately -821% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGCY or WMT or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is pulling ahead at 39. 5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Legacy Education Inc. grew EPS 34. 1% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LGCY leads at 27. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGCY or WMT or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGCY or WMT or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 26x versus Walmart Inc. 's 3. 79x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 25. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LGCY: 31. 7% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGCY or WMT or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. LGCY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LGCY or WMT or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 00), 0. 8% yield, +447. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +447. 2%, LGCY: +173. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGCY and WMT and KO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGCY is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, KO pay a dividend while LGCY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.