Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
LGCY vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Food Distribution
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
LGCY vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Discount Stores | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Food Distribution | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $139M | $964.49B | $355.61B | $37.93B | $197.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $78M | $725.30B | $49.28B | $83.57B | $93.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $23.06B | $13.70B | $1.74B | $8.24B |
| Gross Margin | 46.7% | 25.0% | 61.7% | 18.5% | 54.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 4.2% | 29.3% | 3.6% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 41.7x | 25.3x | 17.3x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $67.09B | $45.49B | $14.49B | $49.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $10.73B | $10.27B | $1.07B | $9.16B |
LGCY vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legacy Education In… (LGCY) | 100 | 239.3 | +139.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 101.4 | +1.4% |
| PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | 100 | 84.8 | -15.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGCY vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGCY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 39.5%, EPS growth 34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 43.1%, current ratio 2.69x
- 39.5% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 16.7x)
WMT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 447.2% 10Y total return vs LGCY's 173.9%
- +28.6% vs SYY's +7.9%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1%
- 13.1% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 15.7%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 2.6%
- PEG 0.32 vs PEP's 5.11
- Beta 0.31, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.31 vs LGCY's 1.44
PEP is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.5% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs LGCY's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 54-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.6% vs SYY's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 15.7% |
LGCY vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LGCY vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LGCY leads in 3 of 6 categories
KO leads 2 • WMT leads 0 • SYY leads 0 • PEP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 9310.2x LGCY's $78M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYY's 2.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $78M | $725.3B | $49.3B | $83.6B | $93.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $41.4B | $15.5B | $4.0B | $14.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $23.1B | $13.7B | $1.7B | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $12.6B | $12.6B | $2.0B | $7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.7% | +25.0% | +61.7% | +18.5% | +54.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +4.2% | +29.3% | +3.6% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +3.2% | +27.8% | +2.1% | +8.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +1.7% | +25.5% | +2.4% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +7.3% | +12.1% | +4.7% | +5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +19.6% | +18.2% | -13.4% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LGCY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, LGCY trades at a 58% valuation discount to WMT's 44.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.39x vs PEP's 7.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $139M | $964.5B | $355.6B | $37.9B | $197.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $137M | $1.02T | $390.8B | $51.3B | $237.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.66x | 44.32x | 27.18x | 21.23x | 24.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.35x | 41.66x | 25.27x | 17.27x | 16.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.03x | 2.43x | 0.39x | 7.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.10x | 23.19x | 26.39x | 12.30x | 16.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.17x | 1.35x | 7.42x | 0.47x | 2.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.40x | 9.14x | 10.40x | 20.89x | 9.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.12x | 64.63x | 67.15x | 21.30x | 25.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LGCY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $19 for LGCY. LGCY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs PEP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.8% | +22.7% | +41.1% | +80.7% | +40.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | +8.1% | +13.1% | +6.4% | +7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.1% | +14.4% | +15.8% | +15.7% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.9% | +17.5% | +17.3% | +19.0% | +16.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.63x | 1.33x | 7.81x | 2.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $56.4B | $35.2B | $13.4B | $40.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $10.7B | $10.3B | $1.1B | $9.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $67.1B | $45.5B | $14.5B | $49.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 136.29x | 11.70x | 10.70x | 4.35x | 10.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LGCY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LGCY five years ago would be worth $27,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,238 for SYY. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +28.6% total return vs SYY's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LGCY at 39.9% vs PEP's -4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | +7.7% | +20.3% | +10.5% | +3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.5% | +28.6% | +17.2% | +7.9% | +13.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +140.7% | +47.0% | +18.1% | -11.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +167.1% | +65.6% | +12.4% | +14.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +447.2% | +121.1% | +100.0% | +82.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.9% | +34.0% | +13.7% | +5.7% | -4.1% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LGCY's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs LGCY's 74.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | -0.00x | -0.20x | 0.31x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $135.16 | $84.04 | $91.69 | $171.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.94 | $93.43 | $65.35 | $68.19 | $127.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +89.5% | +98.3% | +86.4% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 45.9 | 60.6 | 66.9 | 41.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 18.3M | 12.7M | 3.9M | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and PEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LGCY as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", SYY as "Buy", PEP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for LGCY (target: $15) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, PEP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.86% vs WMT's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $139.44 | $86.13 | $90.44 | $167.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 66 | 48 | 30 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +2.5% | +2.6% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 52 | 56 | 10 | 54 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $2.04 | $2.04 | $5.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +3.3% | +0.5% |
LGCY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
LGCY vs WMT vs KO vs SYY vs PEP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGCY or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is the stronger pick with 39. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGCY or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
On trailing P/E, Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is the cheapest at 18. 7x versus Walmart Inc. at 44. 3x. On forward P/E, Legacy Education Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 32x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGCY or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
Over the past 5 years, Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) delivered a total return of +173. 9%, compared to +12. 4% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +447. 2% versus PEP's +82. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGCY or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Legacy Education Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning LGCY is approximately -821% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGCY or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is pulling ahead at 39. 5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Legacy Education Inc. grew EPS 34. 1% year-over-year, compared to -13. 7% for PepsiCo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LGCY leads at 27. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGCY or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 2% for Sysco Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 3. 8% for SYY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGCY or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus PepsiCo, Inc. 's 5. 11x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 25. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LGCY: 31. 7% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGCY or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP?
In this comparison, PEP (3.
9% yield), SYY (2. 6% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. LGCY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LGCY or WMT or KO or SYY or PEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 00), 0. 8% yield, +447. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +447. 2%, LGCY: +173. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGCY and WMT and KO and SYY and PEP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGCY is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PEP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. WMT, KO, SYY, PEP pay a dividend while LGCY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.